Questionable modifications: pictures inside!

  • Thread starter -Fred-
  • 38,887 comments
  • 2,907,445 views
Fairlady240zg
"DUUDE, I got this KILLER ka24de under the hood...add some more sticker and some NAAAAWZ and it will kill any lamborghini!"

It's a 180sx type X so it would have a blacktop SR20DET, but that doesn't change your point. :)

Fairlady240zg
This is an eclipse I saw the other day on club3g.org..uuuugh.

Now I would love to see a engine shot. :lol:
 
Fairlady240zg
Ok, no engine pictures that I can find.

Btw, Im serious about the 180sx..for educations sake.

I need to get up on my knowledge of the sx's.

Standard Type X's have 180sx printed all over the seats aswell as the cloth trim on the doors, They also have a different front bumper, wheels, rear wing and the main difference is the tail lights have circular lenses and a different garnish in between the lights (tinted dark in that red 180sx above). They also got bigger brakes from memory.

but these things can be fitted directly into regular 180sx's (except the tail lights require some work as they are not the same size). Most of the later type X's have airbags, thats part of the reason why I said,

"Oh and don't tell me they done that to a real Type X"

because copy's are becoming popular over here and I cant see many other details to confirm, so the orignal posted confirmed it.


Note front bumper and wing

180%20Type%20x.JPG


Note tail lights

2316469_2.jpg


I am aware that 180sx Type S look the same except have a SR20DE engine, so it could have even been that.
 
Fairlady240zg
This is an eclipse I saw the other day on club3g.org..uuuugh.

ba38491a.jpg


b541307c.jpg


a57df6f6.jpg


17126712.jpg


44672f69.jpg


213d56e6.jpg


5ae17449.jpg


e6fc4f57.jpg


6e8a13c3.jpg


If anybody actually knew what it takes to make something like that, you'd have a slightly different opinion.

The airbrushing is great, the interior too and the boot is very innovative. 👍
 
What are those headlights from? A Scion tC or a Beamer 645? If they are tC headlights than I question putting the headlights onto an unsporty car from an even more unsporty car.
 
GT Pro
If anybody actually knew what it takes to make something like that, you'd have a slightly different opinion.

I know what it takes, whats questionable to many people here is the direction the large effort, time and money went.

Come on, LCD screens on the front bumper, my opinion will never change on that.
 
VIPERGTSR01
I know what it takes, whats questionable to many people here is the direction the large effort, time and money went.

Come on, LCD screens on the front bumper, my opinion will never change on that.

I must admit, I didn't see the LCD screens there but atleast it sets itself apart from any other car out there.

When it comes down to it, countless show cars look questionable if you know the total amount of money and time that went into them. But that's what it's all about; experimenting and blowing large amounts of money that could end up anything in the long run. It's just what it turns out to be is what you start to look down upon. Ie. those LCD screens, unconventional yet the driver experimented with them on the front bumper.

Sure, to you and many it might not be pretty but I guess it was simply a misinterpretation and misjudgement that led to it.
To be honest, not all these cars are ugly, nor questionable , they're simply misjudged.
 
GT Pro

I must admit, I didn't see the LCD screens there but atleast it sets itself apart from any other car out there.

No it doesn't - it looks just like every other 'modded' show car - stuffed full of pointless tat. They all do exactly the same moddifications, only in different places.

GT Pro
When it comes down to it, countless show cars look questionable if you know the total amount of money and time that went into them. But that's what it's all about; experimenting and blowing large amounts of money that could end up anything in the long run. It's just what it turns out to be is what you start to look down upon. Ie. those LCD screens, unconventional yet the driver experimented with them on the front bumper.

That's where the 'questionable' part of the thread title comes from :rolleyes:

GT Pro
Sure, to you and many it might not be pretty but I guess it was simply a misinterpretation and misjudgement that led to it.
To be honest, not all these cars are ugly, nor questionable , they're simply misjudged.

That's why they end up in threads like this.
 
GT Pro

If anybody actually knew what it takes to make something like that, you'd have a slightly different opinion.

The airbrushing is great, the interior too and the boot is very innovative. 👍

True. It does take great effort and time to do up these extravagantly detailed vehicles. However, I do think there is a point at which it goes from 'customized' to 'obsessivized' (new-fangled english :D) and that's what I'd file that 2G Eclipse under. It's no longer a useable car, and I think that's when a modded car becomes questionable.

Speaking of which, here's one of my all-time favorite questionable mods:
blog12-18.jpg

Does he plan on 4-wheelin' this thing?
 
Holdenhsvgtsr

Oh dear god, we have loads in this area like that, you could bet big money on the fact that 2 of those exhaust tips are just shoved in to look "good"
You can clearly see that they are wonky at one side and im almost positive nothing is connected. :yuck:
 
ozyran
True. It does take great effort and time to do up these extravagantly detailed vehicles. However, I do think there is a point at which it goes from 'customized' to 'obsessivized' (new-fangled english :D) and that's what I'd file that 2G Eclipse under. It's no longer a useable car, and I think that's when a modded car becomes questionable.

A 'show' car is not actually modified to be street legal, that's why they call it 'show', not street.

Although that Eclipse is perhaps partly both.



ozyran
Speaking of exhaust, I was searching around at random and found...
mauspuff.jpg

...this!

Woohoo! I was waiting for someone to bring this up.

Yep, I saw these a few days ago in my monthly Auto Salon Magazine, and well... for the time being they are unfortuneatly here to stay.
What's worse is that they also have love hearts and other scary designs.

Prepare for many a controversy on these 'dishonourable modifications'
 
That's what happens when some idiot plays Underground 2 for too long. That beign said, I must say that the worst thing wrong with it is that the rear track wasn't fixed to go with the wide body kit. It also suffers from too many stickers, but that it a relatively easy fix.
 
GT Pro
A 'show' car is not actually modified to be street legal, that's why they call it 'show', not street.


But doesn't it defeat the purpose of having a CAR if you aren't able to drive it?
By all means, install all the audio-visual gear you can fit, paint it the most garish colour you can think of, but on the ugliest rims you can find. It is your car after all. Just don't expect everyone else to like it. "But I spent xxx dollars over xx years" does not justify a car percieved by others as questionable, or, in the case of most cars here, such as the eclipse, a load of pointless rubbish.

As a sort of experiment
21219996fullbs1.jpg

OR
integra1.jpg



Which has had more money spent on it? Which has more labour invested in it?
Which one would most people here rather own?
 
Well let's see... the top one's a '96 Spec JDM Type-R... but I don't like the looks of the C-West front on the Integra.

Still... easy. :P
 
Back