What defines you as a good driver?

What defines you as a good driver?


  • Total voters
    115
For me, I have aims in the game at which point I would be able to confidently call myself a "Good driver", all aspects considered:

1) To regularly be able to lap within 1 second of the fastest time at any track/combo
2) To be able to do 10+ lap races without errors at my best pace
3) To be able to consistently hit my braking points and racing lines lap after lap
4) To reach my limit a great deal faster than I currently do

All the best
Maz
 
“What defines you as a good driver”? Is this in everybody else’s eyes or for just you? I have a G25 wheel and there are so many ways to make your self faster in the way you setup your configuration. I personally drive without active steering because if you have this on it automatically sorts out the over steer for you and again if you have the active stability control on once again this helps you have more traction. So I’m not fast but I drive with all the aids off, which I get great satisfaction.

And I know if I put all these other settings on I’ll be two seconds faster. So what makes you a good driver is a great question.
 
I would say a good driver is one that can drive fast and clean under racing conditions, especially under pressure, and hold it well.
 
Agreed. Almost anyone can lay down that perfect lap when hey have the track all to themselves. BUT, kudos go out to the drivers that can take that time attack car and run fender to fender and win races with it.

I find satisfaction in taking a car that is not as fast as everyone else, the "underdog", and winning races with it.👍

Edit: which helps prove what kind of driver you really are.

i love goin to daytona and changing cars every race... to show everyone that it don't matter what car i'm in and i can still place high.
 
since the choices are limited, I chose Time Trial.
Because if your faster around a track by yourself, regardless of your ability to race side-by-side, sooner or later you'll get around somebody slower.
Both are valuable, but if you're great at racing around/with traffic, it will only keep you up front for so long.

“What defines you as a good driver”? Is this in everybody else’s eyes or for just you? I have a G25 wheel and there are so many ways to make your self faster in the way you setup your configuration. I personally drive without active steering because if you have this on it automatically sorts out the over steer for you and again if you have the active stability control on once again this helps you have more traction. So I’m not fast but I drive with all the aids off, which I get great satisfaction.

And I know if I put all these other settings on I’ll be two seconds faster. So what makes you a good driver is a great question.
You're Div 1. and you think you're not fast? And unless I missed a dramatic change in GT5P, since when does ASC give you more traction? Doesn't it just make it easier to drive, but slightly slower lap times?

I value consistently fast laps over one lap that you have .1% of repeating.
In the WRS, (my first week), Week 34, I started out running a 1:05.8xx. That was my initial best lap. Then I got a 1:04.687, and then a 1:03.483. Than another 1:03.483, and then a 1:03.453.
1:03.453 ended up being my fastest lap, however, as you can see, I ran 3 laps within .030 of each other, and I can now run consistently in the high 1:03's.
Holl01 won with a 1:01.8xx. Now, if he sucks at racing with other cars, do you really think he'd never get around me and subsequently blow my doors off?
 
Last edited:
since the choices are limited, I chose Time Trial.
Because if your faster around a track by yourself, regardless of your ability to race side-by-side, sooner or later you'll get around somebody slower.
Both are valuable, but if you're great at racing around/with traffic, it will only keep you up front for so long.

Holl01 won with a 1:01.8xx. Now, if he sucks at racing with other cars, do you really think he'd never get around me and subsequently blow my doors off?

I think since you've cited the example of Holl01, it can provide a slightly different side to this conversation in addition to what you have already said.

With my WRS runs, I tend to do many laps in the same bracket for an extended period of time, then maybe eventually the lap I want will come together. That could be just a marked improvement in a particular sector, it could be all 3 personal bests in T1, T2 and T3 coming together to give me my best theoretical lap or maybe just reacting to a better ghost in front of me and finding time that way. WRS 32 was a fine example of this, for days I was running low 1'43s and in a race that was my best also, then in the free run finally a 1'42 came up and I submitted with that.

We don't really know for sure how much time Holl01 spends on the time trials, but people like him and Madison have got to the stage where their limits are reached a great deal faster than mine. Sometimes Holland submits in the first day, sometimes if he has to compete with Timppaq he has to run all week to find that special laptime and may still not beat Timo.

In a race situation, holl01 has been beaten very recently in RoC by GTP_PASM (Division 2) and also in Event03 by GTP_Stotty (Div 1 silver) because PASM and Stotty have a long history of racing as opposed to dedicating their priorities to time trialling. PASM and Stotty were able to win by being consistently fast whereas holl01 made mistakes in the races and cost himself time, usually a result of less race practise and trying to do perfect laps every lap of a race...like an extended time trial. Also it should be noted that the races were close, it wasn't the case that when holl01 was running good laps he was many tenths faster than those opponents.

I think this shows that a healthy mix of both racecraft and pure TT speed is required to truly flourish on the track. Don't by any means assume that because someone trumps you week after week in WRS that they will eventually find a way around you in a race.

