Put it this way. The way PD used to add cars, were by adding duplicates. So, there'd still be 200+ Gr. 3/GT3 cars with varied livery. Same amount of content.Good God, GTS's content is a fraction of GT6's, and here comes this thread saying it should have even LESS!!!
Here's a tip: If you want to only have Group 3 races in the game, just race in Group 3 races!
Problem solved, you're welcome!
Tell that to Polyphony Digital with their bloated car counts. Did you read what I typed? That's what they used to do.300 livery changes on the same few cars is not 300 cars!
"How is it "Less" content with only Gr. 3?" - I see math not a strong subject for you! Less variety, less choice, less content.
The problem with your whole thread is, you can already play the game with 100% GT3/Gr3 cars. Just ignore the rest..! You can make or download all the liveries you want.
And those of us (the apparent vast majority) that want variety can still play the game any 🤬 way we want to as well.
Win/win.
He's been like that for some time now. Just ignore himAnd you're just trolling now. Cool.
Just did.He's been like that for some time now. Just ignore him
I presume OP has never heard of "Assetto Corsa Competizione
Big 60 car grids for Spa 24H?
I'm all for a spin off/offshoot... WhichI still say despite what was said...GT sport isnt GT7. Its almost like a spinoff/hold over for the "next gen" console. If GT would do anything...id like to see an arcade type GT. I don't like Forza Motorsport but horizon 3(1st horizon i played) was cool and i hear 4 is straight.
Let Assetto and the upcoming GTR3 handle the 1 class games. I like options and that would be a game i would most likely not purchase....unless it included Gr1.-Gr4 with loads of tracks and applicable cars
I respect the hell out of the OP for saying it but...
The game is already a defacto GT3 simulator given that there's so many and it feels like PD have inadvertently put a whole lot of emphasis on this class... I love this class and its such a good 'bread and butter' class for GT Sport to feature.
However of course PD in this 'modern era' has put a spotlight on the Group C and LMP class AND the controversial VGT class.
And look how much people really love the sub N400 road cars.
This is kind of what spurred my question. Strictly race cars, done right, may have been the better route. Same. I'm having fun with the game. However, as you mentioned, getting that core aspect right, would make it better as well.No. The MR cars -- a decent chunk of the Gr.3 class -- were almost undriveable with tire wear until very recently.
But I do wish PD had been 100% dedicated to the racing-focused concept for GT Sport. Only include racing cars (and maybe some high-end sports cars). You could still have a large car count only being focused on race cars. Also they should have added a training mode that taught racecraft, instead of two sportsmanship videos and then dumped into the meat grinder. Sport mode should be much more elaborate, with multiple class types per day, long (1-2 hour) endurance races, social competitive features like friend-based leaderboards, and tournaments that are meaningful and offer rewards to more than just the top 0.1% of drivers. Would also have been cool to have an actual pit team with names and stats that affect how fast they, how many mistakes they make, etc.
Instead what we got is a tepid experience that only offers lip service to racing, but mostly tries to lean heavily on the old GT tropes. My philosophy is, if you're not going to do it right and go all in on something, don't bother doing it at all. Kaz shouldn't have bothered with GTS and instead should've just made GT7. "GT Sport" is a mostly meaningless name. Not to say I haven't had fun with it, but that's mostly because of the community and the car handling, not PD's efforts towards a racing experience or lack thereof.