In Bruges
Watched this a few nights ago having missed it at the cinema (it got a short theatre release in the UK) and have to say it's a damn good film.
I got it the other day and was scanning through it... got a really good laugh at the scene in the restaurant, with the American guy.
Lolita (1962) -- A middle-aged college professor becomes infatuated with a 14-year-old nymphet... doesn't sound like that much of a risquè plot. Then again, go back and see the year it was released. I heard that when the movie was released, they had to say the girl was 18 years old so they could pass censors... she was 16; however, in the book she was supposed to be 12, and in the movie they made her 14... kinda complicated, but when you think of the censors in the 1950s and 60s, it all makes sense. Also, a lot of the stronger scenes are left to the viewer's imagination, so as not to upset the censors.
I wasn't sure what to expect before watching this. The oldest Kubrick film I'd seen was
A Clockwork Orange, and this one is nothing similar. Still, the movie is very funny, very obscure and everything in between. Peter Sellers is funny as hell in it too. 8/10
The Boston Strangler (1968) -- Based on the real Boston Strangler, who terrorised said city in 1963, serial killer Albert Desalvo... The movie itself is pretty good, though it has a made-for-tv aura in it. The editing is top-notch and I was reminded of the beginning of
Grand Prix, with all the different angles coming to place in the same shot. Despite including a Hollywood Fantasy element to it (they picture Desalvo as being a schizophrenic, which he was not), though he
was in a mental institution. The movie is kinda slow at times, especially what seems to be the first hour, and in reality is the first 25 minutes. Tony Curtis was great in it, as was George Kennedy. Very underrated film, though it's not a masterpiece either. 7/10