Never happen. If you can repackage 90% of the content, throw in a couple of new tracks associated with bikes like Jerez, Assen etc. and sell it for $39.95 why would PD even entertain the idea of packaging the two together? It's not about making people happy, it's about how to make the most money from the idea.All they would need to do is just have the option to race with cars or motorcycles, or a combination of both. Then, everyone is happy because the people who don't want to race with motorcycles are satisfied as well as the people who want to race with both on the track or a motorcycle-only race.
Yup, clearly much better together.
If it's seen as a viable and profitable option in the eyes of PD (or whoever makes those decisions), sure, but we don't know that. If I recall correctly, TT underperformed sales wise and that will probably taken into consideration by the suits. It's a rather niche sub-genre after all; something we have to be realistic about, unfortunately.Better for you but not for PD and a majority of other players.
PD is a business, not a charity. There aims are to make as much money as possible and the best way to do that would be to release a new title rather than releasing DLC only a handful of people would buy.
Most importantly - Isle of Man, the track associated with the title ''Tourist Trophy''.tracks associated with bikes
Yes it would be sort of half assed but still interesting because riding physics model in TT was awesome, better than most bike games.I feel like...
STANDARD bikes from TT (ps2) imported to GT6!! lol
You should understand that there is a very simple correlation between these two things.Never happen. If you can repackage 90% of the content, throw in a couple of new tracks associated with bikes like Jerez, Assen etc. and sell it for $39.95 why would PD even entertain the idea of packaging the two together? It's not about making people happy, it's about how to make the most money from the idea.
Yeah, the simple correlation is, maximum profit always wins. The customer is happiest getting the most product for the cheapest price. The producer is interested in the maximum profit margin based on anticipated sales...which rarely, if ever, includes wrapping a marginal game like TT into a hugely successful franchise like GT. The most profit is in the separate game...and it won't taint the GT name if it's a flop.You should understand that there is a very simple correlation between these two things.
I'm the last person that needs an uneducated lesson on marketing principles.Yeah, the simple correlation is, maximum profit always wins. The customer is happiest getting the most product for the cheapest price. The producer is interested in the maximum profit margin based on anticipated sales...which rarely, if ever, includes wrapping a marginal game like TT into a hugely successful franchise like GT. The most profit is in the separate game...and it won't taint the GT name if it's a flop.
Formula 1, cart racing, stock car racing, tour car racing, and rally racing don't belong in the same game either but....Don't belong in the same game, separate title yes.
Formula 1, cart racing, stock car racing, tour car racing, and rally racing don't belong in the same game either but....
....that need to race in separate races.At least they're all cars...
The reason for including TT2 in GT is because it would be more cost effective, and therefore more likely to happen outright.and you can do that. They'd be better of just making TT2. Bikes have as much place in GT as a shopping cart.
Bikes are raced on Laguna Seca multiple times every year in real life and no one ever stepped in and said "sorry, this track will only work for cars"and you can do that. They'd be better of just making TT2. Bikes have as much place in GT as a shopping cart.