- 274
Ya, like the Europeans treated America any differently.
That's why the Americans are afraid to step into Europe
Ya, like the Europeans treated America any differently.
I am so glad this week is over in a few hours. All I seem to do this one is step on everyone's toes.
Pah. I still like the Sedan. I'm weird like that. :3
I know what you mean.I am so glad this week is over in a few hours. All I seem to do this one is step on everyone's toes.
I do, too. Just not this one.Pah. I still like the Sedan. I'm weird like that. :3
Sedans typically always looked better proportioned back then I think. The trendy design cues and regulations of today are what makes small cars look idiotic. The ascending belt line and the pedestrian-safe hoods are the main culprits.Going smaller again actually, there were a few decent looking subcompact sedans in the 80s. I'm mainly thinking Vauxhall Nova and VW Polo/Classic:
Both are well proportioned despite their size. Modern regs won't let you get away with that any more, unfortunately.
I think the Riley Elf is as small as you can get with the traditional sedan design
FYI, I sat in a Fiesta SES w/sync last weekend and I love it! It rocks! If an ST/SVT comes out with the EcoBoost I4 turbo I'd seriously buy one.
Info on the Fiesta ST. PLEASE Ford bring this to the states!
http://www.autoblog.com/2011/04/01/report-ford-fiesta-st-to-get-180-horsepower/
- 1.6L Ecoboost @ 180hp
- 6-speed manual
- $20k?
Bro. The plan is to start using nothing but Ecoboost engines, eh? Which means that the 2.0 is just a stopgap at the moment, eh? Why make it use a different engine - that would require retuning of the suspension for differences in weight, possibly transmission adaption or engine mount modification...and that all costs money. Just bring here what is over there. It already has the Ecoboost which is the whole point of Ford's new engine plan.I get the feeling it is going to be awfully expensive to use that kind of setup. Use the 2.0L, have the boys at SVT do the suspension work, and give it a (much needed) short-throw shifter.
So, JCE, have you found a buyer to your Focus SVT yet?
Why make it use a different engine - that would require retuning of the suspension for differences in weight, possibly transmission adaption or engine mount modification...and that all costs money. Just bring here what is over there. It already has the Ecoboost which is the whole point of Ford's new engine plan.
I'm not completely against the EcoBoost 1.6L, but hearing that they're going to want to charge $20K for the thing makes my toes curl a bit. If they were to use the DIG 2.0L I4 from the 2012 Focus, losing (maybe) 20 BHP, they could save some money, and sell the car for less.
Otherwise, the car is awesome as-is.
I'm not completely against the EcoBoost 1.6L, but hearing that they're going to want to charge $20K for the thing makes my toes curl a bit. If they were to use the DIG 2.0L I4 from the 2012 Focus, losing (maybe) 20 BHP, they could save some money, and sell the car for less.
Otherwise, the car is awesome as-is.
The US needs the 3dr ST! That thing looks awesome. I do have one complaint though, it would roughly be the same size and a similar power to my SVT--one would think they could squeeze out 190-200bhp at least out of that 1.6L turbo...
The US needs the 3dr ST! That thing looks awesome. I do have one complaint though, it would roughly be the same size and a similar power to my SVT--one would think they could squeeze out 190-200bhp at least out of that 1.6L turbo...