Who says the Honda Z act is ****

  • Thread starter SAAB99
  • 48 comments
  • 4,397 views
And people ask me why I drink....

...if you ask anyone in the know, they will tell you that it's not drifting. Too many people think that drifting is simply going sideways. Well, I can walk at an angle around corners but I'm not drifting, I'm not even RWD. Any car can go sideways for a little bit with a touch of the handbrake but only a car with drive at the rear can push sideways into, and keep a drift...

FF = going sideways for a bit.
RWD = can keep pushing sideways.
That's the way I see it... so no, not drifting.
 
20416410020_large.jpg


I dont know why I fill I have to prove to you people thats my car but in this picture You can see my dads old coupe covered up.

Here is a link to his car that says my name Ace.

http://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/showthread.php?t=639750




Ok, I really dont care what you think, Over here the cars are rare, and they are smaller then the original Mini Cooper with a 600cc motorcycle engine in it and they are one of the first Honda's to be brought over to the U.S. Thats why its unique



I have two words for you my leprechaun friend... potato famine. Scares ya huh?

Three words: Learn to respect.
 
Drop it.

Continually mentioning the matter is only likely to spark more nonsense for the parties involved. Let it die, and the thread can resume as normal.
 
How come the Drift King approves it?? Plus there's more challenge FF when tuning for drifting, no 🤬 FR is different sherlock, don't need much but look at FF, LOT of tuning to do. Seems your also saying those things because your one of those VTEC hater kids too(according to that HOMO thing of yours). Just because your a Nissan lover doesn't mean you can smash & start saying stuff about people drifting FF because it's a Honda.

Sorry man, didn't mean to offend you or anything thing. BTW, I don't HATE Honda, most of my boys drive Civics and Integras and they're cool, they just have to do a lot more work and a lot more money into what my Maxima does. You seem to think that I stated my opinion due to the fact that it's a Honda in the vid but in actuality it's not, its the fact that its FF drifting. I have nothing against FF cars, I drive one and have been driving them for the past 10 years or so. Would I drift with it, no.

With all that said, I don't hate any car. I find that every car has its own time and place. I wouldn't take my car to a drag race because its heavy but I would take it for a longer run. It would be the opposite for small Honda's (Civics etc.).
 
Because I have this car on cardomain and it has had 15 thousand hits. You dont believe me I will post picture of this car that know one has. Type in az600 under google its on the first page my user name is 70superbee, there is a page for my 70 superbee and a 70 dodge dart. I bet it says my name Ace somewhere on it.

Ok. :)
 
I have alot of FR car's I just get board doing the same thing over and over. This is just something else to do.

I dont get why this bothers people. I do it because I had one of these cars and games are ment for you to do things you wouldn't do in real life. I'm not going to play GTA and go out steal a plane and kill a hooker.

20416410014_large.jpg



Here is a picture of my car.

Don´t worry man. I wasn´t acting seriously. I respect more FF fishtailing than AWD 10-90 acting like if it would be FR, because you´re assuming your situation honestly, at least.
 
I have alot of FR car's I just get board doing the same thing over and over. This is just something else to do.

I dont get why this bothers people. I do it because I had one of these cars and games are ment for you to do things you wouldn't do in real life. I'm not going to play GTA and go out steal a plane and kill a hooker.

20416410014_large.jpg



Here is a picture of my car.

Considering that's legit, you have a really cool car, despite what haters say. 👍
 
Considering that's legit, you have a really cool car, despite what haters say. 👍

I followed this thread from the beginning and no one hated on the car, they hated on the fact of seeing it drift. I said the car was cool but drifting it, that a different story.
 
To be honest. When the drift trial was on japanese cars befor 1979. Did you see the learderboard . A ff car was on top of all rwd cars. I saved the replay on my ps3
 
I've been observing this "debate" for the last few days, and thought I'd throw in my 2 cents. Before I do though, I'll clarify a few things about myself. In GT5, I drift RWD cars, as that is what I find most enjoyable. In real life, I don't drift anything on any kind of regular basis, but I am a fan of all things motorsport. F1, endurance, drag, drift, boats bikes and snowmobiles...hell, even lawnmowers, if it's got a motor and can be raced, I'm a fan. I can even manage to appreciate and find beauty in NASCAR :odd:

After having spent the last 3-4 months frequenting this board, I am absolutely flabbergasted at all the hate focused around the drive-train of a drift car. It makes absolutely no sense to me.

