Possibly the most disturbing news story ever...

  • Thread starter Famine
  • 86 comments
  • 2,199 views
Status
Not open for further replies.
Famine
I mean, it's actually illegal to print a photograph of, or publish a video containing, a"stiffy", despite the fact that 49.8% of our population can look at one whenever they feel like it.

Not that I've got a hankering after seeing someone else's, but it's an example of just how stupid the BBFC and Obscene Publications Act can be.
It's not actually. I know of 3 films rated normal 18s by the BBFC, and all contain "stiffys" and more. :yuck:
 
I have a real problem with the line

when she gave him a cuddle and comforted him one thing led to another

It is understandable, to a degree, that the boy didn't know what he was doing after the panic attack but the mother would have been fully aware.

This is just sick.
 
Klostrophobic
Darin wins the post whore award.

McLaren has only been post whoring for a couple days. Darin has done it with four (Josh7058, Powerman, GranTurismo7058, and now Darin) different usernames since November of 2003.

No.. I've been on GTP since October 12th 2001.
 
Der Alta
No wonder he had a panic attack. If you rolled over and saw that, and then realized it was your mother, you'd do the same.

Gahhh... Time to go heave.

AO
:lol:

It reminds me of a certain Tom Lehrer song...

Oedipus Rex anyone?
 
cpl_richie
IIt is understandable, to a degree, that the boy didn't know what he was doing after the panic attack but the mother would have been fully aware.

He's 18 - legally a "man".

I'd have had a panic attack afterwards if I'd seen that lying next to me - relative or no.

911_Carrera - there's a slight chance that almost no-one will know who Tom Lehrer is. But after that post, the number will go up significantly.
 
daan
It's not actually. I know of 3 films rated normal 18s by the BBFC, and all contain "stiffys" and more. :yuck:

I'll bet you do;)
 
Indeed - but it has only been very recently.

Without wishing to get graphic (okay, I'm going to), we're not allowed to see "penetration" of any object into any orifice not normally exposed, or bodily fluids. Astonishingly, if urine appears on our screen (someone in the room is a good shot... Damn), it's blurred/pixellated out. Seriously
.
 
Famine
He's 18 - legally a "man".

I'd have had a panic attack afterwards if I'd seen that lying next to me - relative or no.

911_Carrera - there's a slight chance that almost no-one will know who Tom Lehrer is. But after that post, the number will go up significantly.
I live to spread the word.

Oh, and :lol: at daan. 👍
 
Nah, "she's" got a face that you'd never tire of hitting with a shovel
 
Actually Famine I'm sure I read somehwere a while ago that male erections and penetrive sex are now allowed in porn movies aslong as it is identified on the packaging.

There was actually a boy in Swansea (where I live) who raped his own mum. And he was only 16. I think.

I find this sick. But not as sick as case I (briefly) stated above.
 
ExigeExcel
Actually Famine I'm sure I read somehwere a while ago that male erections and penetrive sex are now allowed in porn movies aslong as it is identified on the packaging.

:eek:

random film website
Having said that, BAISE MOI is an enjoyable film. Perhaps too much is made of it's explicit sexual content. Sure, there are numerous scenes of graphic fellatio, penetration etc - and it's amazing to think the UK theatrical release only had 10 seconds cut by the BBFC, especially when the rape scene is so jarring even WITHOUT the close-up penetration scene (intact here). But overall this is a fast-paced flick with plenty of violence of the 'gun-crazy' variety, and a simple kinetic plot that should please most exploitation fans.
 
Ahhhhhhhhh thats nothing ! In our news a lady ( a former teacher ) just got out of jail after 7 years for having sex with a 12 year old fella. She had two babys of his , one while in prison ......now he wants the judge to take away the restraining order against her so they can get back together ( he's now 21 ) Ahhhhhhhh true love ...'aint it grand !
 
Terrible Tigers
Nice case of apathy you have there...


Ok, no one got killed...

The fact is, that this woman (actually I think of some other words for her, but I can't type them in here) abused her own son. In my book that constitutes RAPE (statutory). If the lad had been 17 she would be in jail right now and branded a child-molester and added to the registry of shame.

Incest is illegal... lock her up.

