Danoff
Premium
- 34,032
- Mile High City
I think you misread me actually.I'm not exactly sure how you misread that, but said I was hoping the repairing of the ozone layer would be sped up, not that I wanted it reversed. I'm also not sure why you quoted this into an entirely different thread than where i posted it, and several weeks after I said it, but whatevs I guess.
Your presumption is that a reduction in global population would help repair the ozone hole. My counterpoint is that the ozone hole is being repaired as global population increases rather than decreases. So why do you want a population decrease?