- 4,579
- Houston, TX
- astrosdude91
Origins: Liverpool, England
Genre(s): Rock, Pop
Years Active: 1960-1970
Label(s): Parlophone, Capitol, Apple
I think if the poll options were less about personal taste and more objective, then I'd agree with you... there's simply no way The Beatles can ever be described accurately as anything other than 'Hall of Fame' material. That said, I know several people who don't like them, but would not argue against their HOF status.If anyone votes anything other than hall of fame then they are an idiot. 'Nuff said.
If anyone votes anything other than hall of fame then they are an idiot. 'Nuff said.
That said, I know several people who don't like them, but would not argue against their HOF status.
I think most people are forgetting how they voted in past polls. But pretty much every other poll outside of this people voted on musical taste, now it comes to The Beatles and now its not about music taste but what they did. I recognize what they did but to me they are still just a boy band, and I find them rather boring. I know many musicians that share the same sentiment the closest one being my dad. So I'm kind of actually shocked that there aren't a few more like me in this thread. I kind of doubt that The Beatles really "reshaped" music how everyone claimed they did... I will still let one of The Who, Led Zeppelin or Black Sabbath have the title that The Beatles so often get.
I feel that, since I don't like any of their music, that they are over rated.
I'm another one who doesn't find their music particularly enjoyable, but would agree that they're one of the most important bands of all time.
This.
This has been bugging me. What does it mean by someone quoting something, and saying "this"? Does it mean they agree with it?
This has been bugging me. What does it mean by someone quoting something, and saying "this"? Does it mean they agree with it?
grrlpurple
G8R_MaD3
ivoyared
N99GT
MatskiMonk
Prosthetic
Be carefull! Mods are on you now! At least 10 points infraction should be in order!