I personally was struggling a great deal in WRS when I first started as D2 bronze, hardly threatening the mid-pack D2 guys at all, but I won my class in Event 02 because I was a much more frequent racer at the time and far better at that. I also was runner up in the GTP Sixaxis championship, losing 2-1 in a very very close battle with GTP_timeattack who is Division 1 gold based on his time trial performance in the GTP qualifier. I guess what I'm trying to convey is that time trial specialists may not have the racecraft and consistency in a race situation to find their way around someone who is of a lower division or subdivision based solely on WRS and TT results.

All the best
Maz
 
In theory, racing should be a better guide to a drivers abilities as to be good requires a broader set of skills than time trialing... you have to be both quick and consistent and also be able to make the right decisions at the right time, often in a spilt second. Plus you don't have the option of re-starting if you get a lap wrong.

However, the stupidly strong draft in GT5P compensates for massive differences in absolute ability... it enables one driver to keep up with someone much, much faster, and even beat them if they time their overtake right.

At Suzuka, it's not so much the effect of the draft on the 2 long straights, but more the way there's still a very strong draft between say Dunlop and Degner, or Degner and the Hairpin.... preventing a faster driver from breaking free. Fuji is just a joke for racing as one driver could be as much 2 seconds a lap faster in free run but still not be able to break away... this is just not realistic in any way shape of form.

For me, Time Trialing will remain a much better guide of someone's absolute driving ability until the draft effect is made more realistic.
 
I think since you've cited the example of Holl01, it can provide a slightly different side to this conversation in addition to what you have already said.

With my WRS runs, I tend to do many laps in the same bracket for an extended period of time, then maybe eventually the lap I want will come together. That could be just a marked improvement in a particular sector, it could be all 3 personal bests in T1, T2 and T3 coming together to give me my best theoretical lap or maybe just reacting to a better ghost in front of me and finding time that way. WRS 32 was a fine example of this, for days I was running low 1'43s and in a race that was my best also, then in the free run finally a 1'42 came up and I submitted with that.

We don't really know for sure how much time Holl01 spends on the time trials, but people like him and Madison have got to the stage where their limits are reached a great deal faster than mine. Sometimes Holland submits in the first day, sometimes if he has to compete with Timppaq he has to run all week to find that special laptime and may still not beat Timo.

In a race situation, holl01 has been beaten very recently in RoC by GTP_PASM (Division 2) and also in Event03 by GTP_Stotty (Div 1 silver) because PASM and Stotty have a long history of racing as opposed to dedicating their priorities to time trialling. PASM and Stotty were able to win by being consistently fast whereas holl01 made mistakes in the races and cost himself time, usually a result of less race practise and trying to do perfect laps every lap of a race...like an extended time trial. Also it should be noted that the races were close, it wasn't the case that when holl01 was running good laps he was many tenths faster than those opponents.

I think this shows that a healthy mix of both racecraft and pure TT speed is required to truly flourish on the track. Don't by any means assume that because someone trumps you week after week in WRS that they will eventually find a way around you in a race.

I personally was struggling a great deal in WRS when I first started as D2 bronze, hardly threatening the mid-pack D2 guys at all, but I won my class in Event 02 because I was a much more frequent racer at the time and far better at that. I also was runner up in the GTP Sixaxis championship, losing 2-1 in a very very close battle with GTP_timeattack who is Division 1 gold based on his time trial performance in the GTP qualifier. I guess what I'm trying to convey is that time trial specialists may not have the racecraft and consistency in a race situation to find their way around someone who is of a lower division or subdivision based solely on WRS and TT results.

All the best
Maz
Very interesting, I did not know those things.
Although I will say, I would believe that to be the status quo of what's commonly called "choking". Not that I'm saying Holl01 choked, but rather, he was so desperate to not lose, and/or to impatient to wait for the right moments, that he went overboard.
I've seen the penalties of being impatient myself, causing screw-ups in my first 50+ online races. I've since learned that it's better to wait, and finish 3rd than go "balls to the wall" for 10 laps, which usually results in 2-3 screw-ups.
I guess that's why real-life drivers don't always push the limit quite like they can to.
I would say actual races define you as a better driver, and even go so far as to say hot laps mean squat, but only once we can actually choose races, and set them up ourselves. Like a 40 lap race around Fuji, or something longer than 10 laps, with the potential to qualify or choose starting grid order.

What would make races be the ultimate test, would be actual qualifying, wherein if you crash, it's back of the pack, in a "backup car" (no settings). And also the damage we expect from GT5, that should knock you out of the race, or at least contention.

For me, Time Trialing will remain a much better guide of someone's absolute driving ability until the draft effect is made more realistic.
Agreed. The "drafting" is crazy. I've found that since at least GT3, if you're within 1.5 seconds, you're in the draft. And if you're in it, it doesn't take long to close that gap, and start picking up tremendously unrealistic amounts of extra speed.
 
Very interesting, I did not know those things.
Although I will say, I would believe that to be the status quo of what's commonly called "choking". Not that I'm saying Holl01 choked, but rather, he was so desperate to not lose, and/or to impatient to wait for the right moments, that he went overboard.
I've seen the penalties of being impatient myself, causing screw-ups in my first 50+ online races. I've since learned that it's better to wait, and finish 3rd than go "balls to the wall" for 10 laps, which usually results in 2-3 screw-ups.

