Why do people still like and follow F1 so much?

  • Thread starter Earth
  • 138 comments
  • 9,522 views
I'm honestly watch F1 only because Kimi is driving. I didn't actually watch those years when he wasn't. But back in the days of Schumacher and Häkkinen I was more fond of formula one.

Another thing here in Finland that reduced my interesting in formula race was the change of the broadcast to a paid channel and the commentators are really bad and boring. There are 2 mins silent caps between commentary and almost everything the speak of is either already "too late" or wrong.

I've have watched last two season some Sky sports Live streams that I can find. They are much better.
 
I have been absent from the Motorsports forum for some time. I am not really a Formula 1 fan, but I think people follow this category because these are the most sophisticated racing machines with some of the greatest racing talent on some of the most intense racing courses on Earth. I think that is what draws F1 to be the spectacle that it is. There is also the challenge of building your own cars within the given regulations. Even that adds to the challenge. You can't deny the appeal and the challenge this series provides, drama and politics aside.

Again- I don't follow F1 as religiously as others do, but I have immense respect for Formula 1. That's just the way I see things.
 
The difference is though that the Olympics is about finding the best athlete. F1 finds the best athlete/car/team combination. The Olympics goes to some lengths to standardise equipment and make sure that no competitor has an unfair advantage.

If F1 was in spec cars then perhaps it would be similar, but I doubt Vettel would still be world champion if he was stuck in a Caterham for a season.

Think of it as a cybergame. Athletes are only part of the puzzle... the equipment is the other. Formula One racers are effectively cyborgs, with cars custom-tailored to fit them and work with them (Especially true with larger drivers like Kubica and Webber).

I think that's part of the glamour of F1. As is the other stuff John mentions... the politics, the drama... F1 is much like Professional Wrestling... what goes on behind the scenes adds more to the racing than in other series.

What has been wrong in the past few years is that the other players have not stepped up their game. Changing the rules does not change the fact that teams that cannot adapt do not win. Red Bull has adapted... and even before the mid-season tire change of 2013, they were coming to grips better with the formula than other erstwhile front-runners from the 2012 season, McLaren and Mercedes.

I have high hopes for this season, as it's a new battlefield, with unfamiliar territory for all. But I have no doubt that we will know the eventual winner by midway through the season. That's just the way it is.

 
Oh, I agree completely.

I'd actually quite like to see them turn up the engineering aspect a bit. This year is going to be great (go tusky Lotus!), but no doubt in a couple of years the top teams will have most of the stuff figured out and everyone will converge around a single "best" design with minor tweaks per team.

I think if each season they chose a major component to have very loose restrictions, it'd be great to see what teams came up. At the end of the season clamp the rules down again around the most suitable design, and open up a new area for development.

Keeps costs low by not having to do major dev work on EVERY component of the cars, keeps the engineering interesting by giving wide scope for innovation, keeps the sport progressing by incorporating those innovations once made.

There's probably a ton of reasons why this wouldn't work and be dumb, but after I've had a few beers I always get all wistful about it. :)
 
F1 is interesting because everybody watch it..
The excitement is where we feel like being part of that millions of others who follow the sport.
It almost feels like going out on a party rather than watching a sport in a livingroom, and the TV commentators also plays a big role to this excitement..
 
'Everybody' watches it because it's interesting, not the other way around.
 
One can say.

What is so exciting about watching cars go around an oval 500 times?
Each motor sport has its own fan-base and they like the sport for what it is.
 
Watch a NASCAR race and youll see why people love F1. F1 still is the highest form of auto racing in the world with the most sophisticated cars.
 
@Bakemono36 Watch a sports car race, or a touring car race, or even a rally, and you'll see why there are people who can't stand F1. I agree that F1 is (for now) the most prestigious form of motor racing in the world, but at the end of the day motor racing is a relatively niche interest in comparison to other sports such as Footballism or Cricket, and the reason that so many people follow F1 is basically that it's the only motor racing they get exposed to, and hey, F1 isn't bad by any stretch of the imagination. Overcommercialised? Yes. Not as exciting to watch as other forms of motor racing? Often. (Although there have been occasions where F1 has very much delivered in this regard, even if those have been lacking for the past couple of years) Unenjoyable to watch on a lazy Sunday afternoon? Not at all.*
























Better than NASCAR? You bet!
 
Whatever F1 was in the past and whatever it is now, F1 still has the best drivers and cars on the planet.

