VW Golf TSI

  • Thread starter G.T
  • 33 comments
  • 1,300 views

G.T

11,462
United Kingdom
U.K
Paganisterr
Ak Paganister
Auto Express
Together with bumper-mounted machine guns and ejector seats, the idea of a supercharged and turbocharged engine sounds like something James Bond's 'Q' branch might dream up. However, from early next year, UK drivers will be able to buy a Volkswagen Golf GT equipped with just such a powerplant - and this is the first of a whole new range of 'super-turbo' VWs.

But why is the technology being applied to the mass market now? Well, with petrol prices and road tax on the rise, VW says sub-1.4-litre units are the future. The trouble is, as cars become heavier, you need more power, too.

The firm's innovative solution is the 1.4-litre TSI, which stands for turbocharged stratified injection. Based on the FSI petrol engine, the unit features a supercharger that operates up to around 2,000rpm, after which a turbocharger takes over. The result is 168bhp - about the same as the old 2.3-litre V5.

Installed in the new Golf GT, it gives 0-60mph in less than eight seconds, plus 39.2mpg economy and impressive CO2 emissions of 173g/km. But headline figures aside, the most striking aspect is the TSI's performance. Put simply, it feels like a large, lusty engine, with lots of punch and power right up to 6,500rpm.

Inside, the only clue to the new technology is a boost gauge, complementing the GT-spec sports seats and three-spoke steering wheel. Outside, there's a new GTI-style front grille, while lowered sports suspension and bigger brakes are the only other mechanical changes.

The result is a vehicle that rides and handles well. A Focus is sharper, but Ford doesn't yet have a 'super-turbo' engine. Not even James Bond has one of those.

1125412979_extras_noticia_1_0.jpg



Source link: http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/previews/59942/volkswagen_golf_gt_tsi.html

I think this is a very cleaver idea. It may not be a big difference in fuel economy and emissions, but it's a start. I like it.
 
They Turbocharger-Supercharger combo technology has been around for quite some time, I'm suprised it very rarely used.
 
Just sounds like more to go wrong to me. 168 bhp is pretty poor for a car turbocharged and supercharged, even for a 1.4.
 
I'd like 168 hp from a 1.4... but not with that much plumbing. Aside from the fuel benefits, I think the weight balance would just rock.

I'll reserve my "jumping for joy" for a time when you can get this on a cheaper car. Perhaps with a variable speed supercharger instead of a twin-charger?
 
120hp/litre isnt too bad for a production VW Golf in my opinion. The supercharger isnt designed for outright power, thats more of the turbochargers job.
 
I think that's pretty wicked. It's powerful and pretty damn economical too.

It's the perfect baby Gti, enough of a step down for it to be a viable alternative but also not so fast that it'll infringe on the Gti's market. If it handles like it should that will probably be one of the pick of the current hot hatches.
 
Lets hope they work hard on this technology and make it available trhoughout the VAG range with even the 3,2 litre engine getting a taste of this.
 
Young_Warrior
Lets hope they work hard on this technology and make it available trhoughout the VAG range with even the 3,2 litre engine getting a taste of this.

As long as they don't decide to put it in the forthcoming 'cheap' RWD Gallardo!
 
They won't sell it the States because no body bys car in the States with that small of an engine. However if they did I wouldn't buying one.
 
TheCracker
As long as they don't decide to put it in the forthcoming 'cheap' RWD Gallardo!

A cheap RWD gallardo? How much got any more info? I would only expect to see this technology in luxury cars ot hatches and hot saloons.
 
Young_Warrior
A cheap RWD gallardo? How much got any more info? I would only expect to see this technology in luxury cars ot hatches and hot saloons.

Lambo are about to release a 'entry level' Gallardo with the V8 from the Audi RS6, its probably going to be RWD to keep cost and weight down.
 
BlazinXtreme
They won't sell it the States because no body bys car in the States with that small of an engine. However if they did I wouldn't buying one.

So, you don't want to buy one but they aren't selling it anyway so you can't 👍

It's a good idea imo. Yes the idea of a dual charged car has been around for a while, even in this mixed form, but it's nice to see a company like VW working with it in mass production.

At around 170bhp from a 1.4 i'm hoping they be selling at no more than £14,000, that's a nice, fast, cheap and insurable car.
 
So, you don't want to buy one but they aren't selling it anyway so you can't

Cool idea, but I think I'd rather just have a 1.8T in something.
 
I'd personally like a 1.4 or a 1.5 with that much power and an ultralight. "Hot hatches" are just getting too big, heavy and powerful, in my opinion. I've never had as much fun driving a powerful car as I've had in lightweight (sub 900kg - 1000kg) ones with decent wheelbases.

Big engines are much better for highway cruising, but where's the fun in that?
 
Funny thing: the 2.0 TDI engine also has 170 hp, but puts out 250 ft-lbs of torque at 1750 rpm. The 1.4 has only 177 ft-lbs torque.

And the punchline: the TDI gets 48 MPG. Smaller engines do not necessarily mean better economy, especially when paired with the increased fuel demands of forced induction. Look at the S2000 or RX8.
 
Div is back
TDI a 170 hp, I doubt that...My dad has a Passat TDI 2005 and it has NOT 170 hp, it's very torquey though.
This is where I got my info: http://www.vwvortex.com/artman/publish/volkswagen_news/article_1496.shtml
As well as the 1.4 l Twincharger with 125 kW / 170 HP described in detail above, Volkswagen is also launching the Golf GT with the most powerful diesel engine on the market and the most powerful that has ever been available ex-works in a Golf: the 2.0 TDI with 125 kW / 170 HP: The exceedingly frugal Golf GT 2.0 TDI is exciting to drive because it offers impressive power reserves in all situations. The direct-injection pump/nozzle turbo diesel with piezoelectric elements, four-valve technology, two overhead camshafts and a diesel particulate filter as standard develops 125 kW / 170 PS at 4000 rpm. Its torque curve reaches an imposing maximum of 350 newton metres on a plateau of 1800 to 2500 rpm. The performance figures for this, the most powerful Golf TDI ever, are convincing across the board: It achieves a maximum speed of 220 km/h (136 mph) and accelerates from stationary to 100 km/h (62 mph) in only 8.2 seconds; and all this with a consumption of only 5.9 l/100 km (47.9 mpg) diesel.


Young_Warrior
s2000 aint forced induced and neither is the rx8
Sorry, my post was vauge. I was usign them as examples of small-displacement engines wiht poor economy. The bit about forced induction was an unrelated comment.
 
Yeah I understand that... But I was saying a supercharger OR a turbo charger alone produce over 178hp.
 

Latest Posts

Back