Sage Ages
(Banned)
- 12,817
- Antarctica
Outback or Forester diesel would be better suited. More practicality and has that first part covered for you already.
They're ugly.
Outback or Forester diesel would be better suited. More practicality and has that first part covered for you already.
4: It more than likely runs on diesel, so it'll get decent gas mileage, and even though siphoning would be dangerous, a lot of cars around here run on diesel. That would give me a lot of potential fuel supplies.
They're ugly.
Landy 101.
Unfortunately your storage space will be full of spare parts, metal plate, and a welding rig. You'd be better off with a space hopper.
As for fitting a TDi unit, good luck with that. If you do succeed in fitting one, here's more good luck for when you try and change the cam belt!
None, a bicycle is a far safer idea... For the simple fact it can go pretty much anywhere, requires no fuel and can even produce electricity for your camp quite simply. All fossil fuels vehicles are useless as speed and brute force will not be your ally against a foe which can hunt you for miles once they have heard you... Not mentioning your issues with fuel in those big V8 monsters...
I saw a post where someone said the arctic tundra was a bad place to be, its not as bad as you think as the zombies will be frozen, therefore they can't attack you during the winter - perfect for travelling.
However this all depends on the class of outbreak...
You know, if gas isn't a concern, one can pick up a T-55 for about $35,000-$40,000.
Wouldn't be the first time I've driven one.If this was 20 or so years go, a tank could be a possibility, assuming you know how to operate one.
You know, if gas isn't a concern, one can pick up a T-55 for about $35,000-$40,000.
And really, you could practically run it on rotgut vodka anyway, so even that wouldn't be much of a problem.
If fuel was not a concern then yes these.I still stand by my original choice.
I'm going rambo!