Thanks. Glad you're enjoying it.
Soo... This is what I said to a friend yesterday, just before I posted the fix for the road-going 2002, from Buja:
"This one is not as easy. Simple to fix the rear squat issue, but it generates a higher speed "swerve" reaction from the rear end which needs more work. I think for now, I'm going to just retro-fit the v1.1 rear suspension as a quick and dirty fix, cos that's quite stable. I'm probably the only one offended that it doesn't match reality anyway " << Got that wrong
Now
that car really used a nothing-like-reality setup, but after doing some research, I though Bazza's interpretation for the TCL 2002 was pretty accurate, within the constraints of AC's understanding of suspension fizix.
The real thing has a really beefy, box-section, angled trailing wishbone. There is no upper (second) wishbone.
The spring sits centrally in in a pocket, in the wishbone and the shock-absorber attaches behind the axle line. Like this:
My thought is that the inside leg of that wishbone is angled sufficiently to act as lateral control, and the short arc of the full deflection does not change the geometry enough to require an articulated upright, and upper lateral control arm. I
think.
So, how to duplicate that in AC? It's a bit like a spread wishbone with a strut, right? I've had some experience with that kind of setup trying to cure the HSS Lotus 16's terminal rear wheel camber change in the range of suspension movement, and I ended up having to make the trailing arm quite long, very close to the inside edge of the wheel and very close to directly front/back. Which would be REALLY unlike reality for this car.
Happily, smarter folks than me (Bazza, Velo et al) have already worked this out.
You make the bottom Wishbone really accurate. Then you make a second long, narrow, wishbone, separate the hub mount points by something like the length of the "upright", and mount it's feet on either side of the axle line. The feet end up on the other side of the car, lolz. It's
completely imaginary, but it controls the upper end of the hub laterally (cos AC can't understand the way BMW really did it it, requiring NO upper lateral control) almost like it's invisible.
So that's what the smart guys think. Which is why I left the TCL car alone in that respect. I'm actually thinking of using the TCL mount points as a better option on the Buja car, too. Cos that's
really fantasy.
But... That all said (and sorry, I'm a wordy sod
)
I'm very open to other ideas, and keen to give your suggestion a whirl.
So let me do that and drive it and come back to you.
PS. Off the bat, it looks quite a lot like the setup Buja tried, which yielded the rear rise under acceleration problem.