But hey easier comparing the 51k mkv to a 35k mustang then 59k GT350
A 50k camaro or mustang with annihilate this car in any performance test. Go check for your self the car you can build.
How about equally priced Mustang or Camaro, those things will maul the mkv.
$55K Mach One
$56K Supra
I can. The Z is on a platform dating back to 2001 with pretty minimal updates. The Z doesn't like extended periods of high performance driving, it's not as fast as its numbers would suggest, it's big and bulky, it doesn't brake very well, and for some people it doesn't look very good either. The new Z is a lot more like the 300ZX, a cruiser more than a carver.I don't see the appeal of the Supra when the new Z exists...
To be brutally honest, the Z is kind of a relic - it's core engineering was done in the 1990s. I don't dislike the Z, but all-new it certainly isn't. Even the VR30 engine is a development of the VQ series. The B58 BMW engine debuted in 2015 and is substantially different vs the old N series engines (notably the B58 is closed deck, whereas the VR and VQ series engines are open deck).interesting, you make the Z look like a relic..
But even if I bought a Supra, I wouldn't modify it till it aged. With a Z it looks more streamlined and the seat is lower to the ground giving you a better feel of the forces around a corner. The supra uses an old bmw engine, which is great for modifying I hear but that doesn't interest me if you don't modify it. I actually don't like the look of the supra's rear taillights and fascia where the Z appeals to me, though the front could use a little work, it looks more timeless than the supra with it's heavy spartan looks.
The Z also would keep up with the supra with a better set of tires and a driver mod
What would be your top 5 choices instead of these two?
M240i/M2I would take a 718 Cayman base over either the Supra or Z. Not sure there are 5 competitors to pick from in the category.
M2 is close but the Mustang GT is way off IMO. Nice car, but not the same.M240i/M2
You could probably toss in the Mustang GT as well.
See, I don't understand people's issue with this. If it works, it works. And it would have been changed quite a lot to increase rigidity and improve crash safety. Which makes no difference versus an all new chassis.The Z is on a platform dating back to 2001 with pretty minimal updates.
The reliability and how much it costs to fix in the long term are the big question marks for me. The Z seems like the smarter choice if you plan on keeping it for awhile, I don’t trust anything with BMW parts. I still love this car though.See, I don't understand people's issue with this. If it works, it works. And it would have been changed quite a lot to increase rigidity and improve crash safety. Which makes no difference versus an all new chassis.
Also: cost savings. Both of these cars would not have happened without it. For Nissan that was reusing the same platform and an existing drivetrain. For Toyota it was partnering with BMW to share development costs.
The issue personally with the mustang is it's good at eating pedestrians, too much car for most people. You could put on better tires etc but then it's modified and that's a money pit I'd stay away from.M240i/M2
You could probably toss in the Mustang GT as well.
A new report from Best Car claims Toyota has not given up on the idea of introducing a derivative carrying the "Gazoo Racing Meister of Nürburgring" suffix. It's bound to happen before 2025 as that year will allegedly see the introduction of a next-generation Supra devoid of combustion engines.
The Supra GRMN is expected to serve as the swan song for the fifth-generation model and have somewhere in the region of 543 horsepower as the Japanese magazine speculates it'll pack 550 PS. Logic tells us Toyota will borrow the S58 engine from BMW M where the twin-turbo 3.0-liter mill produces the same output in the M4 CSL and the M3 CS. The Bavarians also use this engine with an extra 10 ponies in the ultra-exclusive 3.0 CSL while the new M2 boasts a detuned configuration of the same inline-six.
Best Car claims the Supra Mk6 will retain the rear-wheel-drive layout but switch to midship proportions. It's said to ride on an evolution of the e-TNGA platform and do away with the combustion engine altogether. Chances are it won't be related to the Sports EV as the exciting concept unveiled in late 2021 with Gazoo Racing branding seemed smaller.
Take the report with the proverbial pinch of salt, especially since it seems a bit drastic to jump from a pure ICE setup to a completely electric drivetrain. Toyota has been adamant combustion engines still have a future in the automotive industry, so we wouldn't necessarily rule out a hybrid powertrain. If the Supra does indeed go electric in 2025, it'll mirror the next-gen Porsche 718 Boxster/Cayman EV slated to come out the same year.
In the meantime, Toyota's luxury division Lexus is working on an all-electric LFA replacement with a simulated manual gearbox. Previewed by the Electrified Sport concept, the zero-emission supercar will also boast all-wheel drive and brake-by-wire when it arrives later this decade.
Thank you for admitting that BMW is inherently weak.Kind of weak
Europe, North America, and Japan. Selected by customers participating in GT4 championships and #スーパー耐久 around the world, cumulative production reached 100 units.
I don't understand why all these journalists are talking about the Supra ending in 2026, while speculating over what Toyota's concept GT3 car cOuLd PoSiBlY bE????Toyota GR Supra And BMW Z4 To Ride Off Into The Sunset In 2026 | Carscoops
While Toyota wouldn't confirm the news, an official said they're evaluating what's nextwww.carscoops.com
I feel pretty indifferent to this car now, I just hope they don't do a partnership with BMW for the next one too.