Questionable modifications: pictures inside!

  • Thread starter -Fred-
  • 38,842 comments
  • 2,854,270 views
Ugly/Ricer Priuses
image.jpg

image.jpg
 
It's not even close to rice and after six months you still don't know how to use that term.
Okay, so the Mustang with the built engine is "riced" according to you, but the Civic that barely made it over a speed bump isn't? :rolleyes:

kfhZZ80.jpg


vBupB4k.png


56zv1z9.jpg


HijqOmu.jpg

^I may have cried a little when I saw that. :P

Vfl7wiV.jpg

^Thank God that tree was there, I might not have even seen the antenna.

AKgofcr.jpg


MjVJZlH.jpg


TQ4mw3F.jpg


TRamu8m.jpg
 
Considering the term ricer was used to make fun of tuners who tried to make their car look fast when it isn't; putting on big wings, ridiculous body kits, fart can exhaust, all to give it that look and feel of a "fast car", I would say no. Its just the stance scene, which in its own can be a derogatory term for some. The car is completely stock, other than the ride height and the rims.

That Mustang is well on its way to riceland, but atleast it has supporting mods. I would just call it extremely tacky.
 
Okay, so the Mustang with the built engine is "riced" according to you, but the Civic that barely made it over a speed bump isn't? :rolleyes:

kfhZZ80.jpg


vBupB4k.png


56zv1z9.jpg


HijqOmu.jpg

^I may have cried a little when I saw that. :P

Vfl7wiV.jpg

^Thank God that tree was there, I might not have even seen the antenna.

AKgofcr.jpg


MjVJZlH.jpg


TQ4mw3F.jpg


TRamu8m.jpg
So much ugliness in one post. Why would anyone to this to their cars?
 
I'd totally drive the Challenger Daytona Roadrunner Superbird if the side vent was removed and I could pick the wheels.
 

Latest Posts

Back