I don't know the proper term of this but I'm just going to call it the "Digimon/Pokemon anime style virtue debate".
To use the name as example, there are many times when I hear an argument that the Digimon anime is better because "its a continuous narrative where Pokemon just filler". Which isnt actually a virtue for either show, you literally just said the shows writing style. Digimon is a serialized adventure show while Pokemon is an episodic adventure show with continuity in the mix. A show isnt inherently better just because its serialized, you just prefer one writing style over the other
Can you compare Digimon and Pokemon? Absolutely, characters, themes (to an extent), music can all be comparable but its a little tricky to discuss the virtues of both shows when you only compare them on whether or not they are serialized.
This came about in my mind after discussing our favourite shows that been on Cartoon Network. Someone said Steven Universe, I said Sonic Boom. I said I couldnt get into Steven Universe because I really didnt like the Diamond story and how that story encompasses the series and its characters so it was hard for me to not look passed. His reason for why Steven Universe is better than Boom is because "nothing goes on and doesnt have super intense moments", which Boom is a Slice of Life self aware comedy, how is it a bad thing it doesnt have it when it isnt trying to have that in the first place, youre just talking about the different writing styles, not how they applied it?