ROAD_DOGG33J
Premium
- 14,206
- IL, USA
- holyc0w1
- holyc0w
I never understood why people like this car so much and I still don't. It's a Merc, which is kind of cool. But it's also pretty ugly.
Where's my rope?
No really, I'd like to hear the explanation behind this, Paulie.
The reason I pushed it the extra mile is the fact that it is arguably the first super car. That is a cool thing right there. Another is that if you saw one in the street, you would follow it out of sight. And the last, is that you don't want to be in one under just about any circumstance. The rear axle has a nasty habit of killing drivers, and the interior's under-floor padding sucks, so, whether you like it or not, you've got the heater going full blast under you.
I think that makes it at least a cool car. Then, adding in the opinions about the looks, one I share about it being beautiful, the amazingly fresh design, and the knowledge that anyone, even if they are ignorant of cars, will see that car and know. Know it has some major integrity in the car world. That makes it sub-zero to me.
Your first paragraph, all things I didn't know about it (although the axle doesn't sound very cool ). But you did say arguably, the Jaguar XK120 for example pre-dates it. But I wouldn't follow it out of sight. The looks are plain to me, give me a C1 Corvette any day, but last I checked that's all opinion and even though the Veyron is the fastest car today, it's not liked by everyone, the same applies to the 300SL.
As for attention grabbing, a Karmann Ghia has that same sort of effect of people knowing it looks good, but that wasn't exactly a fast car.
I wouldn't really count the XK120 as a super car, but that's personal opinion. I know for a fact that if you saw a 300SL, you would chase after the sucker and scramble for pictures. Or at least, I would. And just about did. For the 190SL at least.
I think the looks are excellent for the era. The Corvette, I would rate as sub-zero too, but for different reasons.
And, last, the attention grabbing, certainly, the Karmann-Ghia does attract a lot of attention. But, and here's the point, you know that the SL is truly special. Or something. Normal people might think it's cute and shiny.
I'm not sure what constitutes a super car, I've always felt that the 300SL was the first, because that's what I was taught. If you go by speed, then the Daimler Motor Carriage is a supercar, while the Lamborghini LP-560-4 isn't. What ever, I'll just wait for Famine.
Your first paragraph, all things I didn't know about it (although the axle doesn't sound very cool ). But you did say arguably, the Jaguar XK120 for example pre-dates it. But I wouldn't follow it out of sight. The looks are plain to me, give me a C1 Corvette any day, but last I checked that's all opinion and even though the Veyron is the fastest car today, it's not liked by everyone, the same applies to the 300SL.
As for attention grabbing, a Karmann Ghia has that same sort of effect of people knowing it looks good, but that wasn't exactly a fast car.
It doesn't ignite anything inside me, perhaps there should be an on-the-fence option, but nothing about this car makes me want to vote it cool.
Why because it's not an Australian car? Congratulations on ruining the poll.
And for the last time, there will be no middle of the road option. If you are that middle of the road about a car don't vote.
Why because it's not an Australian car? Congratulations on ruining the poll.
And for the last time, there will be no middle of the road option. If you are that middle of the road about a car don't vote.
Since this car gets this kind of support, I should have voted seriously uncool. How is the poll ruined? Since when do I only like Aussie cars? Why are you even allowed to post on these forums with your "far more biased than your perceived view of me" BS?
Joey, I know this has been a little stressful lately, but I think you went too far here.
Take a few minutes and cool off, okay.
Since this car gets this kind of support, I should have voted seriously uncool. How is the poll ruined? Since when do I only like Aussie cars? Why are you even allowed to post on these forums with your "far more biased than your perceived view of me" BS?
It doesn't ignite anything inside me, perhaps there should be an on-the-fence option, but nothing about this car makes me want to vote it cool.
Your first paragraph, all things I didn't know about it (although the axle doesn't sound very cool ). But you did say arguably, the Jaguar XK120 for example pre-dates it. But I wouldn't follow it out of sight. The looks are plain to me, give me a C1 Corvette any day, but last I checked that's all opinion and even though the Veyron is the fastest car today, it's not liked by everyone, the same applies to the 300SL.
As for attention grabbing, a Karmann Ghia has that same sort of effect of people knowing it looks good, but that wasn't exactly a fast car.
The Motor Carriage never made an attempt at being fast, it made an attempt at personal transportation alternate to the horse. The concept of fast cars hadn't even been dreamt of yet back then because cars didn't even exist properly yet. The XK120 was meant to be fast, it was a racer, and it was the fastest production car on the planet at the time, it was a supercar. The LP-560-4 is meant to be fast, and damn fast it is, it's a supercar.
I've been planning something since the start for the car that gets all cool rating, you went ahead and voted it uncool for it for pretty much unknown reasons, thus ruining the poll. You did the same thing for the Classic Mini as well. Based on your posting history the only thing I can really conclude is because the cars aren't from Australia or America.
You really think I'm that biased? I don't like GM or Chrysler products, and even then I don't hate all of them. Yes we all have biases, some are just more extreme than others.
And I'm pretty sure telling someone they shouldn't post on these boards is a forum no-no.
Nah I'm good. I'm slowly starting to see that the cool wall probably isn't going to work the way it currently is done because of stuff like this. People either vote for the wrong reasons, thinking cool somehow equals performance, or they state they are on the fence about a car and just vote willy nilly. Perhaps before more nominations are open I'll need to examine a better way of doing this.
Nah I'm good. I'm slowly starting to see that the cool wall probably isn't going to work the way it currently is done because of stuff like this. People either vote for the wrong reasons, thinking cool somehow equals performance, or they state they are on the fence about a car and just vote willy nilly. Perhaps before more nominations are open I'll need to examine a better way of doing this.
Pretty much unknown reasons? REALLY? WOW!!!!
In fact, you basically said you have no opinion really, as you wanted an on the fence option...It doesn't ignite anything inside me, perhaps there should be an on-the-fence option, but nothing about this car makes me want to vote it cool.
No car will EVER get an all cool rating, cars are designed for a target audience and that target audience will always exclude another group. The only way you could possibly believe one car would get an all cool rating is that you really are biased enough to believe this car is the be-all end-all of automotive excellence/cool factor.
You'll also notice I withdrew my comment before you posted, heat of the moment fingers, gone now.
Man, you make yourself out to be all about Holdens (I recall your previous user name) and go on and on about them.
Then, you have problems with one of the most iconic cars ever created. I don't like Mercedes much, but this car is legend.
But then, you come in here and basically post "I don't have an opinion." Why post at all?
Why bother getting annoyed when someone calls you out on your bias?
And why do you make something into a personal attack? What right do you have to tell someone off? Let alone someone that has been involved with this community for 6 years longer than you have?
I've been planning something since the start for the car that gets all cool rating, you went ahead and voted it uncool for it for pretty much unknown reasons, thus ruining the poll.
I still think that you could justify a "ridiculously cool." type thing if over 90% of the votes (using real math) are sub-zero.
Edit: You know, this is quite possibly the most hypocritical argument I've ever been in on GTP. Here you are ridiculing me for voting your favourite car uncool while accusing me of bias! UNREAL!