- 7,689
- Michigan
- Rallywgn81
Yeah... its that too...
That is pretty much how GM and the other American giants like Ford and Chrysler worked though the 1950's till about the mid 1980's. Almost every single car that was made by them was "rebadged" from another brand. But the different brand models usually had different front and rear end designs along with different trim, features, and engines.The Sprint/Caballero was sold in the American market alongside the El Camino, which was strange. Typical GM logic prevailed.
Except there really was no differences between the El Camino and Sprint/Caballero, unlike the examples you provided...That is pretty much how GM and the other American giants like Ford and Chrysler worked though the 1950's till about the mid 1980's. Almost every single car that was made by them was "rebadged" from another brand. But the different brand models usually had different front and rear end designs along with different trim, features, and engines.
Here are the "rebadged" GM full-size cars of 1960 (going from low end to top of the line):
Chevrolet Impala
Oldsmobile 98
Pontiac Bonneville
Buick LeSabre
Cadillac DeVille
The Daewoo G2X roadster was also a rebadge, this time the Saturn Sky.Um, a Daewoo badged Speedster.
So, much like the Isuzu Trooper further up the page (which proliferated around the world for the same reason), neither ugly, weird, silly or just plain stupid?To an American, the idea of a Daewoo-badged roadster might appear perplexing, but in actuality it isn't. It makes perfect sense to badge those two GM products as a Daewoo, a GM brand. Since Opel and Saturn have no brand presence in Korea, it's more logical to offer the Speedster and Sky as a Daewoo and sell it in Korea only rather then not offer it at all, especially since Daewoo's lineup lacked a sports car.
Some of them were more unusual than others (Honda, Subaru, HSV,).So, much like the Isuzu Trooper further up the page (which proliferated around the world for the same reason), neither ugly, weird, silly or just plain stupid?
What about it is? Toyota has a not insignificant stake in Subaru parent Fuji Heavy and the cars were developed together.I don't think it's ugly but it is weird and silly... GT86/BRZ/FR-S
1992-1995 GMC Chevette
This rebadge had nothing to do with the Chevrolet Chevette or even the Vauxhall Chevette; instead it was based off the Opel Kadett D. The GMC Chevette is the only vehicle branded as a GMC that is not a truck, crossover, or SUV, and it was sold only in Argentina. And that's not even the strangest part; the Kadett D's design had dated back to 1979 and ended production in 1984, therefore the GMC Chevette had a 13 year-old design when it hit the market.
What about it is?
I can appreciate that--particularly when there's a glaringly obvious connection between brands, such as Toyota and Scion, and to a lesser extent Subaru. I mean...I don't watch the modern auto industry like a hawk and I was still aware of their connection.Rebadging seems a bit weird and silly to me in every instance. Why do we need the same car with different badging? I'll give a little bit of a pass to luxury brands such as Acura/Infiniti/Lexus (for example the Honda NSX being rebadged an Acura for US sales). That strikes me more as just nation-specific marketing than rebadging. It's automatically weird to me that practically the same car is sold under two different names in the same market. And even weirder and sillier when it's 3.
Pyeonghwa Hwiparam
Kind of the same when VW of America called the Golf "Rabbit" in the 1970s:A small thing I found stupid, VW calling the Golf Mk.6 Wagon in the US a Jetta SportWagen. It never made sense to me with it well, looking like a Golf. To add on, I'm slightly annoyed that they just call the Golf GTI, just plain "GTI". It just sounds so basic, I prefer it when a manufacture actually treats it like a variant of a model.
^ At least in the case of the Toyota Matrix & Pontiac Vibe/Toyota Voltz, each of those cars are distinctive to one another. There weren't any shared parts on its rear-ends!What about it is? Toyota has a not insignificant stake in Subaru parent Fuji Heavy and the cars were developed together.
If anything, I wonder how long Toyota planned to axe the Scion brand...specifically if the decision had been made prior to the release of the FR-S in lieu of the 86 here.
Edit: Remember these?
Yeah, not so much badge engineering as platform sharing.-> ...
^ At least in the case of the Toyota Matrix & Pontiac Vibe/Toyota Voltz, each of those cars are distinctive to one another. There weren't any shared parts on its rear-ends!
Unlike the BRZ/Toyota GT86/86/Scion FR-S, the only things differ between the Subie & Toyota are:
1. Badges
2. Fender trim
3. Headlights
4. Front bumper facia
^ In short, the Toyota-GM NUMMI hatchback twins did a better job of separating the similarities of the two cars than Toyota-Subaru FA20 coupe.