- 20,681
- TenEightyOne
- TenEightyOne
Ratko Mladic has been given a life sentence.
He was very rude and shouted at the judges, had to be removed from the court. Not the planet, but maybe that'll come.
Ratko Mladic has been given a life sentence.
...I'm surprised this guy was still not behind the bars, quite frankly.
Slobodan Praljak was in court today appealing his 20-year conviction in 2012 for crimes against humanity and crimes against Bosniaks. When the judge began announcing that the conviction stands, he drank a vial of poison.
He is still currently being treated. It is not known what the poison was or how he acquired it.
The IC for Yugoslavia's jurisdiction expires at the end of this year so they've got to be quick to process whomever they have left.
They're from the former Yugoslavia - and this one is a particularly easy name compared to the usual....A pretty dramatic way to go, then.
But one thing I've noticed only now - why on god's green earth all these guys come equipped with near-unpronounceable names?!
...A pretty dramatic way to go, then.
But one thing I've noticed only now - why on god's green earth all these guys come equipped with near-unpronounceable names?!
Melodramatic, even.
Another question, how long have the Serbs been there? Are they related to the Neolithic Vinca tribal culture?
Another question, how long have the Serbs been there? Are they related to the Neolithic Vinca tribal culture?
I'm more bothered, with this latest story, that the guy who drank the poison looks like Craig David from Bo Selecta, than the fact that he somehow managed to get poison into a courtroom in The Hague...
I wonder if the UN ministers might not be persuaded to leniency by a kilo of fine hashish and tickets to the Dutch GP at Zandvoort?The amount to be paid has not been announced.
I wonder if the UN ministers might not be persuaded to leniency by a kilo of fine hashish and tickets to the Dutch GP at Zandvoort?
There is one person in the world who can answer this question, and his name is Bill Clinton.I'm more interested to know what "fault" lies with the Dutch troops if they were overrun. What they ended up doing was wrong, sure, but was there no backup possible?
There is one person in the world who can answer this question, and his name is Bill Clinton.
There is no fault with the Dutch here. They were overun and surrendered. Anything that happens after that is on they who did the overunning.
Oh I'd agree, but I'm pretty sure a Judge with a gun pointed at his head and told what to do or else in a place where the rule of law is not honoured would teach that Judge that the law can be an ass in the real world rather in a courtroom where the rule of law is respected.I am pretty sure that the Nuremberg defense of "just following orders" when those orders are unlawful is even less valid for POWs, tho.
Oh I'd agree, but I'm pretty sure a Judge with a gun pointed at his head and told what to do or else in a place where the rule of law is not honoured would teach that Judge that the law can be an ass in the real world rather in a courtroom where the rule of law is respected.
they barely got proper support.
They didn't get any support at all. Nothing.
The UN said that just the presence of the bataljon was enough to deter the Serbs and it wasn't necessary for Dutchbat to carry heavy arms, so they didn't. Whoopsie.
When Dutchbat asked for support they were ignored 3-4 times until it was too late and the Serbs rolled in with their tanks.
UN and NATO are to blame. 100%.
Dutch soldiers request for air support was even rejected. What we have here is a receipe for disaster.
On that front, I do know that Dutch fighter bombers were initially used but they were withdrawn when the Serbs threatened to kill Dutch hostages if the aerial bombings continued.