Toyota Supra (A90)

  • Thread starter RocZX
  • 2,734 comments
  • 278,853 views
Wish Toyota didn't keep that cognac interior exclusive to the MT Edition Supra... At least limited at all for either MT or interior color. At least they brought in a new color for the regular Supra range. Stratospheric Blue for the 2023 model year. I am a sucker for brighter blues, was never really a fan of the A91 Edition blue or the dark blue on the first model years.
2023-toyota-supra-stratospheric-blue-1651243638.jpg


 
A tiny bit more info about Supra enhancements.

As a side, interesting that 50 units, of the GT4 customer car, were sold at the end of 2021. Will be an interesting comparison when the Z gets homologated.
 
This car just became 100x more desirable to me because of the stick shift. I’m iffy about the BMW parts for long term ownership but I hope I can get one of these before everything goes electric.
 


$55K Mach One
$56K Supra

Just wait for the, "People don't drive like that on the street. In the real world, the Mustang would walk all over it." or "Put me behind the wheel if that Mustang and that Supra would be seeing my taillights!"
 

No price difference between transmission choice.

2023 Toyota GR Supra Australian pricing​

  • GR Supra GT manual/auto – $87,000
  • GR Supra GTS manual/auto – $97,000
 
I don't see the appeal of the Supra when the new Z exists...
I can. The Z is on a platform dating back to 2001 with pretty minimal updates. The Z doesn't like extended periods of high performance driving, it's not as fast as its numbers would suggest, it's big and bulky, it doesn't brake very well, and for some people it doesn't look very good either. The new Z is a lot more like the 300ZX, a cruiser more than a carver.

The Supra is way more of a sports car than the Z is, the front-engined equivalent of a Porsche Cayman. It has a better engine, it has a better automatic transmission, it has more tuning potential, and it has a far more sophisticated platform.

Neither of them would be my first choice in a sports car, but I would pick the Supra over the Z.
 
interesting, you make the Z look like a relic..

But even if I bought a Supra, I wouldn't modify it till it aged. With a Z it looks more streamlined and the seat is lower to the ground giving you a better feel of the forces around a corner. The supra uses an old bmw engine, which is great for modifying I hear but that doesn't interest me if you don't modify it. I actually don't like the look of the supra's rear taillights and fascia where the Z appeals to me, though the front could use a little work, it looks more timeless than the supra with it's heavy spartan looks.

The Z also would keep up with the supra with a better set of tires and a driver mod

What would be your top 5 choices instead of these two?
 
Last edited:
interesting, you make the Z look like a relic..

But even if I bought a Supra, I wouldn't modify it till it aged. With a Z it looks more streamlined and the seat is lower to the ground giving you a better feel of the forces around a corner. The supra uses an old bmw engine, which is great for modifying I hear but that doesn't interest me if you don't modify it. I actually don't like the look of the supra's rear taillights and fascia where the Z appeals to me, though the front could use a little work, it looks more timeless than the supra with it's heavy spartan looks.

The Z also would keep up with the supra with a better set of tires and a driver mod

What would be your top 5 choices instead of these two?
To be brutally honest, the Z is kind of a relic - it's core engineering was done in the 1990s. I don't dislike the Z, but all-new it certainly isn't. Even the VR30 engine is a development of the VQ series. The B58 BMW engine debuted in 2015 and is substantially different vs the old N series engines (notably the B58 is closed deck, whereas the VR and VQ series engines are open deck).

I would take a 718 Cayman base over either the Supra or Z. Not sure there are 5 competitors to pick from in the category. :lol:
 
The Z is on a platform dating back to 2001 with pretty minimal updates.
See, I don't understand people's issue with this. If it works, it works. And it would have been changed quite a lot to increase rigidity and improve crash safety. Which makes no difference versus an all new chassis.

Also: cost savings. Both of these cars would not have happened without it. For Nissan that was reusing the same platform and an existing drivetrain. For Toyota it was partnering with BMW to share development costs.
 
See, I don't understand people's issue with this. If it works, it works. And it would have been changed quite a lot to increase rigidity and improve crash safety. Which makes no difference versus an all new chassis.

Also: cost savings. Both of these cars would not have happened without it. For Nissan that was reusing the same platform and an existing drivetrain. For Toyota it was partnering with BMW to share development costs.
The reliability and how much it costs to fix in the long term are the big question marks for me. The Z seems like the smarter choice if you plan on keeping it for awhile, I don’t trust anything with BMW parts. I still love this car though.
 
Last edited:
M240i/M2

You could probably toss in the Mustang GT as well.
The issue personally with the mustang is it's good at eating pedestrians, too much car for most people. You could put on better tires etc but then it's modified and that's a money pit I'd stay away from.
 
