Questionable modifications: pictures inside!

  • Thread starter -Fred-
  • 38,888 comments
  • 2,933,981 views
10411976_10152488818576067_8161687458891774190_n.jpg

10334260_10152488818566067_1295706295557119442_n.jpg
The XF Wagon is a thing? AWESOME!
 
Just a small concern, but this Thunderbird to me looks higher off the ground than a normal one I see and I'm also not sure if the hood is necessary.
14342360799_8d1914dee8_b.jpg


EDIT: Nevermind, it's just a drag mod missing the engine. Not really questionable, sorry.
 
Last edited:
the T bird is indeed higher up than normal... and something about the position of the rear wheel almost looks like it may be a pro-street style tub job... in wich case the hood may have been functional, ride height would be up if the motor has been pulled...
 
the T bird is indeed higher up than normal... and something about the position of the rear wheel almost looks like it may be a pro-street style tub job... in wich case the hood may have been functional, ride height would be up if the motor has been pulled...

I was thinking the same thing the front seem that high due to a motor pull, but who knows exactly. Also I can't tell but it almost seems as if there is something under the body that is lifting it that isn't apart of the car like maybe some jack stands
 
hsv
"not for eco but for aesthetics rear fender skirts"

"Here is what they call an eco mod a wheel cover on a modern car
but there is part of me that thinks that although this has been done
for economy it would have been better if done firstly for aesthetics
then economy."


IMAG0194.jpg


What a lovely story.

WAT :lol:
 
Back