Matej
Premium
- 2,014
- Zagreb
Ok but remember, deadline for second run is 28 November.Im gonna stick with the RSi
I'll get my times done soon (been away for a week so it was impossible at the time)
Ok but remember, deadline for second run is 28 November.Im gonna stick with the RSi
I'll get my times done soon (been away for a week so it was impossible at the time)
I agree, sometimes is hard to find 2 hours to play; since not all players have posted their times I will give a new deadline - 4 DecemberI think you should give us more,because it's hard to find time to do enduros
it seems i won't do the enduro
offtopic:SVX,when are you going to post your time at guess that time thread?
Trial Mountain Reverse:
1st Nilloc 3'21.087 10pts
2nd one inch man 3'23.635 8pts
3rd greaterbadass 3'25.659 6pts
4th tricd04 3'27.336 5pts
5th Matej 3'29.888 4pts
6th shotamagee 3'30.887 3pts
7th amkobih 3'31.135 2pts
8th SVX 3'33.671 1pts
Apricot Hill Raceway:
1st greaterbadass 4'39.226 10pts
2nd Nilloc 4'44.135 8pts
3rd one inch man 4'49.751 6pts
4th amkobih 4'51.534 5pts
5th tricd04 4'54.999 4pts
6th SVX 4'55.633 3pts
7th shotamagee 4'56.721 2pts
8th Matej 4'57.273 1pts
Clubman Stage Route 5:
1st greaterbadass 4'58.529 10pts
2nd one inch man 5'01.886 8pts
3rd Nilloc 5'03.108 6pts
4th tricd04 5'07.970 5pts
5th SVX 5'14.346 4pts
6th shotamagee 5'15.004 3pts
7th Matej 5'16.779 2pts
8th amkobih 5'18.258 1pts
Infineon Raceway - Stock Car Course:
1st one inch man 11'01.168 10pts
2nd tricd04 11'02.133 8pts
3rd Nilloc 11'14.426 6pts
4th shotamagee 11'24.471 5pts
5th amkobih 11'25.855 4pts
6th Matej 11'34.878 3pts
7th greaterbadass 15'45.707 2pts
8th SVX DNF
El Capitan 200 miles:
1st one inch man 2:08'51.676 10pts
2nd shotamagee 2:12'51.287 8pts
3rd SVX 2:14'10.123 6pts
4th Nilloc 2:23'13.620 5pts
5th greaterbadass DNF
6th amkobih DNF
7th tricd04 DNF
8th Matej DNF
Also one inch man and tricd04 are pulling away from the rest of the field so they MUST change their vehicles with something from FF group otherwise I won't count their times. one inch man should pick worse FF car then tricd04.
As long as the Honda CIVIC TYPE R (EP) 2004 is FF, I'll be taking it for my next 300 HP beast... Except for the whole "beast" part, that is!
I didn't change anything for round 2. So I wouldn't say, that I'm pulling away. It's a steady performance, the others are just getting worse
If an EK Civic Type R is considered a worse car, than an EP one, I'll be taking that one. Although I'm not really prepared to give up the Sprinter...
Yes, although EK is a good car (when we talk about FF cars of course ) it can't match EP so your choice is fine, just tell which version you want to drive, '97 or '98. Happy wheelspin
Sure, no problem.Can I please stick with my car?
I was wondering if it wouldn't be more fair to add ballast to cars as a "prize" for winning instead of going all the way to requiring a switch to FFs? 💡
It might be too late for this series, also I haven't been able to test to see if it makes a significant enough disadvantage in GT4?
Yeah more ballast, or dropping some power (eg down to 250-275) for the top two, would be better than forcing a car (or drivetrain) change I think.
Before creating this challenge I wanted for all players to drive as many hot hatches as possible, to gather as many experience (by driving different types of vehicles) as possible. That was my primary idea from beginning and thus sticking with the same car idea is not equivalent with my thoughts.
But, FF cars are suffering in GT4 (lack of physics) so driving them might be boring, I totally understand that. It's also never too late to do some changes; this is what I thought since already three players did recommend something ( it might be more than three eventually - needs of most ) :
Adding ballast might not be good idea, extra weight reduces hot hatches originality and it looks poor - cheap method to ruin your car.
On the other hand, power reduce seems much better decision, I think this is something that keeps vehicles realistic in terms of tuning, in that case one inch man (fastest so far) should choose between two options : whether to swap Trueno for Civic Type-r or to lower Trueno power to range from original (I think 136 with oiling) hp to 200 hp. Same goes for tricd04 - either Honda EP 2004 or lowering R5 power to range 230 to 250 hp.
In that case ^ drivers with low points (SVX, Matej) should stick with their vehicles or swap them for something else.
Please let me know what you think so that I can enforce this method.
look with a different meaning. Imagine Trueno with extra 200 kg - that's about 1055 kg. This would ruin car originality - something that neither Trueno would accept. I still think this is bad idea, and I will try not to enforce this.I'm not quite sure how ballast ruins the look of your car, but ignoring that point
although I don't understand Corolla part; which Corolla and why ?
Seriously? The Toyota Corolla Levin GT-Apex AE86 '83, which I've been using the whole time is a good bet. I'm just saying I've spent a fair bit of $ on parts and time on tuning the setup (suspension mainly) to where it is. I'd be annoyed if I had to do that with another new car too often.