'Thou shalt not lay down traction at the front as thou doth at the rear! It is an abomination.'
Driftiticus 18:21-23
10/90 Torque split is not legitimate drifting. You have power going to the front wheels, and that allows you to get more angle. It also allows the car to grab at the asphalt more and propel itself forward faster. Additionally, it becomes harder to spin out in an AWD car, opposed to a RWD car; that simple
'Thou shalt not lay down traction at the front as thou doth at the rear! It is an abomination.'
Driftiticus 18:21-23
X2True, I've seen it written in the drift bible.
Well Technically speaking 4wd drifting is still drifting, just not what was initially used when it was created or discovered. As long as the rear slip angle is greater then the front slip angle, your drifting. My theory on why rear wheel cars where initially used is because it was probably discovered on a FR car due to the back end being easy to slip out, hence people followed suit.
10/90 Torque split is not legitimate drifting. You have power going to the front wheels, and that allows you to get more angle. It also allows the car to grab at the asphalt more and propel itself forward faster. Additionally, it becomes harder to spin out in an AWD car, opposed to a RWD car; that simple...I don't see how these threads are allowed to be posted anymore
10/90 Torque split is not legitimate drifting. You have power going to the front wheels, and that allows you to get more angle. It also allows the car to grab at the asphalt more and propel itself forward faster. Additionally, it becomes harder to spin out in an AWD car, opposed to a RWD car; that simple...I don't see how these threads are allowed to be posted anymore
Also, a lot of you guys don't make sense either. Some of you actually think that drifting AWDs require less technique and skill? Not only that, some of you are saying it's not drifting, but gymkhana or whatever you guys are calling it. You think the Evo in the Tokyo Drift movie was made RWD so it'll be harder to drift? Is it arrogance or what?
At the risk of correcting some one who hasn't made a mistake, you do know the Evo was converted to RWD?
At the risk of correcting some one who hasn't made a mistake, you do know the Evo was converted to RWD?
??
Also, a lot of you guys don't make sense either. Some of you actually think that drifting AWDs require less technique and skill? Not only that, some of you are saying it's not drifting, but gymkhana or whatever you guys are calling it. You think the Evo in the Tokyo Drift movie was made RWD so it'll be harder to drift? Is it arrogance or what?
so if i read this right
awd
-more angle
-faster 'drifts'
-less easy to spin
fr
-less angle
-slower 'drifts'
-easier to spin
playing devils advocate for a second,
why would anyone want to 'drift' a obviously inferior FR car ?
''hey I'm an awesome drifter with my 220hp zilvia, i don't drift awd cause they are not 'legitimate', the way awd's mechanically spin the front tires and %10 of the power moves the wrong wheels, and I still think I'm above drifting an awd, I like doing 24mph drifts in my zilvia when the awd pass me sideways at 75mph i kick them out of the lobby'' - quote by any awesome at complaining virtural gaming drifter elitist
since were getting so technical about %10 here and there, drifting in a video simulation is not 'legitimate' either, drifting in real life would be considered 'legitimate', as in taking your car in the driveway to a track, paying $75 to signing your life away and going and finding out what 'legitimate drifting' it is about
correct me if i'm wrong but no car w/in the F&F series was drifting awd, the evo in tokyo drift was well publicized as a rwd converted one...as far as sliding the awd vehicles, you can blame the same competitions you're referring to(d1, fd, etc...) it is the impreza and evo, etc... that have been converted w/in these contests that have sparked interest in drifting other things besides s-chassis and hachirokus...i'm fairly sure if GT5 allowed the disconnection of front axles, and welding of center diffs, more people would actually do it, but GT only allows for the 10/90 split, and so people make do. no, it doesn't mean they should be allowed to brag about their awesome skills, as we all know that 10% has a lot to do w/ it. but how else can people diversify what is drifted? if you have a better way to allow those whom have a legnum vr4 enjoy drifting/sliding/gymkhana-ing w/ it, then we're all ears...amazing how drifters, who tend to be excluded from other motorsport enthusiasts, as non-legitimate, illegitimize those who don't drift exactly how'd they prefer...maybe somebody just needs to make a room/team full of 10/90 awd drifters, because i'd hate to be kicked from a room, not for talking smack, or from impeding anyone else's drifitng experience, but just because the impreza i'm using has 10/90 split, which is the maximum that PD allowed us...btw my primary drifter is a supra 3.0 just in case anybody thinks i'm yet another awd bleeding heart. i just like to know that i can diversify my car selection a bit....Where did this seemingly sudden obsession with sliding AWD vehicles come from?
