But does 40 MPG sound poor as well? Bless it's heart, I bet it runs on regular as well.TheCrackerJust sounds like more to go wrong to me. 168 bhp is pretty poor for a car turbocharged and supercharged, even for a 1.4.
There is a very good reason for that. It's called "the TDI is a diesel". Therefore, being a deisel, it is automatically not as much fun, doesn't rev as high and genreally less of a drivers car, even if it is faster.skip0110Funny thing: the 2.0 TDI engine also has 170 hp, but puts out 250 ft-lbs of torque at 1750 rpm. The 1.4 has only 177 ft-lbs torque.
And the punchline: the TDI gets 48 MPG. Smaller engines do not necessarily mean better economy, especially when paired with the increased fuel demands of forced induction. Look at the S2000 or RX8.