Rate a Car (GT4.Revised!)

  • Thread starter Evolution.
  • 693 comments
  • 29,342 views
Honda S500 '67...

It is a classic and the S2000's great, great Grandad! Besides that it is light wieght and very agile. I wish GT4 would let you do custom motor swaps because a F20 (S2000 motor or Accord Euro-R) would be a Elise killer in that old car! :sly:

75/100 👍


Next Car: Nissan Skyline R32 GT-R V-spec II

(anyone besides Leonidae, because I already know how he'll score it! :lol: :cheers: )
 
5/100 for fiat 500R. I tuned it and still the same speed:grumpy:

Next car: Nissan R92CP race car 1992 i rate it at 98.999/100 because of wild speed and acceleration. The handling is agreeable:)
 
5/100 for fiat 500R. I tuned it and still the same speed:grumpy:

Try changing the gear ratios. Increasing power only increases acceleration.


Also, stop double-posting and try using the EDIT button, as daan has told you about five times now. I've merged your posts in this thread so you can see what an edited post looks like.

This is not a suggestion.
 
Try changing the gear ratios. Increasing power only increases acceleration.


Also, stop double-posting and try using the EDIT button, as daan has told you about five times now. I've merged your posts in this thread so you can see what an edited post looks like.

This is not a suggestion.

what is wrong with double posting:guilty: :indiff: :nervous: i dont know what is wrong with double posting
 
It takes up bandwith and is quite annoying, it's also easier to just edit your post. :)


.... Or Famine will destr... I mean ban you.

You also have to give a car to rate (and not rate your own), like this:

Ruf BTR
 
what is wrong with double posting:guilty: :indiff: :nervous: i dont know what is wrong with double posting

Given that you've been told to stop doing it by two moderators now, it should be readily apparent that, while YOU don't know what's wrong with it, it IS the wrong thing to do.

I am gratified to see that you are now using the Edit button to amend your posts. Please continue in this vein.
 
Well, since he is now banned, I will respond to RICHARDO's post.

RUF BTR: only driven it once, but it was pretty good. 80/100.

Next: Ford GT Concept '02
 
This one is pretty difficult to rate when I first got it I tuned it all the way I took it to the Twin Rout Motigi Road Course the 3.61 mile long one to test it out and it oversteered way to easy with a touch on the accelerater, but then I got used to the way it behaves and know I love to ????'s so anyway I'll give this Beautiful American Supercar with expert engineering that has a rare 100hp per liter ratio not seen in really any other American Sports Car in stock form a 95/100.👍

The 5 points off are because it still gets twitchy with me sometimes:ill:


Next car is the C5 Corvette Z06 nice one.
 
Fast, has decent brakes, has decent handling,... but man does it have some potential! (for an American car at least :lol: )

80/100 👍


Next Car: Amuse Carbon R
Most American cars do have potential, I don't see where you are getting at. Wasn't funny.

And I have never driven that brutal thing.
 
Didn't mean to offend anyone. :) It is just my opinion that American cars tend to use out of date components and designs for suspension (leaf springs, solid rear axles), engines (cam is still in the block, solve problems by adding more displacement), and they are too heavy (most of them). Granted these things still work and sometimes work good, but to me it seems low-tech and caveman like to use technology from the 1950's in newer cars. :grumpy:

I would prefer my cars to be lightweight, nimble, and to make the most of what they got and I am sorry to say that my own country's cars can't give me that. I mean how often do you see a stock American car with 100hp/per liter? 💡

It is just a preference that I have and i was just making a joke. :) Please don't take it personally. :guilty:
 
It's ok, it's not like there isn't some truth to it. :) But I still like my country's autos just as much as other cars from wherever.

Next car: Alpine A310

have fun...
 
Alpine is a good car when the tuning has been done right. classy 70's design and pretty quick when you know how to drive it. exceeds RUF's in handling. 80/100

Next car:Alfa Romeo Giulia Sprint Speciale.
 
Hmm the Alfa Romeo Guila Sprint special I like it alot a good ole classic it is not the best one but still good I like its looks a little as well.

I'll give it a 65/100 it is kinda low because the lack of power that is all.

Now for the 1964 Pontiac Tempest LeMans GTO awesome car faster than my Chevelle SS454:sly:
 
Can become a beast fully-tuned. But stock, just like the real car, is crap for anything that involves the steering wheel. (Seriously, a real 64' GTO dosen't like to turn that much.)

70/100

Buick GNX
 
Buick GNX...I give it 65/100 because it was a handful when I drove it one time. I'm sure the rating will improve with some work with suspension, though.

Next car: BMW 120d
 
I don't like this BMW. It's a diesel and its very slow. I wonder if it is the only diesel car in this game? 15 points...

next car: LANCIA DELTA S4 Rallye Car
 
80/100

May kill your ass in the corners, it's alot of fun trying to handle it 👍


Next: Toyota MRS/MR2 V-Edition (Toyota MR Spyder)
 
85/100

Great looks, handles like awesome and the Autobacs MR-s is sweet to drive.

Next car: Toyota Supra SZ-R
 
85/100Next car: Toyota Supra SZ-R...

Naturally Aspirated Supra! Not fun, to heavy, to slow :grumpy: ........ although tuned well it is able to take out the best of factory performers! :)

65/80 (only cause it has some potential)


Next Car: Trial Celica :)
 
Back