Exactly, and that's where the racing experience comes in, the ability to handle pressure on a regular basis and reduce the occurences of choking as you put it. Clearly being a Division 1 gold driver also comes with its own baggage, you have a standard to maintain and you're up there for everyone to take shots at :)

There have been occasions where I (and of course many more experienced and talented racers) have actually been able to complete 10 "balls to the wall" laps without mistakes resulting in the most memorable races we go on about for months afterwards. My friends know the ones I mean because I never shut up about the one or two I've managed in 12 months :lol:

All the best
Maz
 
Just regarding my race with Dan (Holl01)...

I don't think he 'choked', but I do think he'd had very little practice time compared to me and I think this showed. I'd been running lots of races with fast guys and had the car 'dialed in'... meaning that I had a tune I was really comfortable with and I could run consistently fast (mid 56's) every lap.

In our race I made no mistakes and Dan made only 1 small mistake on lap 8, but this was coming out of the hairpin, and it enabled me to break the draft. After this the gap remained pretty much constant.

I don't think this shows I'm a faster driver than Dan, just that on the day I was a bit better prepared.

Edit for spelling
 
Last edited:
Exactly, and that's where the racing experience comes in, the ability to handle pressure on a regular basis and reduce the occurences of choking as you put it. Clearly being a Division 1 gold driver also comes with its own baggage, you have a standard to maintain and you're up there for everyone to take shots at :)

Stotty
Just regarding my race with Dan (Holl01)...

I don't think he 'choked', but I do think he'd had very little practice time compared to me and I think this showed. I'd been running lots of races with fast guys and had the car 'dialed in'... meaning that I had a tune I was really comfortable with and I could run consistently fast (mid 56's) every lap.

And this is why I specifically said
Not that I'm saying Holl01 choked, but rather, he was so desperate to not lose, and/or to impatient to wait for the right moments, that he went overboard.
I made this mention in an attempt to ward off the evil spirits of flaming that may come from others, so please don't make it sound like I've said he choked guys, Cause Lord knows someone will come in here, without reading my post, and determine me an evil, unskilled, terrible, horrible person.
 
And this is why I specifically said
I made this mention in an attempt to ward off the evil spirits of flaming that may come from others, so please don't make it sound like I've said he choked guys, Cause Lord knows someone will come in here, without reading my post, and determine me an evil, unskilled, terrible, horrible person.

:lol:
 
I agree in most things said. However I want to make a couple comments on subjects thats not brought to the tabel. First: I find drivers who master different racelines to usually be the best ones. While in a race sometimes you are forced out of you ideal line. In situations like this its all about car controll. Great drivers got great car controll. Second, and maybe out of topic: I resently been thinking about how GT5p for me in manny ways is a tuning chamionship. Not saying this is good or bad but it is a major factor in making good speed.
 
I resently been thinking about how GT5p for me in manny ways is a tuning chamionship. Not saying this is good or bad but it is a major factor in making good speed.

I hope it stays that way for GT5, its nice having an extra factor in the racing and it forces people to learn about tuning their car if they want to be competitive - something that you didn't really have to do in previous GT's.
 
Id say a good driver is someone who possesses the best of both types of racing... a mixture of TT speed with racing common sense would make the ultimate driver.. I myself absolutely SUCK at TTing... I just get bored after 10 laps and quit or I never get quicker or shave time off... Racing online on the other hand, im a lot better at... also when Im racing and someone is in front of me it gives me that extra motivation to push just that little bit harder to try and catch up and give that driver some competition.. I also pride myself on giving enough room when entering corners together and always try to be aware of who's where to antcipate... anticipation is the key IMO when you follow someone closely... braking a little earlier to avoid slamming the driver in front and stuff like that ..
 
A good driver in my opinion is one that can put in very similar lap times constantly. You don't have to be the fastest to win, if you keep your lap times consistent and someone is lets say 0.2 quicker per lap, they will pull away gradually but if they rarely hit a good lap they may gain time on one lap and then lose that and more the next lap with an error. So consistency builds pressure on another driver and as they know they can't afford one slip they are more likely to make the mistake.

Obviously TT's are about all out pace and hotlapping is a good measure of a driver but i feel racing is more demanding and thats where the best stand out. Theres so much more to racing, overtaking, defending, consistency and the ability to handle pressure.

Personally i never consider myself very quick but i always try to make sure all my race laps are within 0.2-0.3 of a second and i get very annoyed when i make a silly error. Strangely i feel more comfortable while leading as i can dictate the race and its up to others to catch and pass me.
 
I don't know if anyone has done this poll before, but i'm going to do it anyway. So like the title says, what makes you a good driver? Racing on-line, or having top times in the rankings. This will just be a straight up answer. If you look at the poll, please vote, even if you don't feel like posting. Every vote counts!

One could make a good arguement for both answers. A pilot could be racing the clock by trying to get faster and faster lap speeds (lower lap times).

Racing in 'traffic' is something completely different that requires additional skills. imho, ymmv

I have seen many many pilots who can run fast laps without problems, but once they are in race traffic they stink!! conversely, some pilots actually do better with competitors on the track at teh same time.
 
Back