- 16,555
- Melbourne
- ScottPuss20
- CheetahsMeow
Oh definitely not
I remember reading about the Nomad Diablo in the Japanese GT3 years ago. The Licence for the car was obtained through the team and had nothing to do with JGTC or Lamborghini. It's quite possible that many of the racing cars have been obtained in a similar way.
True, a one-on-one race against Senna in cars with alternate liveries and a somehow-super AI driver could have been fun.
With the Lotus do the hands look like they clip into the wheel to anyone else, especially when in the airbox view or whatever it would be classed as? Also for some reason the readout screen stops working in that view over cockpit, even though it's still visible.
(disclaimer: This is an obversation, not a complaint. It doesn't really matter)
Keep in mind that not having a licence to a series doesn't necessarily mean that the cars are off limits, depending on how strict the legislating body is with the manufacturers. There have been rally cars in the series since GT2 (GT1?), but PD didn't actually bother to get the WRC licence until GT5. They just modeled the cars exactly anyway, and merely called them "Rally Cars" rather than their actual competition names.Ok, thank you for sorting this out for me.
Do you know what license they have?
NASCAR?
Japanese Touring Car Championship?
Le Mans?
American Le Mans?
FIA GT Championship?
Formula 3000?
French Supertouring Championship?
FIA WRC?
German Touring Car Championship?
Swedish Touring Car Championship?
And many more.
But one thing is for sure, they have license to have japanese cars in Gran Turismo (especially Nissan)
Those backroom style dealings is why the Diablo was very publicly dropped from the game when it left Japan.I remember reading about the Nomad Diablo in the Japanese GT3 years ago. The Licence for the car was obtained through the team and had nothing to do with JGTC or Lamborghini. It's quite possible that many of the racing cars have been obtained in a similar way.
A race between twenty identical cars, despite my knowing that only a handful of chassis were ever built, just doesn't appeal to me.
It looks fun, but it looks like an online race, not a race for a Senna tribute event that takes itself pretty seriously.
It may well do but I spend too much time trying to keep the thing in a straight line to check.
Yup, but this is just to show an example. I agree that for tribute purposes the time trials against Senna's pole's were the best and most respectable option.A race between twenty identical cars, despite my knowing that only a handful of chassis were ever built, just doesn't appeal to me.
It looks fun, but it looks like an online race, not a race for a Senna tribute event that takes itself pretty seriously.
Keep in mind that not having a licence to a series doesn't necessarily mean that the cars are off limits, depending on how strict the legislating body is with the manufacturers. There have been rally cars in the series since GT2 (GT1?), but PD didn't actually bother to get the WRC licence until GT5. They just modeled the cars exactly anyway, and merely called them "Rally Cars" rather than their actual competition names.
And the overwhelming majority of the RM cars in GT2 were somewhat contemporary (when the game first came out) race cars with a decal or two changed/removed.
IngRobNy said
Yes, i can find at least one car in Gran Turismo 1 called rally, Subaru Impreza Rally Edition
Link: https://www.gtplanet.net/library/gran-turismo-1/ (of course )
V6 turbo+ v6 turbo sound= accurateHow can the RB sounds be accurate? How can the F3 & 97T be based on RB sounds? The RB cars don't exist other than in this game!
They would have used the F3 & 97T sounds as a base and modified them for the RB cars.
the Lotus has LOWER pitch.
I don't see PD updating a track. I mean, have they ever done that before??
Touché.No, but they've never released one half done like this before either to my knowledge.
No, but they've never released one half done like this before either to my knowledge.
Touché.
What is missing from these tracks? Are some corners themselves inaccurate? Buildings? What else?
75% of the people who will actually participate have already participated I think, and as fewer people take part in the event, remodeling the track becomes less and less of an economical use of their time. I can see them updating it for GT7, but I don't think they'll consider it pressing enough for them to address it in an online update.
I would like them to update the tracks, it's just they've never done it before....The tracks themselves, as in everything between the white lines, is accurate or accurate enough. Everything beyond that, including some run off areas, are wrong. The buildings/billboards/etc have not been changed at all.
True, I guess it just depends on the schedule for the track artists. Who knows, maybe they only had enough time to do the course now and they have a few week planned in the future to do the rest. We'll have to wait and see. It just seems odd, as someone pointed out, for a supposed perfectionist like Kaz to allow these mixed courses in. No matter what we the player thinks to him that must not meet his standard.
The cell phone tower at Curva Grande did kinda make me LOL when I first saw it at 80's Monza, to be honest.Touché.
What is missing from these tracks? Are some corners themselves inaccurate? Buildings? What else?
I would like them to update the tracks, it's just they've never done it before....
Then again, thus are already breaking new ground with the fantastic new sound samples, producing the best v6 f1 sound I have heard in a game. Fingers crossed...
The scenery doesn't bother me. As long as the new cars are quality (and I feel they are, once setup)...I expect a few things not to be perfect. Like scenery. That is the last thing I care about. The track surface and cars are good.
I haven't seen a single person bitch about the accuracy of scenery on modern tracks. Food form thought.
Doesn't sound lower than the X2011 to me.FTFY