Elitists complaining about physics. Hmm, where have I seen that before?
Well, your thread is pointless really.
With our personal expertise in that area - playing almost all available titles on all available platforms - comes the need to get the best virtual experience we can get. Advancement in technology and overall advancement in all areas important for virtual recreation of racing has led us to level of expectations we all have towards all new titles - not just one in general.
Care to explain who are "elitist"? That particular term become so popular recently and I really fail to understand the context of it's usage. Thank you in advance.
and you sir are real close to thinking your an elitist
Care to explain who are "elitist"? That particular term become so popular recently and I really fail to understand the context of it's usage. Thank you in advance.
Regards physics people forget one major factor.
These are games, they are meant to be fun to enjoy and entertain.
Peoples crusade or high demands for accurate realisim in handling and physics from a console are kinda kidding themselves.
Even my own personal desires for taking audio/tactile and utilising multiscreens with a good wheel in a cockpit is for "entertainment" not for chasing some degree of simulation accuracy or realisim.
Who else still plays for fun?
For some people, fun = realism. I'm one of them. But I won't go and bash games like NFS because clearly they aren't meant to be as realistic as those PC sims. Having said that, drifting in shift 2 is just plain terrible.![]()
Care to elaborate? Thank you in advance.
People in general are ignorant, spiteful beings. Survival of the fittest and all.Why do so many people insist on badmouthing shift?
Especially when they either A they havent played it B are just want to complain about something and C the prefer GT5 and shouldnt have bothered with another game
Well, How about...
1 - They enjoy all driving games on the consoles. In the past year or so I have played GT5, Ferrari Challenge, Superstars V8, Forza 3 and Shift 1.
2 - The driving in Shift is bad. It feels like my car has a pivot point under it, and that Youtube video of the EVO spinning like a top is how it is.
3 - This is GTPlanet. The place with trained Crime Scene Investigators.
GT5 was ripped to shreds on this site, and yet you question the same thing happening to S2?![]()
For one thing if I hadnt pre ordeed GT5 and had come here and read the reviews I wouldnt have bought it at all
With shift 2 the opposite happened (thanks to my experience with GT5) because I can tell the difference between an honest opinion and a spoild brat whinning... so Im definitly getting this one because it looks like actual fun (unlike GT5)
I'll disagree with you on GT5's fun factor. I don't need hyper AI with ultra competitiveness to have fun. If that is what I am after, I'll go online in GT5.
Shift 2 does a lot of things right. But the driving to me feels so wrong, and the driving in itself, is where I draw the "fun" from.
Maybe you need to mess with the settings a bit, but you would probably be right if the online wasnt full with rammers, idiots and little kids that dont now better...
Well, your thread is pointless really.
"Badmouthing" is one thing, being critical about something is another. Third dimension is being "constructive critical" where you notice some issues and contextualize them in order to provoke either reaction of interested parties or start the constructive discussion.
Your thread is basically complaining about complaining and that is greatest achievement of all recent boards.
Also please understand that many of members here are general fans of virtual racing, not just one particular title.
With our personal expertise in that area - playing almost all available titles on all available platforms - comes the need to get the best virtual experience we can get. Advancement in technology and overall advancement in all areas important for virtual recreation of racing has led us to level of expectations we all have towards all new titles - not just one in general.
When somebody announce something using some words and phrases that lead people to believe that some product will fulfill some expectations in some areas than expectation become greater.
Highlighting certain areas of personal disappointment and subjective views on some issues - when contextualized in overall appearance of particular product - could be perceived differently by different persons.
However, I can draw a very clear line about somebody just speaking nonsense or somebody being critical or constructively critical.
As soon as you realize that being critical about something does not mean negativism per-se, you will be able to separate yourself from the same bunch of people you're referring in the opening post. Until than, you'll be the same as those you're criticizing.
Care to explain who are "elitist"? That particular term become so popular recently and I really fail to understand the context of it's usage. Thank you in advance.
2 - The driving in Shift is bad. It feels like my car has a pivot point under it, and that Youtube video of the EVO spinning like a top is how it is.
That is basically GRID's description. You sure the same problem exists in Shift 2?
Go play the opening GTR training section. It's bad.
I adjusted the settings and restarted several times, and I still couldn't get Shift 2 to "feel" right.
Some folks will not like Shift2, they can express their opinions, i do not see that as bad mouthing. Same as folks who do not like GT5. Folks should just stop talking crap about one to make the other look better, that's just pathetic.
Now that i have played shift2, i can say i like them both. They are both good games with their own set of issues. So it's win-win for me. wooohooo!![]()
Great news you like it as it didnt seem you were digging it before release 👍
Especially when they either A they havent played it B are just want to complain about something and C the prefer GT5 and shouldnt have bothered with another game