If your HDD dies I'll send you the one that came with my PS3.
As for the "discussion" at hand: If the Black Edition traps 169, and the Spec V beats the Black Edition, why is it so hard to believe it's possible for it to trap 170? I know it's possible to trap 164+ on the R34, but it doesn't mean that it is faster than a 162 or 163 tune. I feel like you guys are doing this just to single out Shells.
I don't have a Spec V, just a Black Edition, otherwise I would've tried tuning mine to match his. I can understand your skepticism on something running faster than you think it can, but I've seen cars do strange things on this game since I started tuning. 4WD cars that wheelie, RWD cars that bunny hop the back wheels, cars that wheelie so hard they flip over and respawn you on the track. Each update changes certain things so, even if trap number is higher on his car than yours, it doesn't mean his is really faster - just that he has different ratios. I'll buy the car tonight and set a tune on it to see for myself, against my hatred of GTRs.You might call it singling someone out, but that is only the case if multiple people make the same claim and I target one person specifically. Here we have one person making the claim. How is that singling someone one out ?
I take it your Spec V doesn't do 170/171 Master_Shake ?
Don't misunderstand me, I will be happy to be proven wrong but its going to take more than a screenshot to convince me.
I don't have a Spec V, just a Black Edition, otherwise I would've tried tuning mine to match his. I can understand your skepticism on something running faster than you think it can, but I've seen cars do strange things on this game since I started tuning. 4WD cars that wheelie, RWD cars that bunny hop the back wheels, cars that wheelie so hard they flip over and respawn you on the track. Each update changes certain things so, even if trap number is higher on his car than yours, it doesn't mean his is really faster - just that he has different ratios. I'll buy the car tonight and set a tune on it to see for myself, against my hatred of GTRs.
Zr1 traps 172 now, what's the trap for a vr4, just started tuning and I got 123, I need more or less?Dodge acr 170-174
Dodge gts 02 168-172
Dodge viper 03 173-175
Dodge gts 13 168-172
Chevrolet z06 167-171
Chevolet zr1 170-173
Ferrari enzo 172-174
599 155-159
Nissan
Gtr 09 165-168
Gtr 12 165-168
2seater 156-160
Toyota
Supra 156-164
Mazda
Rx7 150-155
Considering you start infront of the yellow line instead of behind it, you actually need the nose on the back of the shadow to get the true speed. Each car would be 2 MPH slower than it is if measured like that. Even though competitions are compared right at the beginning of the shadow, trap speed "at the shadow" would refer to the car being under it.Decided to look more into Shells picture posted and I believe this confusion has all come about from where people are measuring speeds from. Numbers do climb pretty quick at the top like mikey mentioned. View attachment 170544
Considering you start infront of the yellow line instead of behind it, you actually need the nose on the back of the shadow to get the true speed. Each car would be 2 MPH slower than it is if measured like that. Even though competitions are compared right at the beginning of the shadow, trap speed "at the shadow" would refer to the car being under it.
It makes complete sense. Under the shadow would be a lot harder for judges to see who was ahead, but right at the beginning you can visually measure distance from shadow to nose on both cars. However, during regular races, most people wont even brake until completely out from under the shadow. The measurement on Indy is from the yellow hashed lines to the first line of shadow, but we start ahead of them because we spin if we're on yellow. In order to complete the race, we have to be a car length after the "should be here" line on your picture. It's confusing to explain what happens in milliseconds online, but you'll realize what I'm trying to explain when you race someone.That doesn't make sense. Why have two points of reference depending on being competition or not ?
Anyway, mystery solved. We are measuring at different spots.
It makes complete sense. Under the shadow would be a lot harder for judges to see who was ahead, but right at the beginning you can visually measure distance from shadow to nose on both cars. However, during regular races, most people wont even brake until completely out from under the shadow. The measurement on Indy is from the yellow hashed lines to the first line of shadow, but we start ahead of them because we spin if we're on yellow. In order to complete the race, we have to be a car length after the "should be here" line on your picture. It's confusing to explain what happens in milliseconds online, but you'll realize what I'm trying to explain when you race someone.
I haven't tuned that car yet sorry.No one is going to contest my Renault Gordini trap?
I figured you wouldn't quite get it, so I made this in paint because I'm entirely too bored. The scale isn't accurate.So even shells is measuring it wrong as he is a half car length behind ?
I haven't tuned that car yet sorry.
I figured you wouldn't quite get it, so I made this in paint because I'm entirely too bored. The scale isn't accurate.
I haven't tuned that car yet sorry.
A competition basically subtracts the cars' length from track length, since you start infront of yellow instead of behind it. Or to simplify it, the width of the shadow on the track. Maybe I'm overthinking this all, but everyone that I know or run compares trap speed when car is under the shadow. You can see when people hit their brakes, obviously.
I was being facetious.
This thread is practically pointless because different tunes run different traps and frankly if you are unsure if your tune is trapping high enough you're probably not a good tuner.
And you are all good tuners, so it seems the ONLY thing this thread could accomplish is start an argument like the one above.
I'd like to think this thread has created clarity as to the differences in where people measure their speeds at.
Decided to look more into Shells picture posted and I believe this confusion has all come about from where people are measuring speeds from. Numbers do climb pretty quick at the top like mikey mentioned. View attachment 170544
If you guys think trap should be taken at the first line of the shadow, then I will honestly admit all of my cars trap 1-2MPH lower than everyone else reports. That being said, they still run just as fast. I'll have to start tuning my cars to top out when the front bumper hits the shadow.I'd like to think this thread has created clarity as to the differences in where people measure their speeds at.
If you guys think trap should be taken at the first line of the shadow, then I will honestly admit all of my cars trap 1-2MPH lower than everyone else reports. That being said, they still run just as fast. I'll have to start tuning my cars to top out when the front bumper hits the shadow.
I always understood the front edge of the shadow is the finish line in a competition so that's where I gauge my traps at....when the bumper touches the shadow.
Trap speeds are basically just an indication of top end pull when comparing 2 of the same cars and doesn't always mean the one who traps higher will get there first.