- 15,176
- Grandville Mi
- Gotbeefboy564
- Got beef boy564
Some wagons I saw from different shows of 2019
It's amazing what Dick Teague was able to accomplish at AMC with such a limited budget. I love how the grills on these two wagons are horizontal reflections, the tops and bottoms mirroring each other. The '65-6 grill even carries the illusion to the chrome trim on the front of the fenders. Beautiful.Back on the subject of Ramblers, the '65-6 Ambassador Cross Country is a very cool thing.
'67-8s aren't bad either, and they got the new V8. I think the earlier front end is more attractive.
Isn’t that more of a hatchback though?View attachment 897157
Mazda protege 5 wagon. I think they're pretty cool
It's a wagon.Isn’t that more of a hatchback though?
I’m not so sure I agree. After all, it has similar dimensions to the 5-door Golf and no one would consider that a wagon.It's a wagon.
A two-box four-door with an additional side window and pillar aft of the rear door's trailing pillar is a wagon.
Oof, gottum.
It is a blurry line, but I think cars such as the Familia Hatch, A3 Sportback and the 1st gen Kia Rio Hatchback(although I think this is more Wagon then the others) fit probably in some middle ground between the two, all 3 are claimed to be hatchbacks from the manufacturer and look like it, but the text book definition doesn't seem right used on such cars.Oof, gottum.
Providing a singular example from an entity with a reputation for pushing conventions doesn't actually counter the convention.
Wagons--and by this I mean cars that are generally accepted as wagons--often have hatchbacks. Does this define them as hatchbacks?
Also, cars that are generally accepted as hatchbacks are actually sedans. Are hatchbacked wagons sedans?
You can play semantics, but I think it's pretty clear to tell whether or not a car is a hatchback or an estate just by looking at it. Nevertheless, "estate" and "hatchback" are not synonymous and are two completely separate classes of vehicles. The Mazda Protege5/323F/Ford Laser/Familia, despited being badged as "S-Wagon" was classed as a hatchback.Oof, gottum.
Providing a singular example from an entity with a reputation for pushing conventions doesn't actually counter the convention.
Wagons--and by this I mean cars that are generally accepted as wagons--often have hatchbacks. Does this define them as hatchbacks?
Also, cars that are generally accepted as hatchbacks are actually sedans. Are hatchbacked wagons sedans?
To complicate matters further, sedans can and often do have only two doors.
"I know it when I see it"? Define it.You can play semantics, but I think it's pretty clear to tell whether or not a car is a hatchback or an estate just by looking at it. Nevertheless, "estate" and "hatchback" are not synonymous and are two completely separate classes of vehicles. The Mazda Protege5/323F/Ford Laser/Familia, despited being badged as "S-Wagon" was classed as a hatchback.
Estate:
View attachment 897166
Hatchback:
View attachment 897167
Most of the "definition" derives from the visual aspect. An estate is the same basic concept of a hatchback (usually based on a sedan, seats five, prioritizes practicality and cargo space) but is visibly longer. The roofline of an estate is always longer than that of a hatchback, which is the entire point of an estate, making for greater interior and trunk space. Hatchbacks also tend to have a sloping rear while the rear of an estate is more upright. There's a reason why there's no such thing as a subcompact estate or a full-size hatchback."I know it when I see it"? Define it.
Not sure about that:There's a reason why there's no such thing as a subcompact estate or a full-size hatchback.
Well, there’s exceptions to everything I guess. The Vel Satis was quite a strange and proportionally ugly car for what it was. Clearly, the full-size hatchback idea never caught on, because you know... full size and hatchback don’t exactly go together.
The more conventional looking Opel Signum was borderline at that size as well, some kind of luxury hatchback thing European car makers where going with back in the mid 2000sWell, there’s exceptions to everything I guess. The Vel Satis was quite a strange and proportionally ugly car for what it was. Clearly, the full-size hatchback idea never caught on, because you know... full size and hatchback don’t exactly go together.
Slightly over 180 inches is hardly full-size, but nevertheless, that was quite an awkward time for European non-luxury cars in general, save the C6 and a few others.The more conventional looking Opel Signum was borderline at that size as well, some kind of luxury hatchback thing European car makers where going with back in the mid 2000s
It used a long wheelbase being based on a Vectra Estate, but the hatchback design means it isn't going to be long.Slightly over 180 inches is hardly full-size, but nevertheless, that was quite an awkward time for European non-luxury cars in general, save the C6 and a few others.