"Standards" the good, the bad and the ugly
- Thread starter bodger
- 4,101 comments
- 933,719 views
- 1,448
I must say that I'm impressed by some of these standards. They're still not premium quality but at least they blend in nicely now instead of making you crash when you're blinded by the pixelation. The RUF Yellowbird and the Nissan R390 road car have been given some particularly detailed attention.
- 1,335
- WA
- TEAM-SWD-daus26
You know, I just had a thought. Standards probably won't carry over to GT7 on PS4. If that's true, then an iconic car such as the Supra will be gone! 
A Japanese GT game without a Toyota Supra?? PD why you no make this car premium yet?? It deserves as much recognition as the RX-7, STi, Evo, NSX, and Skyline. They were the ultimate 276hp-ish group. It's going to be an ugly argument, but I personally wish they would at least treat the outside like premium, as in the AMG Vision GT, in a way to carry as many cars as possible to next gen.
But wow, that RUF looks good.
A Japanese GT game without a Toyota Supra?? PD why you no make this car premium yet?? It deserves as much recognition as the RX-7, STi, Evo, NSX, and Skyline. They were the ultimate 276hp-ish group. It's going to be an ugly argument, but I personally wish they would at least treat the outside like premium, as in the AMG Vision GT, in a way to carry as many cars as possible to next gen.
But wow, that RUF looks good.
- 10,269
- Bonn
- GTAce
There's a Premium Supra, just no MKIV.You know, I just had a thought. Standards probably won't carry over to GT7 on PS4. If that's true, then an iconic car such as the Supra will be gone!
A Japanese GT game without a Toyota Supra?? PD why you no make this car premium yet?? It deserves as much recognition as the RX-7, STi, Evo, NSX, and Skyline. They were the ultimate 276hp-ish group. It's going to be an ugly argument, but I personally wish they would at least treat the outside like premium, as in the AMG Vision GT, in a way to carry as many cars as possible to next gen.
But wow, that RUF looks good.
They will introduce "new" cars in GT7 for sure, so we don't know if there will be a MKIV Supra or not.
TheeFrogmanlego
(Banned)
- 1,546
- Downey
- frogmanlego
- 459
- T2
- GregOr1971
- 551
- Hilversum, NL
- ROBENDEN2
Since GT3, it became a sort of tradition for me to buy a beige CL600. Nice to see they improved it this time
- 4,455
- São Paulo / Bra
- diegorborges82
Since GT3, it became a sort of tradition for me to buy a beige CL600. Nice to see they improved it this time
That's one classy tradition sir! 👍
- 82
- New York
- EpicHeelToe
Does anyone know how PD has set the weight balance on many of these "standards"? In GT5, many of them were set at the same 60/40 balance as if the programmers got lazy and didn't want to do the research. This caused many well-balanced cars to initially suffer from weird dynamics of being abnormally front heavy. The only way to cure the problem was to pull weight out of the car and play around with the ballast and weight balance. Can anyone check this out to see what they did and if they improved it?
shirakawaa
Premium
- 5,034
- GTP_shirakawaa
I doubt they improved anything there.
If they did, all cars would have proper default camber and toe settings as well.
johnmaxmanoy
(Banned)
- 316
- United States
Can you show me Furai GT5 vs GT6?
- 1,335
- WA
- TEAM-SWD-daus26
There's a Premium Supra, just no MKIV.
They will introduce "new" cars in GT7 for sure, so we don't know if there will be a MKIV Supra or not.
Lol, that's right. You got me. Yeah, I definitely meant the MKIV. Of course, we don't know if whether or not it'll be added in the future, but at this point, it's hard to believe. I don't see why it hasn't. My friend even has the Supra and he would be happy to lend to PD if finding one in Japan is a problem, which is of course not the case lol.. I mean probably not haha.
- 3,652
- PNW
- cowabungacorey
Courtesy of GT's Big Fan
johnmaxmanoy
(Banned)
- 316
- United States
CodeRedR51
Premium
- 55,281
- United States
