Questionable modifications: pictures inside!

  • Thread starter -Fred-
  • 38,888 comments
  • 2,933,807 views
10489718_583105268471398_836278098866049658_n.jpg
 
Apparently it was a joint effort between Lamborghini and Zagato. So I've heard anyways.
 
Zagato can be misunderstood. They have bad desings which actually look prtty good and awsome desings that look bad-ish. Most of their work looks amazing. And I agree, partially, that the Mustang is a bit odd.

But then I'm an european so my desing and mechanical taste are way different.

Example of a bad desing that looks good (You might disagree with me)
Alfa_Romeo_SZ.JPG


An example of a good desing gone wrong:
Zagato redesigned Shelby GT350 in 1965.

zagato2011mcdf.jpg
65598_466078083467187_1380305455_n.jpg
933930_466078110133851_2018398205_n.jpg
968896_466078070133855_101081640_n.jpg
shelby6s761rear.jpg
1966_ford_mustang_shelby%20350_gt_zagato_03.jpg
bb99c1f0994e3b68f1ad4561f533347d36f3dede.jpg
zagato14.jpg
1966_ford_mustang_shelby%20350_gt_zagato_02.jpg
 
i know what its trying to be...

Torino King Cobra prototype....(was designed to battle the aero of the superbirds but Nascar said No
blogger-image-259516225.jpg

but it missd
 
They still help a bit though.
An older picture I took from a car show I went to from back when I lived in Connecticut. Okay, if this is a real '93 Cobra, I can't comprehend why anyone would want to add extra badges to the back of one. Oh, if it is a clone though, still; if you're going to replicate a car, then do it RIGHT!
14359727960_6363cc1f83_b.jpg

BADGE overload. Such a shame on a awesome car.
 

Latest Posts

Back