Like this: Rediculous. I keep using an 'e' when it should be an 'i'. A guy I knew in high school used to mockingly correct me on Facebook whenever I did that, hehe.In what manner do you misspell it? Something that's ridiculous arouses and/or deserves ridicule. If you're less likely to misspell the latter and you cognitively link it to the former, as it is linked, you may train yourself to spell the former correctly.
Consider that the guy on Facebook also derided you. Deride is related to ridicule, and may be a useful reminder of the appropriate spelling.Like this: Rediculous. I keep using an 'e' when it should be an 'i'. A guy I knew in high school used to mockingly correct me on Facebook whenever I did that, hehe.
I usually just use the word during the former situation you describe, but thanks. I might try that.
Yeah, it could. We'll see, maybe this conversation will finally break the curse.Consider that the guy on Facebook also derided you. Deride is related to ridicule, and may be a useful reminder of the appropriate spelling.
Wait, what? Drip is a slang word now? I've never heard of that one.Drip.
No, not as in falling liquid droplets but whatever it means in slang. I'm tired of seeing it.
"Iconic", people calling things iconic when they're not. I.E. A Mitsubishi Eclipse.
I have to disagree with you on that one. The old Eclipse is iconic and has been all over the racing scene for years now."Iconic", people calling things iconic when they're not. I.E. A Mitsubishi Eclipse.
Being all over a racing scene makes a car popular. Popularity =/= Iconic.I have to disagree with you on that one. The old Eclipse is iconic and has been all over the racing scene for years now.
Never heard of that one.stan
Both a verb and a noun, meaning to be overzealously defensive or supportive about a person.
He stans Anthony Martial so much.
These Elon Musk stans are just cringe edgelords.
A modern slang term which I absolutely hate.
Being a star car of a classic film helps.Being all over a racing scene makes a car popular. Popularity =/= Iconic.
Still don't agree, I just don't think it's impactful enough to be at iconic status.Being a star car of a classic film helps.
DANGER TO MANIFOLD!!
Yup, I understand this. I've had to deal with hearing dope used this way during my whole time at high school. Various classmates I sat with used this constantly.Dope.
Particularly when it's used as an adjective, if it's referencing the substance or using it as an insult, I have no issue with that. I don't really know what to say about this other than the fact I just never liked it when people used it as an adjective to describe things. The fact it reminds me too much of the rap music I used to in my youth (which I'd rather forget about), really doesn't help matters.
High school was around the time I heard it most, but it was mostly in rap music I listened to at the time.Yup, I understand this. I've had to deal with hearing dope used this way during my whole time at high school. Various classmates I sat with used this constantly.
I have no issue with it being used in this case, it's what I meant when I said "using it as an insult". I should clarify a little further about what I meant when I said "adjective", I was referring to when people used it as a slang to describe something they felt was good. Such asDope is like the 2000s/early 2010s version of "Stupid", you know how some kids in the 90s apparently used "stupid" as an adjective. Well, I'm at least guessing it; I remember Will Smith saying it a lot like that on Fresh Prince of Bel Air.
I don't hear it much anymore, but once in a while I do and can't say I am fond of it.This game is dope!
But it's popular BECAUSE it's good, not the other way around. The original Eclipse is 30 years old and still being raced on the drag strip because of THAT engine, which is known to be very strong and reliable. It can take lot of abuse before it blows up. You cannot deny that the 4G63 is an iconic engine which sits alongside the LS3, 2JZ, RB26 and B16-B. I know that Mitsubishi has tarnished the legacy of the nameplate, but the Eclipse has been a mainstay of car culture FOR YEARS and I don't think that will change anytime soon.Being all over a racing scene makes a car popular. Popularity =/= Iconic.
Yes, I agree that's it's good, but that doesn't mean iconic.But it's popular BECAUSE it's good, not the other way around.
Yes, the Eclipse has been a huge mainstay in car culture and yes to the 4G63. However, it's still just not enough to qualify it as an icon.. The original Eclipse is 30 years old and still being raced on the drag strip because of THAT engine, which is known to be very strong and reliable. It can take lot of abuse before it blows up. You cannot deny that the 4G63 is an iconic engine which sits alongside the LS3, 2JZ, RB26 and B16-B. I know that Mitsubishi has tarnished the legacy of the nameplate, but the Eclipse has been a mainstay of car culture FOR YEARS and I don't think that will change anytime soon.
Being absolutely good and well-known is not the same as being iconic, being iconic goes beyond that. It has to be something that a common person would recognize, not just car nerds. I doubt a normal person is going to know what an Eclipse is, in spite of the Fast and Furious movies.
Being absolutely good and well-known is not the same as being iconic, being iconic goes beyond that. It has to be something that a common person would recognize, not just car nerds. I doubt a normal person is going to know what an Eclipse is, in spite of the Fast and Furious movies.
You certainly have a point there, iconic could be something within a small group and not getting acclaim. Especially with your example on the GT40.It's certainly possible for something to be considered iconic within a smaller group. It's pretty much the same thing as someone being able to be considered a legend despite never getting widespread acclaim.
Take this GT40 for instance, if you were to show it to a "common" person and ask them who sponsored the car they would probably give you a blank stare, but I'd imagine most race fans wouldn't even let you finish the question
You certainly have a point there, iconic could be something within a small group and not getting acclaim. Especially with your example on the GT40.
However, my problem with this idea is that if I'm calling a Mitsubishi Eclipse iconic, then that means I'm holding it to the same regard as the Ford GT40. My view on iconic is that it has to be something absolutely special, I just can't ever see myself ever thinking that about an Eclipse despite all of the good things it has going for it. Holding it to the same level as a GT40 just feels well...wrong.
With the blue and orange, there's no questioning who its primary sponsor is. Firefox, obvs.It's certainly possible for something to be considered iconic within a smaller group. It's pretty much the same thing as someone being able to be considered a legend despite never getting widespread acclaim.
Take this GT40 for instance, if you were to show it to a "common" person and ask them who sponsored the car they would probably give you a blank stare, but I'd imagine most race fans wouldn't even let you finish the question.