And Trackdays.I would agree if we were talking about a single car (unless it was a premium RUF). While unless you are big fan of the brand or just really enjoy driving that particular model, but I would argue a track offers a lot more longevity and playability.
👍 This is truly great news. 👍 I don't usually hop on these hype trains, but in this case it looks as if its relatively safe to do so. 
Track looks great and can't wait to drive it. It reminds me a lot of Spa in a few ways, which in my opinion, is a good thing. 👍 So yea, finally something for me to get exited about. 
Better than that damn car, uh?
The problem that I, and certainly others in here have, is that i've never actually seen a post of yours that has complemented GT6. Every post i've seen is just negative, and it just gets relentlessly tiring seeing negative arguments that almost seem forced.
I would agree if we were talking about a single car (unless it was a premium RUF
You can see it's GT graphics because of the distinctly average texture work, as usual. I really hope they make great strides in that area on PS4 and don't throw all the details into the cars again.
I mean you'd never mistake this for real life:
I'm pretty sure the problem is the trees, which will either head the toward the direction you're facing (Like in Ascari... creepy), or just look like cartboard cutouts.As far as I can tell PD use very high resolution Satellite Images to get the textures around the track making them 100% accurate in style and colour at the time of the picture was taken. It allows for the differing colours on the ground you don't see in other games making GT's renditions more accurate. Just look at Willow Springs and Silverstone for example. They look loads better because of the Satellite Image. They only use proper texture-work close to the track itself. I imagine doing this makes them closer to the real things and keeps the file size down as to make it work on the PS3.
In my opinion. One massive Satellite Image looks better than one or 2 grass textures because of the accuracy it creates even if it's slightly lower resolution on the boundaries. Besides, you won't see these lower resolution textures when you're actually driving around the track, which if I'm not mistaken, is what is intended to be done with the tracks.
In my opinion. One massive Satellite Image looks better than one or 2 grass textures because of the accuracy it creates even if it's slightly lower resolution on the boundaries. Besides, you won't see these lower resolution textures when you're actually driving around the track, which if I'm not mistaken, is what is intended to be done with the tracks.
.