Drivers still have to go out on track every weekend and at least try to finish first. Just like they had do to in the 90's, absolutely nothing has changed here.

I started watching F1 in '94 and I highly doubt I will ever stop.
 
I like F1, but to be honest the racing have become too boring, processional and less focused on the drivers and more about the technology.

IMO if F1 is regain its glory its going to have be like F1 of the 80's where drivers were king and the technology was secondary at test. Ontop of that F1 need to drop these stupid street circuits such as monaco because in the end they are contributing to the problem than helping. Even the most ardent F1 must admit this.
 
Watch a NASCAR race and youll see why people love F1. F1 still is the highest form of auto racing in the world with the most sophisticated cars.

eh, I consider MotoGP is highest form of racing period over NASCAR and F1 and simpily because the racing is far more real and not just because of the bikes, but mainly due the fact it focuses more on the riders than the technology.
 
I love MotoGP, and I likewise consider it possibly the pinnacle of motor racing, but considering first second and third in last year's championship all came from the same team...

MotoGP has the potential for more even racing, but there are seasons and strings of seasons where one team dominates. The only difference there is that many teams can share a chassis... but in the end, even if you had a Honda last year, no way were you going to beat Repsol Honda.
 
Aside from Drag racing, and the IndyCar oval races, F1 cars are essentially the fastest circuit cars out there. That itself is a big appeal.

I mean cmon there is almost nothing like it:



At this point the reasons for the continued appeal for F1 have all pretty much been stated. But I feel the OP's source of inspiration stems from their frustration with the series. With the way the regulations influence the racing now, it can be understandable to be upset with it. It's like it used to be, they did this back then, now they do this and that and it's boring, etc.

What else can be said other than just take it for what it is and pay attention to the broadcasts a little more sometime. You'll still find some hardcore racing in there.

I like F1, but to be honest the racing have become too boring, processional and less focused on the drivers and more about the technology.

IMO if F1 is regain its glory its going to have be like F1 of the 80's where drivers were king and the technology was secondary at test. Ontop of that F1 need to drop these stupid street circuits such as monaco because in the end they are contributing to the problem than helping. Even the most ardent F1 must admit this.

Monaco ain't that terrible in my opinion. It has so much history to it as well...it will never get dropped. Perhaps it wouldn't be so bad to try and widen it a bit though. Not too much, but just enough so it's not so much of a parade.
 
Monaco ain't that terrible in my opinion. It has so much history to it as well...it will never get dropped. Perhaps it wouldn't be so bad to try and widen it a bit though. Not too much, but just enough so it's not so much of a parade.
It is. Most people I know only watch the Monaco GP. That's probably why they think F1 is boring. I can't even remember the last time we had a decent Monaco race.
 
Well Nico holding up the entire field and Perez going carnage was "interesting" last year, but I agree that exciting racing hasn't happened there (or on most other tracks) in a long time.
 
Also F1 has a storied history; which helps keeps fans even if they are pining for the old days. Definitely glad that it is safer, as Miki Lauda points out that when he was first racing in F1 there were driver's deaths each season.

I also think the classic circuits hold an attraction too (Monza, Spa, Suzuka) :)
 
I personally enjoy the off track battle off track as much as the battle on track (ie. design and engineering).

If you ask me, that's really what makes F1 the pinnacle of motorsport. Even though the new v6 engines don't sound as good as the v8 (the V10 was my personal favourite), it's at the forefront of automotive technology. Jensen Button even stayed that it felt like the most powerful engine he has driven due to the torque it produces
 
F1 was my first exposure to international motorsports. I think it was the most accessible auto racing discipline for me to watch and follow, back in my home country, where they'd air each Grand Prix live. I believe I develop a hardheaded attachment to the series because of that.

I do watch other races from other racing series when I get the chance to do so, or when there's nothing good on TV and I encounter a rerun, but I don't constantly follow what's going on in them. I'd try to find streams for major endurance races like 24 Hours of Le Mans and 24 Hours Nürburgring, and watch them for a few hours.

Last year, other than F1 races, one other race aired live that I watched in full length was the Indy 500. It's my first full-length exposure to open-wheel racing on an oval. The high frequency of overtakes was a stunning sight, but after a while, some of them felt just like being passed on the freeway. (just like passing with DRS in F1, after all, but with more effort, without using the incentive of reduced drag with the hit of a button) I haven't fully watched the IndyCar races in road courses, but I've heard they're pretty eventful for the most part. But it still doesn't make me wanna ditch F1, somehow.

