- 11,660
- GTP_Orido
Thank you, will watch and download the video
Just finished testing this one to put in the emulator. Since what I'm looking for is the balance between front and rear springs, this is definitely a good one:tup:. I first took it for a spin on Brands Hatch Indy as per spec sheet, no drivers aid what so ever and the feel was good, but I did have a problem with abs0
and BB 7/10, the wheels would lock up
, I have a little trouble easing the brakes in with a PS3 controller. I then tried it in National A 500PP Clubman, Matterhorn Roten-Boden, upgraded the tires to SS, the car handles beautiful even in the curves going down, only problem was the brakes. Redid the race with abs0 BB 3/5, this was much better for me, no wheels locked up, drove easily to victory (both times) with a 169PP under the limit. Real nice balance Ridox2JZGTE.
The listed brake balance are merely suggestions, I never consider brake balance as a part of the tune as it's very specific to each driver
Lowering to less than 5 usually gives nice balance between easy to lock up and good braking power with no ABS 169PP under is a very good achievement, congrats 👍
The car used is Mitsubishi Lancer Evo X CZ4A with a generous helping of HP increase. The specs of the real car :
) Advan Neova AD07 vs AD08 Time Attack. This replica is based on the very same car that broke the street car/tire lap record at Tsukuba ( under 1 minute ). Driven by the drift master / HKS Test Driver Nobuteru Taniguchi, the HKS CZ200S posted 59.495 time on lap 8. A testament of the excellent performance, consistency and durability of the tire. The tire used was Advan Neova AD08 ( there's a possibility the tire uses early phase "R" Orange Oil Compound which later become AD08R ) The equivalent is slightly below SM tire in GT6, as the SH tire severely lacks in straight line grip, but SM has a bit too high lateral grip, so I have to make do with SM tire and it works great.
, so I have to use slightly lower rate at 9.77 kg/mm. I have tuned the damper and ARB to help the car easier to rotate. With the visual ride height and test car ride height being front lower, the understeer effect needs to be reduced/controlled. I have provided a variety of ride height and alignment to choose from. The recommended setup is 12/9.77 + Visual Ride Height ( 70/80 ) and HTF Test Car Alignment, this is the setup that I used for the GT6 vs Real Life video 
![IMG_0083[1].jpg](https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/data/attachments/237/237069-99952cc6819c534f4c29fe4c4929c86c.jpg "IMG_0083[1].jpg")
Kart", it really hugs the road, I had to double check 
to make sure I had installed CM tires and not SS. Thanks for the great ride my friend. On the negative side 👎, I always have trouble finding the car I want in your directory, I tend to look for the manufacture and than the model, so I have to scroll through almost all of them to find what I want (yeah I'm sometimes a little 
impatient), I realize that putting the IRL tuners name is important but it is a little difficult that way. If the worst that I can say is that you make great tunes but your directory needs a little cleaning, I'll be able to live with that 
. Not as easy as the Accord I just tried, but more gratifying as a pilots point of view 👍. Tried it at Mount Panorama (free run) and Int.B Tour of America - Willow Springs - and - Laguna Seca. Much more sensitive to the drivers input, it took me 2 laps on each track to find a good braking point, at first I didn't like it much but the more I was able to control it the more I liked it. I like the handling and the out of curve response, one thing I had trouble with was, I was getting the rear inside tire turn to red while braking on downhills, and I wasn't applying full braking power, this happened at Panorama and Laguna Seca, apart from that it was like candy.
and 