Thought -- Would you be saying the same thing if a Father had sex with his 18 year old daughter? Or would that bore you too?
If he was 17 it wouldv'e still been over the age of consent here, thats 16. Also she didn't molest him or abuse him, he consented to it. Yes incest is wrong, very wrong but thats not half as bad as 90% of the stuff that goes on out there. I only have to read the Metro to see some proper bad stuff likeabus driver strangeling a gir because she wouldn't sleep with him.
 
live4speed
If he was 17 it wouldv'e still been over the age of consent here, thats 16.
Yes yes silly me for typing in the wrong number :ouch:

live4speed
Also she didn't molest him or abuse him
As I have mentioned earlier... I never stated that she molested him, I said she abused him. Read my earlier post.
She abused him, she is his mother, it's unacceptable, period!

live4speed
he consented to it.
He's obviously not playing with a full deck of cards. I could not imagine ANY scenario where I would willingly consent to having sex with a parent.

live4speed
Yes incest is wrong, very wrong but thats not half as bad as 90% of the stuff that goes on out there. I only have to read the Metro to see some proper bad stuff likeabus driver strangeling a gir because she wouldn't sleep with him.
That's irrelevant, we all know that there is worse stuff going on out there, but we are discussing ONE thing here.

@ all

Here's some interesting information culled from avert.org :

1) So what does the age of consent mean?
The age of consent is the age when the law says you can agree to have sex. Before you reach this age, you can't legally have sex with anyone, however old they are. The law says that to be able to have sex, both partners must be over the age of consent.


2) What is the age of consent?
What the age of consent is depends on where you live - there are different age limits in different places, and in some places the age of consent is different for boys and for girls. To find out about the age of consent in your country or state, please see our age of concent chart.


3) What is 'statutory rape'?
If you are under the age of consent and you choose to have sex with someone who is over the age of consent, then they can be charged with the crime of 'statutory rape'. Some countries have different names for this crime, and some states in the US call it 'unlawful sexual penetration' or just 'rape'.


4) And what's sexual abuse?
This is when a person under the age of consent is pressured into any type of sexual contact that they do not agree to. If you know anyone who is being pressurised in this way, you should tell an adult what's going on. Telephone helplines in your country should be able to give you advice and information.


Ok. So all this deals with is people under the age of censent. My opinions stated in this thread I stand by, and I feel that the law [UK] MUST have provision for this supposed "consentual" sexual encounter.

My feelings are still "She Abused Her Son" (Abuse of position, abuse of trust and all that), going by the law she could not be prosecuted under "Sexual Abuse".

In my book she "Raped" her own son. He was under stress having had a panic attack, he obviously wasn't thinking straight, and he was taken advantage of. Whether they both "consented" is dubious and was probably concocted "after the fact" [IMHO].

Ok so now here's the big one which illiminates any doubt whatsoever about the law in the UK. This comes from
HERE and is a very long read, but briefly on page 81

5.1.3
Incest is recognised around the world as a crime. Sexual relations between close family members have long been taboo in most societies. However, incest was not a criminal offence in England and Wales until the Incest Act 1908, now incorporated in sections 10 and 11 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956. There is an additional offence of inciting a girl under the age of 16 to have incestuous intercourse (section 54(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977). The offence of incest prohibits vaginal sexual intercourse between a man and a woman he knows to be his granddaughter, daughter, sister (including half-sister) or mother. Consent is irrelevant. A woman over the age of sixteen may not permit a man she knows to be her grandfather, father, brother
(including half-brother) or son to have sexual intercourse with her by her consent.

So there you have it... they both broke the law, consent is completely irrelevant...

In that case I change my view...

LOCK THEM BOTH UP!

Case for the prosecution rests mi-lud!
 
If incest is illegal then how do you explain Red necks and clan members ?
 
THAT IS NOT A MILF!!!!!! WHAT WAS HE THINKING!!!!! :crazy: !!!:yuck: KINDA LIKE THE MOVIE "SPANKING THE MONKEY" Except that it was a movie and it was fake.......and the mom in that movie was pretty hott.....BUT STILL EEEEWW!!!!! NOT WITH YOUR OWN MOM!!! .... oh well......whatever floats your boat.
 
ledhed
If incest is illegal then how do you explain Red necks and clan members ?

I don't understand your cryptic question and I'm not sure it actually has any relevance to the subject matter being discussed. If you think it is on-topic please phrase the question so it can be understood.

Also, bear in mind we are talking about the UNITED KINGDOM :)
 
ledhed
If incest is illegal then how do you explain Red necks and clan members ?

It's only illegal in some places.

smlove2.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back