Castrol96
(Banned)
- 2,899
- Southampton, UK
Looks short and stubby.
Looks like a chassis of a GT 86.
Looks short and stubby.
I think that looks really good. The rear could be less angry, but I'd be satisfied with such a design.
If Toyota actually badge this thing as a Supra this will be the Mustang Mk2 of Supras.
Yeah but the Mk3 was still a big step up in performance and class.nahh that be the pig that was the Mk3.
They just need to slap a Supra badge on the ft1 and call it a day.
Yeah but the Mk3 was still a big step up in performance and class.
This car is smaller and more resembles a Celica.
Yeah thats a given because sports cars in general have gained soo much power and performance since then, but if it where to maintain the level of the Mk4 for its time period it should be Nissan GT-R level, but being based on a BMW Z4 that's not going to happen.I don't think you could really call the MK.V the Pintostang of Supras because it'll still be considerably faster than any of it's predecessors.
Well you can't really see about 1.5 inches of difference in the photo, and since the cars are facing the camera you can't see the length difference either.Even though that picture is lies
True, however if they go for slightly less power, less complex system and sell it for much cheaper, they'll sell a crap ton of them.but if it where to maintain the level of the Mk4 for its time period it should be Nissan GT-R level
They haven't proven that lately though.I personally don't think these renderings will do the actual sheet-metal car justice. Toyota has proven they can make very good-looking cars in the past, and I hope that it'll remain the same.
The prototype in this video sounds like it's got a turbocharged inline-4 under the hood (same as the Z5 later on)
Looks like it has a wart on its nose.