What do you think...
- Thread starter Acid X
- 11 comments
- 496 views
I grew up seeing loads of mid-70's Firebirds, Trans Am's, Camaro's...all great stuff. To me, the Firebird is one of the quintessential muscle cars (with the Shelby Mustang's being more of a pony car, if you will). Power with blatant sex appeal...if a dated appeal at that.
There's better muscle cars out there, but not many.
There's better muscle cars out there, but not many.
- 747
77 bandit with the 6.6L olds 
I'm not a big muscle car fan, but I almost went with one of those, rather than another MX3, the last time I had to part with one of my MX's.
I'm not a big muscle car fan, but I almost went with one of those, rather than another MX3, the last time I had to part with one of my MX's.
- 10,081
- WFG9
Trans Ams, Firebirds were some of the creams of the Automtive crop in the US as far as styling goes. While some may not have cared for the endura bumper, compared to the fully exposed and grinning grills of some of the other cars, it was, in my opinion, very appealing.
Years I like are 67-69, 70-73, 77-78, 82-90, 91-92, 98-02.
74-76, 79-81, 93-97 are the low points in styling.
Years I like are 67-69, 70-73, 77-78, 82-90, 91-92, 98-02.
74-76, 79-81, 93-97 are the low points in styling.
- 747
Good years Talentless. I definetely like more than just the 77 bandit, I just am partial to that one 
- 10,081
- WFG9
I'm partial to the early third gens, prior to the fog lights in the front corners. basically, the one kitt was based on.
- 747
technically, there's no such thing as a 79 bandit 
but cool do you know if it had the big olds. engine under the hood?
but cool do you know if it had the big olds. engine under the hood?