I think many people forget just how small-time drifting still is in the global motorsport community. Yes, it's been legit in Japan for a while now, but everywhere else in the world, it is a very small blip on the radar. It's only been in the last 5 years or so that drifting has really started to make much noise in both North American and Europe. All over the world, the drift community is still working hard to be considered legit by most other forms of motorsport, much in the same way that import drag racing fought a huge uphill battle in North America before people accepted it...and what do we do? Instead of uniting together, we fight amongst ourselves.

And at the end of the day, what is everyone actually fighting about? They're fighting about the definition and use of the word "drift". For some reason, probably because it is the godfather of drifting, the RWD drift community has made an attempt to lay claim to the word drift. Anything that is not RWD is not drifting. Who the hell is anyone to try to claim a word? Grow up. I've drifted a snowmobile on a frozen lake before...anyone care to try and tell me what I was doing wasn't drifting?

To me, the whole idea of saying "FF and AWD drifting is not drifting, RWD is the only acceptable form of drifting" is as ridiculous as saying "softball is not baseball, hardball is the only real baseball". Of course there are difference, and of course they are not compatible with each other, but that doesn't mean that they aren't part of the same family.

After observing this drive-train debate for a while, I've noticed a very amusing trend. It's not an absolute, but more often than not, the people who seem to have a problem with non RWD drifting are from the Americas, Europe and Australia, whilst the people who seem to be most open minded and encouraging towards FF and AWD drifting are Japanese. I don't think it is possible to credit any one person with "inventing" drifting, but I think most will agree that it was the Japanese who pioneered the idea of "drifting culture". I just think it's funny that all these cultures who are sort of the "new kids on the block" in the drifting world are the ones who are getting the most bent out of shape, while the people who have been doing the drift thing the longest are the most accepting of new and different aspects of drifting. As someone already said, if FF and AWD are not drifting, then why does Keiichi San himself accept it?

I also find it amusing that most people who actually drift for real are the more accepting, or at least tolerant, of other forms of drifting, and people who only drift in a video game (like me) are the most biased...I guess it's actually quite common for the armchair quarterbacks to be the most biased and opinionated.

Personally, I give props to anyone who drifts anything.

@OP: I really didn't think much of the Act Z in GT5, but after seeing those pics of your real car, I have a new appreciation for it. It's a very unique looking car, beautiful in its own way. Congrats on owning a pretty rare piece of extremely under appreciated automotive history.

If I can offer a little advice though, next time, try to take the high road and avoid insulting people's cultural background. We're a global community here, and that kind of stuff is really not appreciated.


Not even smoke :yuck:

Are you talking just the civic, or both pics? If you're talking about just the civic, I have to point out the obvious...the 86 isn't making any smoke either...


To be honest. When the drift trial was on japanese cars befor 1979. Did you see the learderboard . A ff car was on top of all rwd cars. I saved the replay on my ps3

Since we're sort of discussing what is and what isn't drifting, I think it may be best to leave the GT5 drift trials out of the discussion, as we all know how poor they are.
 
I've been observing this "debate" for the last few days, and thought I'd throw in my 2 cents. Before I do though, I'll clarify a few things about myself. In GT5, I drift RWD cars, as that is what I find most enjoyable. In real life, I don't drift anything on any kind of regular basis, but I am a fan of all things motorsport. F1, endurance, drag, drift, boats bikes and snowmobiles...hell, even lawnmowers, if it's got a motor and can be raced, I'm a fan. I can even manage to appreciate and find beauty in NASCAR :odd:

After having spent the last 3-4 months frequenting this board, I am absolutely flabbergasted at all the hate focused around the drive-train of a drift car. It makes absolutely no sense to me.

I think many people forget just how small-time drifting still is in the global motorsport community. Yes, it's been legit in Japan for a while now, but everywhere else in the world, it is a very small blip on the radar. It's only been in the last 5 years or so that drifting has really started to make much noise in both North American and Europe. All over the world, the drift community is still working hard to be considered legit by most other forms of motorsport, much in the same way that import drag racing fought a huge uphill battle in North America before people accepted it...and what do we do? Instead of uniting together, we fight amongst ourselves.

