Why isn't the Nike 2022 in Gt5

  • Thread starter I Love GT6
  • 47 comments
  • 6,531 views
GT5 - "Hey Nike, we want to put your car in our game."
Nike - "Ok cool, that'll be $xxx,xxx..."
GT5 - "Nevermind."

...or something like that.
 
It's a bummer, though PD could maybe just rerelease it, but instead of being a Nike car it could be a Gran Turismo car.
 
GT5 - "Hey Nike, we want to put your car in our game."
Nike - "Ok cool, that'll be $xxx,xxx..."
GT5 - "Nevermind."

...or something like that.

Same thing with many other cars not in game, such as the everlasting Porsche argument.
 
For the same reason X2010 might not be in GT6.
Nike 2022 was GT4 exclusive car, in the same way X2010 is for GT5. What's the point having in on GT5?
 
What do you mean?

Whatever deal that got the car purpose-made for use in GT4 was almost certainly done for a one game term.


Which is quite a shame, because it would have been nice to actually use it in GT5, but them's the breaks.
 
Might have something to do with the fact that there's no actual model of the car to go by if they were to create a premium version of it at any point in time.
 
Might have something to do with the fact that there's no actual model of the car to go by if they were to create a premium version of it at any point in time.
Actually, they could probably very easily make a Premium out of it. I'm pretty sure the designer of the car when he was posting on here about it back in the day said that PD modeled it part-by-part anyways, and they had to cut it down in detail severely to even get it to work in GT4 at all.
 
Funny because brands are offering money to have their cars included. They see it as a form of advertising.
 
Licencing.

GT5 - "Hey Nike, we want to put your car in our game."
Nike - "Ok cool, that'll be $xxx,xxx..."
GT5 - "Nevermind."

...or something like that.

Same thing with many other cars not in game, such as the everlasting Porsche argument.
You are all wrong the car designed by both Nike and PD. They both have the rights to the car.
The driving position for this car is insane :scared:
Any pictures of it in with the driver in?

IMG0016.JPG
1uw5.jpg
 
Never understood the point of these so called concept designs, that never existed nor they will irl :(
That's why I never bother with the red-bull thingy, impossible to drive with a normail controller and it's only good use is to give it to Bob, so he can finish the race quicker :lol:
 
Actually, they could probably very easily make a Premium out of it. I'm pretty sure the designer of the car when he was posting on here about it back in the day said that PD modeled it part-by-part anyways, and they had to cut it down in detail severely to even get it to work in GT4 at all.

I remember that thread where he showed up.
It's here for anyone who is curious.
 
That's not how licencing agreements work.

OK. I never said any thing about licencing. And if they want to use the car in GT5 they could have used it but they had to change the name and remove the Nike logo just as the did with some race cars. But the car was made for GT4 so leave it for GT4 only.
 
And if they want to use the car in GT5 they could have used it but they had to change the name and remove the Nike logo just as the did with some race cars.
Unless Nike part-owns the copyright for the design itself. Or if Phil Frank part-owns the copyright for the design itself. Or the licence for the car's design was specifically made for GT4 only. Or any number of things that would have made it so the car could not have been ported to GT5.

PD having helped design the car does not give them carte blanche ability to use it however they see fit in the series, because the key word is "helped." I would be surprised if the same thing didn't apply to the X1.
 
Was a cool car but screw Nike. Seriously they are a bullcrap multi-billion dollar company selling inferiority complexes to kids across America. Be Michael Jordan or be no one. Like the people working our sweatshops in other countries.

Screw Nike. Let real car companies handle cars while Nike handles stepping on the little guy.

My point is I'd rather not have a company with such ridiculous moral stances building hot wheels cars just to get more advertising where it doesn't belong. Let's stand for some decency and realize the underhanded motives of this company.
 
Never understood the point of these so called concept designs, that never existed nor they will irl :(
That's why I never bother with the red-bull thingy, impossible to drive with a normail controller and it's only good use is to give it to Bob, so he can finish the race quicker :lol:

I would not be surprised to see a racecar similar to the X2010 in about ten or so years. It's a more down to Earth type of car PD's gone with.
 
Bottoz
GT5 - "Hey Nike, we want to put your car in our game."
Nike - "Ok cool, that'll be $xxx,xxx..."
GT5 - "Nevermind."

...or something like that.

slashfan7964
Funny because brands are offering money to have their cars included. They see it as a form of advertising.
I always thought it was more like what Slashfan said.

GT5: "Can we put your car in the game?"
Chevy: "You mean you will put one of our cars in your video game so people can race it around and see how cool it is?"
GT5: "Yup."
Chevy: "Where do I sign!"

I would think car companies would love free advertising for anyone who wants exposure, not to be paid for it.
 
It may be due to licensing matters but personally I'm afraid to say that's because there's already the X2010 featuring similar traits as the nike F1 2022? They both have in common with the fact that they're simulated to be designed to become future F1 kind machines yet released and be seen in real life.
 

Latest Posts

Back