Last edited:
You can certainly weld additional body structure and bolt bracing to an existing platform to increase rigidity and crashworthiness to it and make it similar to a new spun up platform, but we certainly shouldn't be pretending that that's not a major factor why the Z35 is a front heavy 3500lb+ car when it's main competitor is the identically sized, much better balanced 3400lb Zupra; even ignoring stuff like cargo space and forced body hard points. GM probably could still have used the C4 chassis up through the C6 generation if they didn't mind putting 400 pounds of chassis bracing on it; and nothing likely was stopping Porsche from using the 996 chassis to this day with ever-wider bodyshells installed.








The true travesty is that GM had this solved with the current Camaro but saddled it with the same cartoonish styling of the Zeta car instead of something contemporary that didn't horrendously compromise the car and make it look like a face-lift of the previous generation.
 
Last edited:
Toyota will allegedly make a GRMN version of the Supra before the next generation which will be an midship RWD EV in 2025. These are just rumors so nothing is confirmed yet. But this will align with the Porsche 718 going EV at the same time


A new report from Best Car claims Toyota has not given up on the idea of introducing a derivative carrying the "Gazoo Racing Meister of Nürburgring" suffix. It's bound to happen before 2025 as that year will allegedly see the introduction of a next-generation Supra devoid of combustion engines.

The Supra GRMN is expected to serve as the swan song for the fifth-generation model and have somewhere in the region of 543 horsepower as the Japanese magazine speculates it'll pack 550 PS. Logic tells us Toyota will borrow the S58 engine from BMW M where the twin-turbo 3.0-liter mill produces the same output in the M4 CSL and the M3 CS. The Bavarians also use this engine with an extra 10 ponies in the ultra-exclusive 3.0 CSL while the new M2 boasts a detuned configuration of the same inline-six.

Best Car claims the Supra Mk6 will retain the rear-wheel-drive layout but switch to midship proportions. It's said to ride on an evolution of the e-TNGA platform and do away with the combustion engine altogether. Chances are it won't be related to the Sports EV as the exciting concept unveiled in late 2021 with Gazoo Racing branding seemed smaller.

Take the report with the proverbial pinch of salt, especially since it seems a bit drastic to jump from a pure ICE setup to a completely electric drivetrain. Toyota has been adamant combustion engines still have a future in the automotive industry, so we wouldn't necessarily rule out a hybrid powertrain. If the Supra does indeed go electric in 2025, it'll mirror the next-gen Porsche 718 Boxster/Cayman EV slated to come out the same year.

In the meantime, Toyota's luxury division Lexus is working on an all-electric LFA replacement with a simulated manual gearbox. Previewed by the Electrified Sport concept, the zero-emission supercar will also boast all-wheel drive and brake-by-wire when it arrives later this decade.
 
It’s good the Supra has the option. Kind of weak that the lesser GR cars have manuals and at the time, the Supra did not. Now, it’s flipped, where autos are coming for the other GR models.
 

I feel pretty indifferent to this car now, I just hope they don't do a partnership with BMW for the next one too.
I don't understand why all these journalists are talking about the Supra ending in 2026, while speculating over what Toyota's concept GT3 car cOuLd PoSiBlY bE????

It's painfully obvious. The GT3 car is the next Supra, and it's going to share its platform with the Lexus RC. The Lexus will have a V8, the Toyota may or may not.

Toyota entered the sports car market with partnerships because sports cars are always risky moves, but they found great market success with both the GR86 and the Supra. Now the partnership with Subaru is over but there is every expectation for the GR86 to live on, with rumors swirling about a sedan and a move upmarket. The engine which makes sense and which the market has been screaming for is the 3-cylinder turbo. Now we're talking about the S-FR effectively replacing the GR86 as a lower-rung and genuine Miata competitor.

The Supra is also going to live on but will likely move upmarket and become a higher-performance car overall, and likely a hybrid. The car and nameplate easily have the potential to do battle in the market with Porsche and Corvette, rather than Mustangs. It's almost like journalists have been paid by Toyota to act dumb about all this. Speculation was the same concerning the LCs and new 4Runner, journalists just couldn't wrap their head around what a new 4Runner might look like or be based on despite customers having 100% certainty that the status quo would remain of the 4Runner being the same as the Tacoma. A similar platform sharing solution for the Supra and market shift for the GR86 are the only ways any of this makes financial sense so the choice is clear.

Less likely aspects of this platform sharing will be that Mazda debuts a sports car on the same platform as this GT3 concept/future Supra/future RC, because the evidence for that is already piled up though Mazda is not quite strong enough financially to risk a high-end sports car without a partnership. Another less likely thing is that the S-FR shares the ND (or NE) platform. The S-FR could be the "coupe Miata" that many people want, while the Miata itself continues as the traditional convertible and targa. Of the three, I would still prefer the Mazda nameplate and targa roof. Ultimately this could possibly be an even trade for the two companies and would help complete Mazda's more premium lineup.
 
Last edited:
Back