Sony Reveals New PlayStation 5: Slimmer, Smaller, and With More Storage
- Thread starter Famine
- 98 comments
- 11,748 views
- 1,713
- Sydney
- snakebacon97
The difference between a PS5 and a PS5Pro would be insignificant on anything but a 4K 120Hz OLED. The focus would be pushing full 4K RT games from 30 to 60+, 1440p VRR games closer to 120Hz, and locked 120Hz games to higher resolutions.
From experience, I can say that while 40fps is better than 30, Rift Apart and Spider-Man are so much better in Performance RT at 80-100fps with hardly any image quality difference (at least on a 42" from 1.7m away) that you'll never want to go back to Quality mode.
Chikane_GTR
Premium
- 8,146
- Heaven
More pictures from reddit of the size difference.
Last edited:
- 171
- Brazil
The insistence on this white color and router design..., Sony really lacked creativity in making a simpler, minimalist and cheaper design to produce, it really isn't possible to understand some business decisions..
- 824
- United States
Perhaps they weren’t interested in a simple, minimalist design? Not that simple or minimalist designs really require much creativity to begin with. Perhaps what they wanted was something they considered a work of art, or maybe unique?
But you are correct, it really isn’t possible to understand business decisions you have absolutely no involvement in.
The cost of producing these consoles comes overwhelmingly from the internal components, so the external design can really be whatever because thermoforming and even injection molding plastics (I’d assume the plates and most other plastic bits of the console are thermoformed) cost differences would be negligible between this design and say a plastic covered simple box design. The real savings would have to come from the electrical components or even possibly (maybe) packaging, but not really sure how much they could really save there aside from just shipping in a stock plain brown box with no physical manuals/instructions included?
- 1,325
- England
- Doomotron
I have to thank Sony for this announcement as it finally pushed me to buy a PS5 three years after I first planned to get one... Just it's the original model they pushed me to get, not the new one.
I hate the new design for the disc drive. The disc drive on the original model was already a bit weird but at this point it would be less ugly if they gave you an external USB drive like those horrible cheap ones Asus makes but sells for £40 more than they're actually worth. Plus, there is no way I'm going to pay a higher price for the console and then pay extra just to have it stood vertically. More than £500 for the same console that was £400 just a few weeks ago is an utter joke.
So I've bought the original model with a disc drive, a special offer on Amazon I didn't even know existed, £410 for the console and FC24 (another game to add to the 'never going to play' list), and before they go out of stock I am going to get Cosmic or Volcano Red faceplates and a second controller in one of those two colours. Then again, I'm not sure why I'm bothering since I only play three games on my PS4 and can barely put up with Sony's anti-consumer crap that makes them compete with P&O, Activision, Bungie and Irish Ferries for my most disliked company. Truly one of the poopyhead companies of all time.
I hate the new design for the disc drive. The disc drive on the original model was already a bit weird but at this point it would be less ugly if they gave you an external USB drive like those horrible cheap ones Asus makes but sells for £40 more than they're actually worth. Plus, there is no way I'm going to pay a higher price for the console and then pay extra just to have it stood vertically. More than £500 for the same console that was £400 just a few weeks ago is an utter joke.
So I've bought the original model with a disc drive, a special offer on Amazon I didn't even know existed, £410 for the console and FC24 (another game to add to the 'never going to play' list), and before they go out of stock I am going to get Cosmic or Volcano Red faceplates and a second controller in one of those two colours. Then again, I'm not sure why I'm bothering since I only play three games on my PS4 and can barely put up with Sony's anti-consumer crap that makes them compete with P&O, Activision, Bungie and Irish Ferries for my most disliked company. Truly one of the poopyhead companies of all time.
- 2,356
- UK
- TPC_Watto
You realise it's a subjective opinion as to whether or not it looks aesthetically pleasing? Do you think Sony's business decisions held back sales?
Like the design or not, Sony have barely caught production up to demand.
- 1,792
- Nurburgring, Germany
It looks like the cheaper TEMU version that only houses 16bit Linux games. Hope it runs decent under heavy load.
Happy to keep my original fatboy till the plates fall off, but for new adopters it might be worth the price, but not at this subtle sony cost difference.
Last edited:
- 570
- Barcelona
- Metentso
I think they tried to make it appear the least bulky that was possible with those white flaps getting narrower in the middle. Probably it helped with sales.