Tokyo Drift is a freaking movie. Much like the Fast & Furious series, a lot of things may be overly exaggerated to increase dramatic effect. (Drive your Civic under a semi...)
Any AWD cars you see in competitions have been CONVERTED. As such, you'll never be able to enter a GT5 drift tournament as long as the true culture is upheld.
Finally, Ken Block is a not a drifter. Sam Hubinette is.
??
This makes no sense. The fact that you have power to the front wheels would make it harder for you to get more angle. The point of making AWDs 10/90 split is to make it resemble a RWD as much as possible so it'd be easier to get more angle. Having more power to the front balances and stabilizes the car more, so how in the world does it help with getting more angles?
Also, a lot of you guys don't make sense either. Some of you actually think that drifting AWDs require less technique and skill? Not only that, some of you are saying it's not drifting, but gymkhana or whatever you guys are calling it. You think the Evo in the Tokyo Drift movie was made RWD so it'll be harder to drift? Is it arrogance or what?
RWDs are the easy ones to drift and get angle. Look at all the high scores on DTs. I can drift most of them stock. AWDs require more setups and emphasis on weight transfer during iniation to be able to properly drift through one corner. Try drifting and HKS Evo and tell me it's easy to get a drift angle on that, and how it'll require less technique.
Of course the RX7 looks better in that video. It's "easier" to actually drift it, then the Subaru. To some of you think that AWDs are easier to drift, you're probably not doing it right.
True, I've seen it written in the drift bible.
Well Technically speaking 4wd drifting is still drifting, just not what was initially used when it was created or discovered. As long as the rear slip angle is greater then the front slip angle, your drifting. My theory on why rear wheel cars where initially used is because it was probably discovered on a FR car due to the back end being easy to slip out, hence people followed suit.
okay for the Moderator's sake can we end this topic? Maybe sticky it because this will go on and on and on.... And you know most noobs dont search. Stop asking the question, All the true real drifters (and some not) know that rwd is true, drifting awd not, a converted awd is only a rwd too. This thread has explained it more than throughly with true facts. End.
I watched the Drift Bible. Didn't catch it.
This is more of it. The sport of drifting was started with lightweight rear-wheel drive machines, which is why, traditionally, drifting is done with such. AWD is banned because it's too easy to power out of a drift, but seriously... saying it's not "drifting" just because you're using an AWD car is like saying "it's not golf" if you use the wrong kind of driver or a non-competition spec golf ball... or saying "it's not baseball" if you use an aluminum bat.
You get the car sideways in a controlled manner... that's a drift. The same techniques (except for power-over) can be used on any car, FWD, RWD or AWD. The sport recognizes this, which is why FWD cars aren't banned. AWD cars are only banned because they're an unfair advantage... not because "it's not drifting!"
If you want to do a competitive professional-style drift, by all means, go RWD and lock the room to RWD. But "drifting", for me, is first and foremost about FUN. And fun knows no race, creed, religion or drivetrain type.
Thank you.
all agreed, so somebody start a mass petition we can twitter/facebook/email Kaz to introduce a patch that allows a truly full VCD so that subie and evo (and skyline)lovers aren't blacklisted...you know you want to drift a rwd 22b, skyline gt-r, evo(insert # here), PD just needs to make it happen
lol.
Someday when you're better at drifting (in GT5) you'll think back to this post and give yourself a mental facepalm.
I'm no purist, i like sliding around in AWD vehicles. I love rally racing, but it requires more skill to drift RWD.
The reason people dont drift AWD in real life is because it requires massive power (to break traction in all 4 wheels) and is HELL on your drivetrain...which is expensive and a bitch to work on because it's an awd drivetrain.
Just FYI in real life my last car was a Celica GT4 and my current ride is a 350z. I've spent time sliding around in both cars under various conditions.
okay for the Moderator's sake can we end this topic? Maybe sticky it because this will go on and on and on.... And you know most noobs dont search. Stop asking the question, All the true real drifters (and some not) know that rwd is true, drifting awd not, a converted awd is only a rwd too. This thread has explained it more than throughly with true facts. End.