- 1,934
- Nazareth/Israel
- GTClub_Wajdi
So basically they will be trying to save rFactor 2's core?
Interesting to see what they'll be able to do with it, hopefully they'll do what ISI has failed to do so misserably!
So basically they will be trying to save rFactor 2's core?
Interesting to see what they'll be able to do with it, hopefully they'll do what ISI has failed to do so misserably!
So basically they will be trying to save rFactor 2's core?
Interesting to see what they'll be able to do with it, hopefully they'll do what ISI has failed to do so misserably!
Agreed, but what does that have to do with anything?SMS team that has 100 times the resources of ISI team developed Cars in 4 years and it comes out with a awful sim/Shift 3 arcade game with an awful physics and FFB and Horrible Horrible AI.
.
״ISI has failed to do so misserably!״Agreed, but what does that have to do with anything?
I know this is your game of choice, but even you got to admit the game is lacking in a lot of areas. Its got some great features, but the package as a whole isn't very good.״ISI has failed to do so misserably!״
I am a bit disappointed at some of the feedback in this thread, it certainly has not been constructive. Never forget, if other "games" have brought more realism it has been because ISI and rFactor have pushed the envelope in the past, and are doing so again.
Enduracers chose rF2 for a reason, more quality modders will come, in due time. Cheers.
That certainly wasn't my intention and without this thread I probably would never get any new info on rfactor 2. Its just that this is one of the games that help me make my decision to switch to PC. I guess its my fault for not trying it first instead of going off others opinions. This is the only sim I regret purchasing, I guess I just expected more to come of the game and for me it just hasn't come. I didn't think graphics was important to me, as I think Iracing looks fine, but this game for some reason looks very bad to me, like on par with GT Legends. Not very good for a modern sim.The issue here is one of perspective and expectations. At the end of the day I started this thread at a site that caters to Gran Turismo and console players. Nothing wrong with that. It remains a fact the site has seen it fit not to have a forum section dedicated to rFactor 1 & 2. This says it all.
A gaming community is not the same as a SIM racing community, all the complaints here, based on expectations, reflect that. Again, nothing wrong with having an opinion and being disappointment with rF2's progress. However, ISI is focused on a different product and audience. Case and point Race Department, who's audience rFactor 2 seems to be meeting and exceeding expectations (see comments).
Frankly I'd like to know from you guys if I should let this thread die. Not that I think I make a significant contribution to it, I just wonder if it is worth keeping it going if there is little to no interest.
I love this site and like the members here, so no recriminations intended. Cheers!
Hi
Nordschleife Vs McLaren F1 MP4/6 - rFactor 2 #3
Hi
Nordschleife Vs McLaren F1 MP4/6 - rFactor 2 #3
There is no offline "game" available. Why else would you buy rFactor2 if not for online aspect?I'm not sure about buying the lifetime subscription... Is the multiplayer worth it?
Because some people just like to race AI.There is no offline "game" available. Why else would you buy rFactor2 if not for online aspect?
Oh, yeah I guess. It seems that the content is so limited compared to other games though.Because some people just like to race AI.
That's why we have mods. I think rF1 had even less base content. All it had were a few upgradeable street cars and fake NASCAR, Formula Ford, GP2 & F1 along with around 20 tracksOh, yeah I guess. It seems that the content is so limited compared to other games though.
The base content isn't that limited. It's quite diverse. But it'd be dumb to buy an rFactor game and not install mods.Oh, yeah I guess. It seems that the content is so limited compared to other games though.