Anyone else think that the Zonda's replacement is no where near as beautiful as the Zonda?
Anyone else think that the Zonda's replacement is no where near as beautiful as the Zonda?
Anyone else think that the Zonda's replacement is no where near as beautiful as the Zonda?
I would imagine the Stig's laps would be pretty on the money though, there's not a lot of danger on that track and we've seen when he pushes it too far (Koenigsegg CCX)
I know alot of people here think the grip of race tires are all wrong, and I'm not about address that (though it could explain the difference in lap times) but what I want to bring up is another Top Gear episode. The one where clarkson is playing GT4, driving an NSX at laguna seca, then he drives the actual track with the car and he eventually concludes that driving in a game you can go all out 100%, all 10 tenths, but in real life you prefer to live so you hold back and you only give 9 tenths.
Please dont bring up how this or that game is unrealistic, I just trying to talk about the diffences between real life racing and games in the sence of how far a driver will "push it".
Plus the Stig I imagine only has so many go's at his laps (however long the manufacturer leaves the car with them) while we have all the time we want to shave tenths off and get used to the car.
bye bye Zonda my ass... this is a great car but c'mon... they have made waaaaay too many versions of it. get to the new car already. a decade with one car is enough. THAT GOES FOR LAMBO AS WELL
porsche have been doimg it for the past 30-40 years with the 91. and that goes for most companies too, ford focus, fiat punto etc
no im not too bothered - let people talk about what they want...
Im just getting a bit bored of putting a new post up for 5 mins later an admin strolling in to close it because he/she/it thinks that the search function is actually a good thing...
pretty much every post could be closed because each subject rolls into another...
Anyway rant done.
Zonda R Rules.
PS I love anarchy.