- 3,023
- Peruibe, SP
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59fa5/59fa58b6fc994fe3650e297271494f433d675078" alt="12-Crazy-Cars-That-Actually-Exist.SR6_.jpg"
We've seen plenty of donk but this one is somewhat unique. Maybe not the biggest but this one has common sense.
You bet your ass I do!!@Slash Wish that Minivan was yours compared to the 🤬 one you have?![]()
Top gear US drove it in yesterday's episode.What that doesn't say is that 51 seconds after the video started the transmission exploded so hard that it went through the hood.
I seriously cannot even.![]()
We've seen plenty of donk but this one is somewhat unique. Maybe not the biggest but this one has common sense.
What's questionable?
What's questionable?
Don't expect Beef to understand any of them.I don't even think I'll bother with jokes anymore if the blatantly easy ones aren't landing.
![]()
We've seen plenty of donk but this one is somewhat unique. Maybe not the biggest but this one has common sense.
This is awesome.No, no, no, no, no! What the hell did I just look at?!
![]()
Nice try, but you can't impersonate a semi truck with an SUV!
Not... The worst. But not the best either.This was a '67 Mustang.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Quite questionable and well, there goes my taste down the hole. Wanna know why? Because I quite love this actually.This was a '67 Mustang.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Love everything about it except for the fog lights. They either need to be full size, or below the grill "Eleanor" style.This was a '67 Mustang.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The problem I see here is that it looks like they were trying to modernise the looks, which is a big no no for classics.This was a '67 Mustang.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
That is not a 67, everything from the doors up is from the 05. I'm thinking its just all molded together, unless he just swapped a whole roof line, which just seems ridiculous if he did haha.
Looking over it, I'm fairly certain its not a 67. Same doors, roofline, front and rear window, and mirrors as an 05.
I noticed the seats as well, but that is something that could have just been installed, so I checked everything else.Took another look and I think you are right. Roofline and door frame, plus the seats and dashboard appear to be '05-'09.
I suppose its a good thing its not a classic thenThe problem I see here is that it looks like they were trying to modernise the looks, which is a big no no for classics.