- 23,800
- Philippines
Wrong again, as usual.
Following the Second World War, there were a few attempts at getting democracy to take hold in the Middle East, most notably in Iran. However, the newly-elected Prime Minister wanted to renegotiate the deal between Iran and the Anglo-Iranian Oil Corporation - now BP - to get a better deal for Iran. When AIOC refused, the Iranians attempted to nationalise the oil industry. Since this went against Western interests, cutting off a major supply of oil, the British and American governments orchestrated a coup in 1953, removing the democratically-elected government and replacing it with the Shah, who was much more willing to allow the AIOC to return under the same terms as they had originally operated under, and much more authoritarian. Meanwhile, Britain and America continued to promote democracy as the highest form of political thought. This was interpreted as "democracy is good, but only if it's on our terms", with the West happily betraying that if it was in their interests to do so.
So it wasn't a case of left-aligned governments chasing that warm and fuzzy feeling at all. Rather, it was right-aligned governments holding Middle Eastern nations to a different standard to that which they held themselves.
I'd suggest everyone study this and the history of Western intervention in developing regions and third-world countries.
It's not the "Give Peace a Chance" crowd that's created the current mess we're in. It's the corporate interest protections and Cold-war policies that have given power to the radical elements.
I don't have a link right now, but there's an excellent video online on how ISIS is recruiting the young and disenfranchised from the middle class both in the Middle East and Europe by presenting themselves as a better alternative to the current corrupt regimes (many of which are supported by the West), with very concrete goals and ideals.
This is very similar to the radicalization of the young in the 70's, when Communism promised a similar solution in many countries.
This all ties back to the way western elements have protected their interests by supporting dictators and fascists over the decades. It's easier to work out a mutually beneficial business deal with a dictator than a democratic government, which may or may not do what you want them to do. There's a good reason for the term "Banana Republic."
Over the last few decades, it has blown up in their faces... Iraq... Al Quaeda... ISIS... all linked to CIA interventionism in the Middle East in the past. And the rotten state of governance in the region simply provide more fuel to the fire.
There's no doubt ISIS is a threat now, and needs to be dealt with... but to paint it simply as a problem of religion is too pat. There are real and varied underlying social (and political) issues that need to be addressed in order to stamp out radicalism for good.