Using AI to tune cars?

[GTSportster]

Has anyone tried to use AI to create a tuning app that can act as a crew chief, setting up the car perfectly with your given input? I saw a few GPT's on chatgpt but they aren't updated with the latest cars and I also don't know if they're that good. Maybe with the collective knowledge of GTPlanet this could be done, helping everyone equally.

 

[Abarth_71]

One of the members here has already created an app. https://gtprotune.com/

GT7 Tuning Calculator - Download v3.3 all new cars added!!

August 2024: GT Pro Tune is now live!! www.gtprotune.com May 2024 Edit: The app is nearing completion, if you sign up now you will receive a discount on the app when released. Back in March 2023 I have developed a tuning calculator for gt7, spring rate, dampers, gear ratios, dyno plotting and...

www.gtplanet.net

 

[GTSportster]

One of the members here has already created an app. https://gtprotune.com/

GT7 Tuning Calculator - Download v3.3 all new cars added!!

August 2024: GT Pro Tune is now live!! www.gtprotune.com May 2024 Edit: The app is nearing completion, if you sign up now you will receive a discount on the app when released. Back in March 2023 I have developed a tuning calculator for gt7, spring rate, dampers, gear ratios, dyno plotting and...

www.gtplanet.net

is this using AI in the backend or a data set of tunes for every car?

 

[Meythia]

AI

Why would you want to do that when there is a mathematically optimized calculation for it.

AI is wasteful, and its guesswork responses sometimes totally wrong until the training method is changed to fix some very specific responses.

Full AI - The End of Humanity?

It is right there: When comparing decimals On documentations, it is not decimals as in "parts of", but instead 2 whole numbers seperated by a dot for clarification of sections that belong together. I just tried the above: Hi human, I'm a GPT-4o mini powered AI chatbot. Ask me anything! ->...

www.gtplanet.net

You want to rely on that?
"Well, of course 100.1 HP is more than 100.9HP" - though that one error seems to have been corrected.