And at the end of the day, what is everyone actually fighting about? They're fighting about the definition and use of the word "drift". For some reason, probably because it is the godfather of drifting, the RWD drift community has made an attempt to lay claim to the word drift. Anything that is not RWD is not drifting. Who the hell is anyone to try to claim a word? Grow up. I've drifted a snowmobile on a frozen lake before...anyone care to try and tell me what I was doing wasn't drifting?

To me, the whole idea of saying "FF and AWD drifting is not drifting, RWD is the only acceptable form of drifting" is as ridiculous as saying "softball is not baseball, hardball is the only real baseball". Of course there are difference, and of course they are not compatible with each other, but that doesn't mean that they aren't part of the same family.

After observing this drive-train debate for a while, I've noticed a very amusing trend. It's not an absolute, but more often than not, the people who seem to have a problem with non RWD drifting are from the Americas, Europe and Australia, whilst the people who seem to be most open minded and encouraging towards FF and AWD drifting are Japanese. I don't think it is possible to credit any one person with "inventing" drifting, but I think most will agree that it was the Japanese who pioneered the idea of "drifting culture". I just think it's funny that all these cultures who are sort of the "new kids on the block" in the drifting world are the ones who are getting the most bent out of shape, while the people who have been doing the drift thing the longest are the most accepting of new and different aspects of drifting. As someone already said, if FF and AWD are not drifting, then why does Keiichi San himself accept it?

I also find it amusing that most people who actually drift for real are the more accepting, or at least tolerant, of other forms of drifting, and people who only drift in a video game (like me) are the most biased...I guess it's actually quite common for the armchair quarterbacks to be the most biased and opinionated.

Personally, I give props to anyone who drifts anything.

@OP: I really didn't think much of the Act Z in GT5, but after seeing those pics of your real car, I have a new appreciation for it. It's a very unique looking car, beautiful in its own way. Congrats on owning a pretty rare piece of extremely under appreciated automotive history.

If I can offer a little advice though, next time, try to take the high road and avoid insulting people's cultural background. We're a global community here, and that kind of stuff is really not appreciated.




Are you talking just the civic, or both pics? If you're talking about just the civic, I have to point out the obvious...the 86 isn't making any smoke either...




Since we're sort of discussing what is and what isn't drifting, I think it may be best to leave the GT5 drift trials out of the discussion, as we all know how poor they are.

First I'd like to say, very well written piece of work. I wish more people could state their opinion this way rather than bashing and insulting. Good work.

Next, I don't think the debates are about anyone "claiming" the word drift. Many people on here that drift online drives with other drivers. Drifters in the real word that do their thing are solo and sometimes with drivers of the same drive train. Here is where I see the problem comes from, most people here that just start out jump into a AWD car and try to "rip" the tracks up. Meanwhile you have a group of RWD drifters in a line taking more precision and technique. All of a sudden, that guy in the AWD comes around the corner full speed and bam, hits the guy at the back of the tandem and ruins a perfect line. That's the problem, AWD drifters online are careless and lack control (as in the real world). They rely too much on the front tires to get them out of situations and encourages laziness.

With all that said, most of this comes from online. You got a lot of "noobs" smashing and bashing everyone with lack of control, they're the ones giving AWD drifting a bad name.

A side note, I want to see an AWD or FF keep up with a RWD car in a tandem, with angle and control not just sliding by.
 
I completely agree that the reason most people dislike FF and AWD because of bad experiences in the open lobby. I probably would put myself in that category.

When I host lobbies, I lock the drive-train selection to RWD only, because I want to avoid the headache that comes with having different drive-trains in the same lobby. In my experience (and I think this is pretty obvious to most), FF and AWD are not compatible for doing tandems with RWD cars. The lines, angles, and speed are all different. But basically, I don't allow FF and AWD for the same reason I don't allow X1...it just doesn't fit with the theme of the room (the theme being tandems/trains).

I also agree that AWD is easier to control, in terms of not spinning out. In GT5, this can sometimes attract a younger driver (also, many kids under the age of about 15 are not really familiar with the legendary status of the RWD drift icons like s-chassis, FC, FD, 1JZ and 2JZ 'yotas, etc....but they are familiar with Sti, Evo, GT-R, cause that's what popular right now), which is usually the source of the whole "the AWD guy ruined the train". But to me, bad driving is bad driving, and is the fault of the driver, not the drive-train.

All that said, just because FF and AWD can't tandem well with RWD, that doesn't mean they aren't various forms of drifting...to me at least.
 

Latest Posts

Back