The F686/S is a car that does not exist.
Two things.
The only F686 was the F686/M, and it does not handle as well as the F094/S and it is not capable of a time like that. (That is without cutting corners, jumping the last chicane, or being a hybrid - so you did not get that time legally.)
Anyone who is anyone on GT3 will tell you the F094/S is the only NTSC car capable of such a time. (The PAL equivalent is the Polyphony 001)
And my time of 3'00.407 is a legal time and can be verified by it's SharkPort replay on this site. Hold a second and I'll give you a link.
Lightning - Complex String - F094/S - 3'00.407 - SharkPort Replay
Sorry buddy, if you think you can get away with that on this site, the community exposes things what you just claimed right away.
We know what cars can do what, and the F686/M (there is no S) cannot do a low 3 minute time let alone under 3 minutes cleanly.
(Now I've seen you change that to the F687/S - but still that car cannot do that time.)
And even though the /M has 973 HP compared to the F094/S 829 HP - the F094/S accelerates better than the /M as well. The only advantage the /M has is the fact it has higher top speed. (Same goes for the 687/S)
A 'picture' is not good enough for such proof when it comes to the online community.
And the reason why is because if you didn't know this Tuner, everyone knows about hybrids and they are illegal when it comes to 'records' and such.
And if you built a hybrid, use that same tool on my replay and you will see that mine is not one. It's a legal, original F094/S.
(That is why I do not care for the fact the video does not show speed there Tuner, because I have the SharkPort replay which can have it verified 100%)
To give you an idea how 'well' I know the F1s tuner....
Up until like 2 days ago, I had the GVS WR with a 1'15.474 when another fast guy (on a controller) did a 1'15.406 lap. (Although I still hold #1 and #2 for the MR drivetrain.)
1 Lightning Nissan 1998 R390 GT1 LM Race Car 1205 MT MR 1/6/05 12:35 AM Logitech GT Force 1:22.755
2 Lightning Toyota 1999 GT-One (TS020) Race Car 1350 MT MR 1/6/05 4:52 PM Logitech GT Force 1:23.133
3 ROXA_ICE Nissan 1998 R390 GT1 LM Race Car 1205 MT MR 9/3/02 2:08 PM Dual Shock 2 1:23.767
4 Mr P Nissan 1998 R390 GT1 LM Race Car 1205 MT MR 10/2/03 4:59 PM Dual Shock 2 1:23.799
5 XtremeD63 Nissan 1998 R390 GT1 LM Race Car 1205 MT MR 10/4/03 8:50 AM Dual Shock 2 1:23.973
And actually, 3rd belongs to Slowpoke over from hgt.themaille.com
3 Slowpoke USA Nissan R390 GT1 LM RaceCar Steering Wheel 01.23.292 19 17 Oct 2004 NTSC
But.....
There are not many (only a handful) of people who have ever gotten under 1'17 and very few under 1'18.
I got a 1'17.341 at GVS in the
F687/S
And how well do I know the /M?
These are the 5 top F1 times at Midfield from GT3.GTTIMES.COM, and by the way, all 5 are legal times. I've seen bip p and fist_of_rage's runs, 3rdgenracerX I know is legit, and of course I am. So these times are all legal.
1 Lightning 1994 F094/S F1 Car 829 MT SP 1/12/05 10:25 PM Logitech GT Force 0:48.690
2 3rdgenracerX 1994 F094/S F1 Car 829 AT SP 2/7/04 10:20 PM Dual Shock 2 0:48.703
3 fist_of_rage 1994 F094/S F1 Car 829 MT SP 8/8/03 9:40 PM Dual Shock 2 0:48.787
4 big p Polyphony 001 F1 Car (PAL) 829 MT SP 6/30/03 11:13 AM Dual Shock 2 0:48.985
5 Lightning 1986 F686/M F1 Car 973 MT SP 2/1/05 2:51 PM Logitech GT Force 0:49.024
Even at Midfield, the F686/M did not beat the F094/S.
And here are the F686/M times that are in the top 100.
5 Lightning 1986 F686/M F1 Car 973 MT SP 2/1/05 2:51 PM Logitech GT Force 0:49.024
8 3rdgenracerX 1986 F686/M F1 Car 973 AT SP 5/4/04 1:52 AM Dual Shock 2 0:49.144
31 UB57 1986 F686/M F1 Car 973 MT SP 4/28/04 7:36 PM Other wheel 0:50.188
49 gandyxxandy 1986 F686/M F1 Car 973 AT SP 5/11/04 8:03 PM Dual Shock 2 0:50.610
64 tuff240 1986 F686/M F1 Car 973 AT SP 11/10/04 8:18 AM Dual Shock 2 0:50.930
79 CFM 1986 F686/M F1 Car 973 MT SP 4/28/04 9:16 AM Dual Shock 2 0:51.239
95 Sough 1986 F686/M F1 Car 973 AT SP 1/25/03 12:33 AM Dual Shock 2 0:51.543
Notice, same result for the guy who has 2nd at Midfield. In the F686/M he is only a little behind me as well.
Tried and true Tuner, F094/S beats the F686/M hands down. (And the 687/S - I do not want to think if I have 1.9 seconds on it at GVS - it would probably be like 5-6 seconds behind at Complex if I'd have run it.)
Order of NTSC F1's from best to worst.
1: F094/S (PAL equiv - Polyphony 001)
2: F686/M - Has more top end HP (973), higher top speed, decent handling
3: F687/S - The real surprise, has only 1.25 rear downforce.
And 929 HP (If it had 1.50 rear downforce, it WOULD beat the 94/S)
4: F094/H - Yes, this is a surprise here, but that is true. The /H
suffers from having the same HP as the F094/S, but does not handle as well. (Although it's barely quicker in a straight line). The /H's real problem is that it cannot take corners ANYWHERE near the 94/S.
5: F688/S (PAL equiv - Polyphony 002)
6: F090/S