- 1,015
- Canada
- DismissiveClOCK
Google admits vacuming unsecured Wi-Fi data - Link to article
Well now. First that Google Buzz debacle, then numerous Facebook headlines (some as late as this past week - the results of a quick "privacy" search on tumblr reveals about half Facebook-related results), and now this.
All the while, lobbying groups are petitioning governments worldwide to monitor torrent traffic for copyright infringement - whose privacy is whose?
via Mercury NewsFor the past four years, Google has been reaching into unprotected Wi-Fi networks in homes and businesses in more than 30 countries and retaining data about people's online activities, a practice that the company said Friday was inadvertent and has been stopped.
Google said it had accumulated about 600 gigabytes of data — roughly equivalent to 300 million printed pages — transmitted over public Wi-Fi networks.
"The engineering team at Google works hard to earn your trust — and we are acutely aware that we failed badly here," Alan Eustace, Google's senior vice president for engineering and research, wrote in a posting to Google's office blog Friday afternoon.
Google said the data collection was the result of a piece of computer code written by a single engineer in an experimental Wi-Fi program in 2006 that was inadvertently used for the Street View program. The company collects data on Wi-Fi networks for the principal purpose of providing locational information to geographic services such as Google Maps.
Google said it would delete the data as quickly as possible, and promised to enlist an independent "third party" — perhaps a government agency or other independent group — to review the circumstances behind the breach. But the admission provoked concerns from some privacy advocates.
"Here they are just out and out snooping in neighborhoods and spying on people," said John Simpson of Consumer Watchdog, a frequent Google critic who questioned whether Google violated wiretapping laws.
"With a database of MAC addresses, you can tie communications back to a certain location and in the process make anonymity on the Web harder and harder to achieve," said Chris Hoofnagle, a privacy expert at the UC Berkeley law school.
Well now. First that Google Buzz debacle, then numerous Facebook headlines (some as late as this past week - the results of a quick "privacy" search on tumblr reveals about half Facebook-related results), and now this.
All the while, lobbying groups are petitioning governments worldwide to monitor torrent traffic for copyright infringement - whose privacy is whose?
Last edited: