I think the take away here is this. Some lefty writes an op-ed about the virtues of exposing young children to adult sexual matter, the conservatives call the lefty out,
What's deserving of condemnation, Helen? If public exhibition of something is permissible by law, and it likely is, why do you have an issue with others not shielding their children from it?
That's called calling someone out.
Not really, rather common here.
This is a strawman. You've taken the thing I said and twisted it into something I didn't say so that you might gain an advantage in an argument. This is deceitful. You also dodged the question.
I gather this is a continuation of the aforementioned strawman. Having said that, I think it's probative. I think meaningful discussion on the subject may be had in another thread, since this one isn't likely to be appropriate, but perhaps you could first answer the questions of mine that you've dodged--they're not limited to that which you opted to strawman.
The notion that I "called him out" has decidedly negative connotations. Care to explain?
This isn't a logical response to the part of my post that you quoted. I get the sense that you didn't understand one or more of the words in my post that you quoted. Maybe respond to the questions I asked instead, because it's the absence of the response that I solicited that makes your grievance peculiar.
Explained in the post you quoted.
It's pretty clear why "demonic" is being used to describe this event.
I would honestly find that very entertaining, but at the same time, I and/or my hypothetical child would not be required to attend said story hour, just the same as I and/or my hypothetical child would not be required to attend a kink-friendly Pride parade. I'm not responsible for what other people's kids are exposed to, that onus primarily falls upon the guardian. As long as it's all on the up-and-up, I don't see an issue.
You talk a big game of playing victim whilst trying to invite the other nutjob from your echo chamber elsewhere about how you "swat" down everyone here on your own.
You calling me gay doesn't really surprise me, but it doesn't bother me either. In the even that such a thing might offend me, I'd take you being the source into consideration.
This is overly broad. What are these supposed "sexual themed things" and in what context are they being done in front of children?
Nobody has given personal information on the platform of which @McLaren speaks. Yes, I've seen it as well. It's public.
He expressed opposition to a social media platform exercising its constitutionally protected right to moderate user generated content. This is a popular topic among conservatives. A new social media platform founded by conservatives acknowledges its constitutionally protected right to moderate user generated content, and I wanted to know if he maintains his opposition.
It's apparent that you don't know what this means. You actually did. You accused a user of posting private conversations publicly, and when that failed because they hadn't done that, you accused the user of digging up dirt. From a public forum. That the other user links to.
I know. You inserted yourself into it. And you've been engaging in bad faith.
Personal attack.
I did? How did I? I don't know it even now.
At the risk of being accused of piling on because expressing a consenting opinion is apparently piling on these days, drag queen Danny La Rue actually received an Order of the British Empire award from the Queen of England for starring in children's pantomime fairytale plays from the sixties onwards. Nobody got their sequinned panties in a bunch over this far as I can recall.
You don't have to be gay to support equality for other people. Also @ryzno, if you think this is a pile on, wait until people discover your post in the Covid thread saying that you think 605,000 deaths in the US so far are a "big nothing burger".
Now that's just wonderful.
Depends on the context. If it's a public, legally-sanctioned event that people and/or children have free will in whether or not they want to attend, and said "sexual-themed things" are happening between consenting adults, then I don't see an issue.
I told you not to share your FB because you might be sharing your personal information to a giant audience here (where you live, what you do). Nothing I shared revealed Chrunch's personal information. I didn't even have to dig it up; it was literally a click away in his signature for his racing series forum where he also had a political thread.
The Hunt is finely coming to HBO Max on July 8th!!!!
Okay.