INEEDNAWZZZ
Premium
- 1,832
- Lincoln
- EGGSBAWCKS
- DigitalLuke64DD
Pricing aside, this thing looks awful. The original PS5 looked jarring but it was at least an actual coherent design. With all the panel gaps and everything here, it just ends up looking like one of those cheap plastic console covers that they used to offer for the 360 back in the day.
- 40,812
In the long term absolutely. Not just through making their console look like varieties of Seto Kaiba outfits and claiming it's some marvelous aesthetic that "only" requires massive external size to keep it from cooking itself; but also through the various other Arrogant Sony things they've been doing since the start of this console generation. Many minor cuts still cause you to bleed.
But it's easy to pose a hypothetical that is impossible to disprove, since:
That was always going to be the case regardless. They went into this console generation with more momentum and market control than they had in 2006, and even the PS3 sold reasonably well considering it was a waste of dump that was by far the poorer choice to purchase for the first 3 years of its life.
Last edited:
- 912
- United States
That new one should fit nicely in between my Jaguar and my Nintendo 64. I think the curves actually match but I might have to flip the '64 over.
- 4,612
- SoCal
- GTP_MooCow
GOOD:
Honestly GT7 works perfectly fine on PS4 Pro.
For those who cannot make the financial jump to PS5 yet, don't feel bad, you really are not missing much.
You are still able to enjoy the race and the game.
BETTER:
For those lucky with a great TV and who are able to easily purchase the PS5 too (or PS5 pro if there is ever such a thing), do it, the graphics upgrade is so good on the eyes, it is worth it. Eye candy for sure. There is really no better 2D experience. It is just a visual pleasure but serves no purpose in making you a better or faster player.
BEST:
At this point, for me, the real reason one would upgrade to the PS5 is for the PSVR2 experience with GT7.
GT7 was truly designed to be experienced on VR from the start. There is no doubt about it.
The best GT7 experience is on PSVR2, the graphics doesn't match 4K, but it is perfectly fine once you have the headset on, you are fully immersed and I am very accepting of the graphics tradeoff.
NOTE: YOU NEED THE SEAT, WHEEL, PEDAL, SHIFTER AND COCKPIT SET UP: this would require at least a budget of at least $2500 to $3000 minimum to properly enjoy it.
(I have never tried playing GT7 in VR with a controller, i don't know how that would feel, but I think it is just wrong, so I dont even want to try)
Three different ways to enjoy GT7, all perfectly fine, and you should not feel bad until you are able to comfortably upgrade.
Last edited:
Tired Tyres
Premium
- 12,562
- West Yorkshire
- Tired_Tyres
- Tired Tyres
There's no reason for a pro. I don't think they'll be one.
- 1,731
- United Kingdom
I wouldn't be so sure , especially after "Slim" came out being true
also if you are fine with regular PS5 , you don't need to buy a Pro
Last edited:
Tired Tyres
Premium
- 12,562
- West Yorkshire
- Tired_Tyres
- Tired Tyres
The only reason there was a pro PS 4 was because Sony knew Microsoft where working on a new machine. It was a response to that and nothing else. Sony has won the console race again. Why would they split their userbase now?
- 167
- United States
To be aligned with PC price to power. Also that’s not true that they did it because of MS. They plan die shrinks and power based on roadmaps with chip makers and the pro console doesn’t split up the base in any meaningful way. The main base is the ps5, the pro are for people who want more power.
- 1,731
- United Kingdom
well main reason why PS4 Pro existed was because the 4K TVs and they need more powerful machine to handle 4K res
PS5 Pro main thing will be better ray tracing and being more powerful in general especially for upcoming UE5 games , so there is a market for that and you don't really split the userbase when its still the same platform
Last edited:
- 2,298
- Germany
I dont like this buzzword, though this is of course only an opinion on my end:
I set every single current game to performance mode simply because playing on 30fps feels awkward to me.
If any new console can offer current "high spec" visuals at 60 or 120 instead of 30, this is what I would want for.
Not 30fps + ray tracing.
INEEDNAWZZZ
Premium
- 1,832
- Lincoln
- EGGSBAWCKS
- DigitalLuke64DD
There's been slim revisions of every PS console since the very beginning, it was always a given there was going to be one.
- 1,731
- United Kingdom
That's basically what the Pro will be , having ray tracing in higher framerates and in higher quality ofc + most future games will use UE5 way more demanding on hardware
That is true , always when parts get cheaper and smaller apu die then they have to create Slim to phase out the old original hardware
Last edited:
Similar threads
