- 87,651
- Rule 12
- GTP_Famine
Did I say that my source was a magazine, or internet publication? My source was Iceman (I think). And the way it was worded was that the car was ready two years ago, but they didnt release it for a good reason.
Given that we've established that neither the engine or chassis were "ready" until relatively recently, we're left with only the conclusion that some bloke on an internet site says that some other bloke on an internet site (maybe) says that the designer finished the body 2 years ago.
Well, gosh. A car designed 2 years before it hit the market? Watch me pass out with amazement.
Here's a thought. Or rather a series of them:
1. When posting your rumours, link directly where the rumour appears, wherever your source is. If it's an internet site link directly to the post in question.
2. Establish for us that your rumours come from a credible source and not some random internet guy. Here's a clue: If the post is in English, the guy isn't from Wolfsburg.
3. If you can't do either of these things, shut the hell up about your "rumours".
Posting information without source reference or credible origin is lying. One more unsupported "rumour" masquerading as fact and I will ban you.