No problem...
I'l never post again.
Forgive me for posting photos and taking time to discuss how the demo looks different than the media.
If I am a troll you are a bunch of fanboys.....
Have fun with the poorly lit, not 1080p, not 60fps, jaggy, flickery demo.....
I hope the prologue looks better and hope that someone from PD notices that we want the game to look like the media not like the demo.
but hey you guys are happy with the demo.
Do not bother ignoring.....
last post...
Now you're going Emo kid on us?
You gotta admit you make it very difficult for yourself when you make up stuff like saying the game isn't 60 FPS, when it IS 60 FPS a good 99.9% of the time, and say the game is "flickery" which umm, unless you're refering to something else is just flat out not true, there is no "flicker" in this game. (i'm assuming you are smart enough to not run the game at an interlaced resolution.)
Jaggies? if you're reffering to the low res shadows then yeah, definitly. the cars don't look as bad as they did in GTHD though.
Then you say stuff like forza looks smoother than GT5

, when everyone that's ever played Forza 2 knows that the framerate in that game is far less consistent than the one in *any* GT game, including GT5

.
This WAS pointed out to you in previous posts, and you flat out ignored this and still go on mumbling that it's not 60 FPS, it really makes me wonder if you even know what FPS is at all if you can't tell the difference.
Yes, it's not true 1080p, and in my book it shouldn't even be true 720p if it meant that they would get more shaders out of the RSX, since to get realistic lightning effects they'd need that fillrate for that instead of just extra res.
I also explained to you why the media can and has looked different, yes it's missleading. it's photomode on video, and PD should clarify this or just not use that method at all.