- 20,681
- TenEightyOne
- TenEightyOne
You're right on the fact that these dollars go manufacturers and guess what, there is a term for that e.g. corporate welfare aka crony capitalism as oppose to free market capitalism.
First of all government cannot grow an economy only take from it. If this were the case then everybody in america would be extremely wealthy and no talk economic inequality(even though I don believe in it). That said any form of government "investment" only takes from and destroys a real economy as oppose to stimulating it via spending. I mean Brazil, Japan and the eurozone are prime examples of economic destruction via government spending.
That's a very circular argument. Home-tax-dollars going back into a home-economy is exactly how economies are grown.
Truth is, all of these "NASA innovations" are made possible via external contractors and individual inventors. In fact they've would've still existed even if NASA didn't exist. Sputnik? rocket technology?
So you think that rocket technology hasn't been advanced/reinvented since the days of Werner von Braun? That goes some way to explain the standpoint that you're arguing from... one that doesn't know what it's talking about, in my opinion.
Well done for naming the only two space-programme inventions in history though. Kinda.