The problems you mention with the failed AH tests aren't a factor in 99% of DVDs. I've yet to come across any that pose a problem when deinterlacing.
And my TV does just fine at deinterlacing 480i content through component. It's losing nothing, believe me. I've worked with raw video long enough to know exactly what I'm looking for when it comes to deinterlacing and inverse pulldown.
Unfortunately, I have no way of sending 1080i signals to it to see how it performs, except GT4. But since it's not 24p, the TV has no choice but to eliminate one field. Any other TV would do the same with that particular signal.
Beyond that, I have no reason to feed it a 1080i signal. My X360 is set to 1080p, as will be my PS3 (I will in fact disable 1080i). Blu-ray/HD-DVD will always be 1080p. I can't think of any 1080i signal that I would ever send to it (for the record, I don't watch television, so over-the-air 1080i broadcasts will never be seen, either).
The HDMI "problem" wasn't fully researched by AH, I think. Several owners of the TV did complain about the "sparkle" issue, but later reported that the problem vanished when they bought better cables. Apparently, buying "bottom of the barrel" HDMI cables does have an effect, so I'll be avoiding them (but I'm not stupid enough to buy $100 Monster cables, either).
Westinghouse's reputation isn't near as "bad" as you make it out to be, either. I'll be the first to admit that it's not a top-of-the-line TV, but that doesn't necessarily mean it sucks. But considering the price, it's still one hell of a bargain. As an example, when I first saw the thing set up in Best Buy before I bought mine, they had it sitting next to a Sony 1080p LCD. Contrast and color between the two were identical. The only noticable difference was that the Sony image appeared to be sharper, but I quickly realized this was because of some sort of edge-enhancement processing that was happening in the TV. And after only a minute or so, the artifacts became highly annoying. Had the feature been turned off, as any self-respecting videophile will do, I imagine the image would have been nigh-indistinguishable from the Westy.
And did I mention that the Sony was double the price?
That's what it came down to, really. Cost versus return. I was upgrading from a very old SDTV. The leap to HD was so great that any further leap to a "better" HDTV simply wasn't worth paying another two grand. For twice the price, I would NOT have gotten twice the quality.
I don't know what Westinghouse did to you to make you hate them so much, or maybe you just hang around a bunch of Westy-haters or something.. but it's not near as bad as you make it out to be. Nowhere close.
And my TV does just fine at deinterlacing 480i content through component. It's losing nothing, believe me. I've worked with raw video long enough to know exactly what I'm looking for when it comes to deinterlacing and inverse pulldown.
Unfortunately, I have no way of sending 1080i signals to it to see how it performs, except GT4. But since it's not 24p, the TV has no choice but to eliminate one field. Any other TV would do the same with that particular signal.
Beyond that, I have no reason to feed it a 1080i signal. My X360 is set to 1080p, as will be my PS3 (I will in fact disable 1080i). Blu-ray/HD-DVD will always be 1080p. I can't think of any 1080i signal that I would ever send to it (for the record, I don't watch television, so over-the-air 1080i broadcasts will never be seen, either).
The HDMI "problem" wasn't fully researched by AH, I think. Several owners of the TV did complain about the "sparkle" issue, but later reported that the problem vanished when they bought better cables. Apparently, buying "bottom of the barrel" HDMI cables does have an effect, so I'll be avoiding them (but I'm not stupid enough to buy $100 Monster cables, either).
Westinghouse's reputation isn't near as "bad" as you make it out to be, either. I'll be the first to admit that it's not a top-of-the-line TV, but that doesn't necessarily mean it sucks. But considering the price, it's still one hell of a bargain. As an example, when I first saw the thing set up in Best Buy before I bought mine, they had it sitting next to a Sony 1080p LCD. Contrast and color between the two were identical. The only noticable difference was that the Sony image appeared to be sharper, but I quickly realized this was because of some sort of edge-enhancement processing that was happening in the TV. And after only a minute or so, the artifacts became highly annoying. Had the feature been turned off, as any self-respecting videophile will do, I imagine the image would have been nigh-indistinguishable from the Westy.
And did I mention that the Sony was double the price?
That's what it came down to, really. Cost versus return. I was upgrading from a very old SDTV. The leap to HD was so great that any further leap to a "better" HDTV simply wasn't worth paying another two grand. For twice the price, I would NOT have gotten twice the quality.
I don't know what Westinghouse did to you to make you hate them so much, or maybe you just hang around a bunch of Westy-haters or something.. but it's not near as bad as you make it out to be. Nowhere close.