I still find F1 somewhat intriguing. I appreciate the high technicality, how each team makes their own cars, and the huge challenge they take when there are so many restrictions. I kinda lament it a bit when I look back into history and see how cars from different teams could have so much difference in terms of looks. But again, I'm only 19, so maybe I don't fully share the same sentiment with the older fans. The first time I watched an F1 race, it was already the V10 era. Even Ayrton Senna was already gone when I was born. To some people, the middle of the V10 era was already getting boring, despite the uniquely high-pitched V10 noise, and aggregate lap times eventually being faster compared to now or other eras. Seeing the name M SCHUMACHER beside the number 1 on TV was such a common thing, and being a very naive Ferrari fan that I was, it wasn't hard for me to relish that. Seeing him at the front of the grid nearly all the time with his red car created the impression that Ferrari and him were the heroic icon of Formula One, or something along the lines of that.

Maybe inherently, I didn't start out as a proper fan of the sport. Maybe I appreciated it more like a spectacle, than a competition of utter fairness. I do always think of motor racing as another full-fledged expression of cars as a form of exhilaration; knowing the attempt to build cars to be as fast as they can under a set of regulations, and seeing them being pushed near or to the limit by those dedicated to follow such lives, simply pleases the partly hedonistic inside of me. But now, as a grown up, do I just enjoy the sights and sounds of such extraordinary, purpose-built machines going at ridiculous speeds around a racetrack, or do I expect to see more to be satisfied, to see greater quantity of on-track battles between drivers, which will actually add to the spectacle as well? I do, and do I still get it in the first racing series that introduced me to the world of motor racing? Well, sort of, it's just not that frequent! The same person winning over and over again? Witnessed that a decade ago already. Some cars managed to be superior? Witnessed that a decade ago already. Strange new rules? Well...they're not very much appreciated. But once in a while there are tight battles on the track that keep me glued to the screen, even though they're not in front. And the idea of the spectacle is still not gone when there are no battles at a point in time. I still really like it. There's the potential of me following it less in the future, gravitating towards another racing series. But again, I'll watch F1 when it comes around and I have the chance, and I won't ditch it.


"Why do we do this? Each year, 2 of us die."

Are you talking about the first scene in "Rush"? Because I don't think the real Niki Lauda said that for real. You made it sound like he was racing simply because he had a death wish. :lol:

If I recall correctly, the sentence before, "And each year, two of us die", was him telling that there were twenty-five drivers in a season, or something along the lines of that.
 
Last edited:
Watch a NASCAR race and youll see why people love F1. F1 still is the highest form of auto racing in the world with the most sophisticated cars.

Apples and oranges, different disciplines, different road rules, different race rules... you can't compare NASCAR with any Euro road discipline (like F1).

I love them both, incidentally :D
 
I think there's something fundamentally wrong with the F1 regs. Auto GP is exactly what F1 should be in my eyes, fast single seaters with very close racing and no gimmicks. Also, because the mainstream media perceives F1 as the only form of motorsport, F1 tarnishes motorsport's reputation.
 
I watch F1 because, these are cars I can't drive. If I can view it on video or television, I'll watch it. I go to the AGP every year because its a classic event. May be a headache to the council and some local residents but, Albert Park is down the street from me and first race of the year? I'm there until they cancel the event.

I too miss the old Hockenhiem, A1 Ring(glad it's back), Adelaide, Imola, etc. Plus, I never got to see the turbo cars of the 1980's race live. Now I get to see the new generation.
 
Auto GP is exactly what F1 should be in my eyes, fast single seaters with very close racing and no gimmicks.

In what world are they fast? They are 6 seconds slower than GP2 at Silverstone and 16 seconds slower than F1. Plus, it's a spec series, which would kill one of the most interesting parts of F1.
 
Let's see you drive one at the limits. 550hp in a 700kg car is fast.
 
And where did I say fastest?
I think they seriously need to evaluate a spec tub of sorts, as well as drop all gimmicks, fragile over-designed aero and just run simple, effective cars. Something in the rulebook has to be hugely amiss if despite DRS, ERS, crap (supposedly exciting) tyres etc, they still can't produce good racing against a series that runs simple aero kits, durable and safe tyres and that refuses to touch gimmicks.
 
Back